Eastern District of California • 1:26-cv-08427

#1

Oct 13, 2026

PETITION for WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS against All Defendants by Kevin Rodriguez Macedo. (Filing fee $ 5, receipt number ACAEDC-14003692) (Attachments: # 1 Cover Sheet)(Portugal, Mario) (Entered: 10/13/2026)

#2

Oct 14, 2026

IMMIGRATION NEW CASE DOCUMENTS (Attachments: # 1 Consent Form) (Deputy Clerk SZ) (Entered: 10/14/2026)

#3

Oct 14, 2026

MINUTE ORDER issued by Courtroom Deputy for Chief District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 10/14/2026: This matter is REFERRED to the assigned U.S. Magistrate Judge for further proceedings pursuant to Local Rule 302 and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). Pending the Court's ruling on the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, Respondents shall NOT TRANSFER Petitioner out of this District. See F.T.C. v. Dean Foods Co., 384 U.S. 597, 608 (1966) (noting the Court's "express authority under the All Writs Act to issue such temporary injunctions as may be necessary to protect its own jurisdiction."). (TEXT ONLY ENTRY) (Deputy Clerk MDK) (Entered: 10/14/2026)

#4

Oct 14, 2026

DESIGNATION of COUNSEL FOR SERVICE. Added attorney Jonathan Yu, GOVT for Warden Central Valley Annex (Yu, Jonathan) (Entered: 10/14/2026)

Oct 14, 2026

Minute Order

#5

Oct 15, 2026

MINUTE ORDER (Text Only Entry) issued by Courtroom Deputy for Magistrate Judge Sean C. Riordan on 10/15/2026: Respondent is directed to show cause why the writ should not be granted by filing an answer/return to the § 2241 petition no later than October 16, 2026 at 5:00 p.m. See 28 U.S.C. § 2243. This shortened timeline for an answer/return is warranted by the fact that Petitioner alleges that Respondent violated an order issued in Rodrigues Macedo v. Christopher J. Larose, No. 3:26-cv-02544-JO-MSB (S.D. Cal. May 21, 2026) which "ENJOIN[ED] Respondents from redetaining Petitioner during the pendency of his removal proceedings without first providing an individualized bond hearing before a neutral immigration judge where the government bears theburden of proving by clear and convincing evidence that Petitioner is a danger to the community or such a flight risk that no amount of bond or alternative conditions of release 'would suffice to ensure his future appearance.'" (Citation omitted.) Respondent shall specifically address whether petitioner received this pre-deprivation hearing prior to his re-detention as required by Rodrigues Macedo v. Christopher J. Larose, No. 3:26-cv-02544-JO-MSB. If no pre-deprivation hearing was conducted and Respondent continues to detain petitioner, the undersigned will issue Findings and Recommendations recommending that Respondent immediately release petitioner. (Deputy Clerk SH) (Entered: 10/15/2026)

Oct 15, 2026

Minute Order AND ~Util - 1 Set/Reset Deadlines and Hearings

Oct 19, 2026

Minute Order AND ~Util - 1 Terminate Deadlines and Hearings AND ~Util - Terminate Civil Case