District of Colorado • 1:26-cv-05217

#1

Oct 14, 2026

First APPLICATION for Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 USC 2241 (Filing fee $ 5, Receipt Number ACODC-11358847)Attorney Jodi Ellen Ziesemer added to party Mandeep Singh(pty:pet), filed by Mandeep Singh. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet, # 2 Exhibit, # 3 Exhibit, # 4 Exhibit, # 5 Exhibit)(Ziesemer, Jodi) (Entered: 10/14/2026)

#2

Oct 14, 2026

First MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order by Petitioner Mandeep Singh. (Ziesemer, Jodi) (Entered: 10/14/2026)

#3

Oct 14, 2026

NOTICE OF CASE ASSOCIATION by Jodi Ellen Ziesemer on behalf of Mandeep Singh (Ziesemer, Jodi) (Entered: 10/14/2026)

#4

Oct 14, 2026

NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Hans Christopher Meyer on behalf of Mandeep SinghAttorney Hans Christopher Meyer added to party Mandeep Singh(pty:pet) (Meyer, Hans) (Entered: 10/14/2026)

#5

Oct 14, 2026

ADVISORY NOTICE OF NONCOMPLIANCE WITH COURT RULES/PROCEDURES: re: 2 First MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order, 3 Notice of Case Association, 1 Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by attorney Jodi Ellen Ziesemer. DO NOT REFILE THE DOCUMENT. Action to take - counsel must submit a change of contact request through PACER pursuant to D.C.COLO.LAttyR 5(c) and 3.5 of the Electronic Case Filing Procedures (Civil cases). (Text Only Entry) (jberr, ) (Entered: 10/15/2026)

#6

Oct 14, 2026

Case assigned to Judge S. Kato Crews and drawn to Magistrate Judge N. Reid Neureiter. Text Only Entry. (jberr, ) Modified to correct date on 10/15/2026 (jberr, ). (Entered: 10/15/2026)

#7

Oct 19, 2026

ORDER: This matter is before the Court on Petitioner's 1 Application for a Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to provide notice to the United States Attorney's Office of this action and provide the United States Attorney's Office by email with the 1 Application, all of its attachments, the 2 Motion for Temporary Restraining Order, and a copy of this Order. Within seven days of the Notice to the United States Attorney's Office, Respondents shall SHOW CAUSE why the Petition should not be granted. See 28 U.S.C. § 2243. Unless otherwise ordered by the Court, if Respondents do not file a response to the Petition and Court Order by this deadline, IT IS ORDERED Petitioner shall be released from custody no later than 24 hours after the response deadline, and Respondents shall file, no later than seven days after the response deadline, a status report informing the Court that Petitioner has been released.Pursuant to the All Writs Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1651(a), Respondents SHALL NOT REMOVE Petitioner from the District of Colorado unless or until this Court or the Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit vacates this Order. SO ORDERED by Judge S. Kato Crews on 10/19/2026.Response to Petition due by 10/26/2026. Text Only Entry (skclc4) (Entered: 10/19/2026)

#8

Oct 19, 2026

CERTIFICATE of Service by Clerk of Court re 1 Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus, 4 Notice of Entry of Appearance, 2 First MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order, 3 Notice of Case Association, 7 Order to Serve United States Attorney's Office, emailed to USACO.ServImm2241@usdoj.gov. Text Only Entry (ggill, ) (Entered: 10/19/2026)

Oct 19, 2026

Serve USAO - Immigration Habeas

#9

Oct 26, 2026

RESPONSE to 1 Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus, 2 First MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order, 7 Order to Serve United States Attorney's Office,,,,, by Respondents Juan Baltazar, Todd Blanche, Markwayne Mullin, George Valdez, David VenturellaAttorney Andrew M. Soler added to party Juan Baltazar(pty:res), Attorney Andrew M. Soler added to party Todd Blanche(pty:res), Attorney Andrew M. Soler added to party Markwayne Mullin(pty:res), Attorney Andrew M. Soler added to party George Valdez(pty:res), Attorney Andrew M. Soler added to party David Venturella(pty:res). (Soler, Andrew) (Entered: 10/26/2026)

#10

Oct 26, 2026

MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond re 1 Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus, by Respondents Juan Baltazar, Todd Blanche, Markwayne Mullin, George Valdez, David Venturella. (Weinberg, Anh) (Entered: 10/26/2026)

#11

Oct 30, 2026

ORDER: Before the Court is Petitioner's 1 Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus. In their Response, Respondents state that they "are not submitting a brief in opposition to the Petition detailing the facts and circumstances of this case." Dkt. 9, p.2. Where, as here, "a party files a response to a motion but does not address all arguments which the motion raises, the party has effectively conceded the arguments which it does not address." Alfaro Herrera v. Baltazar, No. 1:25-cv-04014-CNS, 2026 WL 91470, at *5 (D. Colo. Jan. 13, 2026) (quoting Series 17-03-615 v. Teva Pharms. USA, Inc., 785 F. Supp. 3d 904, 935 (D. Kan. 2025)); see also C1.G ex rel C.G. v. Siegfried, 38 F.4th 1270, 1282 (10th Cir. 2022). Accordingly, Petitioner's Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus is GRANTED.In addition, Respondents state that appropriate relief in this matter would be to order Petitioner's release, and the Court agrees. Therefore, Respondents SHALL immediately release Petitioner under the same conditions of his original release. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, in light of the confessed due process violation, Respondents are ENJOINED from re-arresting or re-detaining Petitioner unless they demonstrate, by clear and convincing evidence at a pre-deprivation bond hearing before a neutral decisionmaker, that he is a flight risk or danger to the community such that his physical custody is legally justified. At any such bond hearing, Respondents shall bear the burden of proof, and Petitioner shall be allowed to have counsel present. This injunction shall remain in effect until such time as this Court, or the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals, vacates this Order. The Court has also considered Petitioner's request for an Order to Show Cause why sanctions should not be entered and has reviewed the attached Exhibit from Soares v. Baltazar, No. 1:26-cv-03175 (D. Colo. Sept. 18, 2026). Based on this and a consideration of the record as a whole, the Court concludes an Order to Show Cause is not warranted at this time. Thus, Respondents' Motion for additional time to respond is denied as MOOT. Petitioner's request for a Temporary Restraining Order is also MOOT. Respondents SHALL FILE a status report within FIVE DAYS of this Order certifying Petitioner's release. SO ORDERED by Judge S. Kato Crews on 10/30/2026. Text Only Entry (skclc1) (Entered: 10/30/2026)

Oct 30, 2026

Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond AND Order on Motion for TRO

#15

Nov 04, 2026

Judgment

Nov 04, 2026

Order