Eastern District of California • 1:26-cv-08919

#1

Oct 29, 2026

2241 PETITION for WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS against Warden, Central Valley Annex Facility by Geronimo Esono Ndong Angue. # 1 Civil Cover Sheet). (Deputy Clerk LMS) (Entered: 10/30/2026)

#2

Oct 29, 2026

MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Geronimo Esono Ndong Angue. (Deputy Clerk LMS) (Entered: 10/30/2026)

#3

Oct 29, 2026

MOTION for APPOINTMENT of COUNSEL by Geronimo Esono Ndong Angue. (Deputy Clerk LMS) (Entered: 10/30/2026)

#4

Oct 29, 2026

MOTION for Expedited return and Record Production by Geronimo Esono Ndong Angue. (Deputy Clerk LMS) (Entered: 10/30/2026)

#5

Oct 29, 2026

MOTION for TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER and PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION by Geronimo Esono Ndong Angue. (Deputy Clerk LMS) (Entered: 10/30/2026)

#6

Oct 30, 2026

IMMIGRATION NEW CASE DOCUMENTS. (Attachments: # 1 Litigant Letter) (Deputy Clerk LMS) (Entered: 10/30/2026)

#7

Oct 30, 2026

DESIGNATION of COUNSEL FOR SERVICE. Added attorney Anthony Andrews for Warden, Central Valley Annex Facility (Andrews, Anthony) (Entered: 10/30/2026)

Oct 30, 2026

SERVICE BY MAIL: 6 Immigration New Case Documents served on Geronimo Esono Ndong Angue. (Deputy Clerk LMS)

Oct 30, 2026

Service by Mail

#8

Nov 03, 2026

MINUTE ORDER (Text Only Entry) signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 11/3/2026: Pending the issuance of the court's order resolving the pending 5 motion for temporary restraining order, the court ORDERS that respondents shall not take any action to remove petitioner from the United States or to move petitioner out of the Eastern District of California. See F.T.C. v. Dean Foods Co., 384 U.S. 597, 604 (1966) (acknowledging the court's express authority under the All Writs Act to issue such temporary injunctions as may be necessary to protect its own jurisdiction). Given the exigent circumstances present, the court finds that this order is warranted to maintain the status quo pending its forthcoming order resolving petitioner's pending 5 motion for temporary restraining order. Further, the court has conducted a preliminary review of the pending motion and petition for writ of habeas corpus and observes that this case may involve core issues that the undersigned has previously addressed in this context. Accordingly, the parties are advised that if the court concludes that petitioner is entitled to the relief that is requested in the pending motion, then the court will also rule on the merits of the underlying petition. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 65(a)(2) ("Before or after beginning the hearing on a motion for a preliminary injunction, the court may advance the trial on the merits and consolidate it with the hearing."); Dzhabrailov v. Decker, No. 20-cv-03118-PMH, 2020 WL 2731966, at *4 (S.D.N.Y. May 26, 2020) (considering the merits of the habeas petition and motion for preliminary injunction simultaneously). Counsel for respondents shall promptly enter Notices of Appearance if they have not already done so. Respondents shall file a written opposition to the pending 5 motion for temporary restraining order by 5:00 PM on Wednesday, 11/4/2026. In that opposition, respondents shall substantively address whether any provision of law or fact in this case would distinguish it from this court's decisions in Zurita Navarro v. Warden, Cent. Valley Annex Det. Facility, No. 1:26-cv-05661-DAD-SCR (HC), 2026 WL 2294963 (E.D. Cal. Aug. 10, 2026); Ayala Cajina v. Wofford, No. 1:25-cv-01566-DAD-AC (HC), 2025 WL 3251083 (E.D. Cal. Nov. 21, 2025); Perez v. Albarran, No. 1:25-cv-01540-DAD-CSK (HC), 2025 WL 3187578 (E.D. Cal. Nov. 14, 2025); Chavarria v. Chestnut, No. 1:25-cv-01755-DAD-AC, 2025 WL 3533606 (E.D. Cal. Dec. 9, 2025); Yang v. Kaiser, No. 2:25-cv-02205-DAD-AC (HC), 2025 WL 2791778 (E.D. Cal. Aug. 20, 2025); Quichimbo-Jimenez v. Warden, Cal. City Corr. Ctr., 2:26-cv-00739-DAD-EFB (HC), 2026 WL 679378 (E.D. Cal. Mar. 10, 2026); Cardenas v. Chestnut, et al., No. 1:26-cv-02073-DAD-SCR (HC), 2026 WL 785871 (E.D. Cal. Mar. 20, 2026); J.P.C. v. Chestnut, 1:26-cv-02108-DAD-JDP, 2026 WL 788129 (E.D. Cal. Mar. 20, 2026), and other similar cases previously decided by this court, or otherwise indicate that the matter is not substantively distinguishable. The court will construe failure to distinguish the above cited cases as a concession that the cases are not substantively distinguishable. If respondents oppose this court ruling on the underlying petition, then respondents are DIRECTED to indicate so and provide substantive reasons in support thereof in their opposition. (Deputy Clerk PAB) (Entered: 11/03/2026)

Nov 03, 2026

SERVICE BY MAIL: 8 Minute Order served on Geronimo Esono Ndong Angue. (Deputy Clerk PAB)

Nov 03, 2026

Service by Mail

Nov 03, 2026

Minute Order

#9

Nov 04, 2026

Dismiss

#11

Nov 05, 2026

Notice of Related Case

#12

Nov 05, 2026

ORDER signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 11/5/2026 GRANTING the Petitioner's 1 petition for writ of habeas corpus as follows: Respondent is ORDERED to immediately release petitioner Geronimo Esono Ndong Angue, A-File No. 240-459-579, f rom respondent's custody; Respondent is ENJOINED AND RESTRAINED from re-detaining petitioner for any purpose, absent exigent circumstances, without providing petitioner notice and a pre-detention hearing before an immigration judge, at which hea ring the burden will be set in accordance with 8 U.S.C. § 1226(a) and its implementing regulations; GRANTING Petitioner's 2 motion to proceed in forma pauperis; DENYING Petitioner's 3 4 motions to appoint counsel, for expedited r eturn and record production, and for 5 temporary restraining order,as having been rendered moot by this order granting him habeas relief; and DENYING 9 Respondent's motion to dismiss. (cc ICE Central Valley Annex) CASE CLOSED(Deputy Clerk RRB)

#13

Nov 05, 2026

Judgment

Nov 05, 2026

Service by Mail