Eastern District of California • 1:26-cv-08342

#1

Oct 13, 2026

PETITION for WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS against Warden, Central Valley Annex Detention Facility by Arturo Jimenez-Gonzalez. (Deputy Clerk DAR) (Entered: 10/15/2026)

#2

Oct 13, 2026

MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Arturo Jimenez-Gonzalez. (Deputy Clerk DAR) (Entered: 10/15/2026)

#3

Oct 13, 2026

MOTION for TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER by Arturo Jimenez-Gonzalez. (Deputy Clerk DAR) (Entered: 10/15/2026)

#4

Oct 13, 2026

MOTION to APPOINT COUNSEL by Arturo Jimenez-Gonzalez. (Deputy Clerk DAR) (Entered: 10/15/2026)

Oct 13, 2026

RECEIPT number 100010006 for $5.00 for Arturo Jimenez-Gonzalez from Geo Secure Services LLC. (Deputy Clerk DAR)

#5

Oct 15, 2026

IMMIGRATION NEW CASE DOCUMENTS (Attachments: # 1 Consent Form) (Deputy Clerk DAR) (Entered: 10/15/2026)

#6

Oct 15, 2026

DESIGNATION of COUNSEL FOR SERVICE. Added attorney Jonathan Williams, GOVT for Warden, Central Valley Annex Detention Facility (Williams, Jonathan) (Entered: 10/15/2026)

#7

Oct 15, 2026

MINUTE ORDER issued by the Courtroom Deputy for District Judge Dena M. Coggins on 10/15/2026: The court has reviewed Petitioner's 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and 3 Motion for Temporary Restraining Order. From these filings, it is unclear whether Petitioner has previously been released from immigration custody, or whether the challenged detention is Petitioner's first contact with immigration authorities. Noncitizens present without admission who are apprehended in the interior of the United States are subject to discretionary detention under 8 U.S.C. § 1226, not mandatory detention under § 1225(b)(2)(A). See Rodriguez Vazquez v. Bostock, 183 F.4th 1160, 1165 (9th Cir. July 30, 2026). This court has previously addressed claims where noncitizens were re-detained after being released from immigration custody (see, e.g., Selis Tinoco v. Noem, 818 F. Supp. 3d 1141 (E.D. Cal. Dec. 14, 2025); Labrador-Prato v. Noem, 815 F. Supp. 3d 1113 (E.D. Cal. Dec. 2, 2025); D.L.C. v. Wofford, 1:25-cv-01996-DC-JDP, 2026 WL 25511 (E.D. Cal. Jan. 5, 2026)), and where noncitizens were detained by immigration authorities for the first time after having lived in the United States for an extended period of time (See e.g., Alvarez Maciel v. Noem, No. 1:26-cv-01318-DC-CKD, 2026 WL 496948 (E.D. Cal. Feb. 23, 2026); Barajas Ortiz v. Chestnut, No. 1:26-cv-01167-DC-SCR, 2026 WL 508419 (E.D. Cal. Feb. 24, 2026)). Respondents shall file an Opposition or Statement of Non-Opposition to the 3 Motion for Temporary Restraining Order by 12:00 PM on 10/19/2026. In their response, Respondents shall indicate whether Petitioner has previously been released from immigration custody, and shall substantively address whether there are any factual or legal issues in this case that materially distinguish it from Rodriguez Vazquez and this court's applicable orders cited above. Petitioner may file a Reply by 11/2/2026. Finally, the court is contemplating ruling directly on the 1 Petition, with the understanding that the court will also consider any arguments made and exhibits submitted in support of the Motion for Temporary Restraining Order. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 65(a)(2) ("Before or after beginning the hearing on a motion for a preliminary injunction, the court may advance the trial on the merits and consolidate it with the hearing."); see also 28 U.S.C. § 2243 ("The court shall summarily hear and determine the facts, and dispose of [a petitioner's habeas petition] as law and justice require."); A.R. v. Chestnut, No. 1:26-cv-00551-KES-SAB, 2026 WL 227112, at *1 (E.D. Cal. Jan. 28, 2026) (considering preliminary injunction and merits of habeas petition simultaneously). Both parties shall address whether they oppose the court ruling directly on the Petition. Respondents are further directed to include in their response: (i) the detention authority identified by or relied upon by the detaining agency at the time of detention; (ii) all documentation and evidence verifying that basis for detention and reflecting the steps the detaining agency took to comply with the procedural requirements of that detention authority; and (iii) all documentation, if any, reflecting whether and when Petitioner received notice of that basis for detention. The matter is not set for a hearing though the court may set one should it later be determined that a hearing is necessary. (Text Only Entry) (Deputy Clerk CRS) (Entered: 10/15/2026)

Oct 15, 2026

Minute Order AND ~Util - Set Motion and F&R Deadlines/Hearings

Oct 15, 2026

SERVICE BY MAIL: Minute Order, filed at Doc. No. 7, served on Arturo Jimenez-Gonzalez. (Text Only Entry) (Deputy Clerk CRS)

Oct 15, 2026

Service by Mail

Oct 15, 2026

SERVICE BY MAIL: 5 Immigration New Case Documents served on Arturo Jimenez-Gonzalez. (Deputy Clerk DAR)

#8

Oct 19, 2026

Opposition to Motion

#9

Oct 20, 2026

ORDER signed by District Judge Dena M. Coggins on 10/20/26 GRANTING 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and 3 Motion for TRO as follows: Petitioner Arturo Jimenez-Gonzalez (A-222-569-242) shall be RELEASED IMMEDIATELY from Respondents' cus tody with all documents and possessions and within 3 days, Respondents shall file a notice of compliance. If the government seeks to re-detain Petitioner, they shall provide him with a bond hearing at which Petitioner shall bear the burden of showin g that he is not a flight risk or a risk to community safety. This order does not address the circumstances in which Respondents may detain Petitioner in the event Petitioner becomes subject to an executable final order of removal and Petitioner receives notice of that final order of removal. Clerk to serve Central Valley Annex Detention Facility, enter judgment for Petitioner, and close this case (cc: CVADF). CASE CLOSED. (Deputy Clerk AJB)

#10

Oct 20, 2026

Judgment

Oct 20, 2026

Service by Mail

#11

Oct 22, 2026

Notice of Compliance