Western District of Texas • 5:26-cv-06621
Gonzalez Morales v. Warden, Karnes County Immigration Processing Center
Active
Case Information
Filed: October 14, 2026
Assigned to:
Orlando Luis Garcia
Referred to:
—
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee
Cause:
28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Active
Last Activity:
October 29, 2026
Parties:
View All Parties →
Docket Entries
#1
Oct 14, 2026
Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus ( Filing fee $ 5 receipt number 13334), filed by Daiber Yohander Gonzalez Morales. (Attachments: # 1 receipt, # 2 envelope)(mgr) (Entered: 10/15/2026)
Main Document:
Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
#2
Oct 14, 2026
MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order by Daiber Yohander Gonzalez Morales. (mgr) (Entered: 10/15/2026)
Main Document:
Temporary Restraining Order
#3
Oct 14, 2026
Case Opening Letter mailed to Daiber Yohander Gonzalez Morales. (mgr) (Entered: 10/15/2026)
Main Document:
Case Opening Letter
Oct 14, 2026
If ordered by the court, all referrals will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Chestney (mgr)
Oct 14, 2026
THIS CASE HAS BEEN RANDOMLY ASSIGNED TO JUDGE ORLANDO L. GARCIA (mgr)
Oct 15, 2026
To be Referred to SA Mag Judge
Oct 15, 2026
Order on Motion for TRO
Oct 15, 2026
Text Order DENYING 2 Motion for or Temporary Restraining Order. Because the injunctive relief Petitioner now seeks on a preliminary and ex parte basis is identical to the ultimate relief sought on the merits of this already-expedited habeas proceeding, the Motion is DENIED. The Court will resolve Petitioners request for relief by promptly ruling on the merits of the writ itself. See Garcia-Aleman v. Thompson, No. 25-CV-886-OLG, Dkt. No. 20 (W.D. Tex. Oct. 30, 2025) (collecting cases). Signed by Judge Orlando L. Garcia. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (ks1)
Oct 15, 2026
Remark (No Doc#)
#4
Oct 16, 2026
ORDER FOR SERVICE--Upon review, it is ORDERED that notice of electronic filing (NEF) of the Petition (Dkt. No. 1) and this Order to the United States Attorney in San Antonio, Texas shall constitute service on the Federal Respondents, as required by the Rules Governing § 2254 Cases1 and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5, and on all Respondents unless otherwise contested.2 It is further ORDERED that Respondents must file a response to the Petition (Dkt. No. 1) within 7 days of electronic service. The Court construes the Petition as raising, at least in part, a Fifth Amendment Due Process claim which Respondents should address. See, e.g., Bonilla Chicas v. Warden, 821 F.Supp.3d 782, 79293 (S.D. Tex. Feb. 20, 2026); Marceau v. Noem, No. 26-CV237-KC, 2026 WL 368953, at *1 (W.D. Tex. Feb. 9, 2026). The response must identify all pertinent factual and procedural background information, including: (a) the date Petitioner entered the United States; (b) whether Petitioner was previously apprehended and then released by immigration authorities; and (c) the status of Petitioners immigration and/or removal proceedings. Petitioner may file a reply within 7 days thereafter.. Signed by Judge Orlando L. Garcia. (mgr) (Entered: 10/16/2026)
Main Document:
Order
#5
Oct 22, 2026
Response
Main Document:
Response
#6
Oct 29, 2026
Response
Main Document:
Response
Parties
Gonzalez Morales
Party
Warden, Karnes County Immigration Processing Center
Party