Southern District of California • 3:26-cv-05806

#1

Oct 12, 2026

Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus against Todd Blanche, Christopher LaRose, Markwayne Mullin, David J. Venturella ( Filing fee $ 5 receipt number ACASDC-21741976.), filed by Wilguer Saintilus. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet, # 2 Exhibit I-94, # 3 Exhibit I-589 Receipt, # 4 Exhibit TPS receipt)The new case number is 3:26-cv-5806-JAO-DEB. Judge Jill Aiko Otake and Magistrate Judge Daniel E. Butcher are assigned to the case. (Monsalve, Alejandro)(anh) (Entered: 10/13/2026)

#2

Oct 13, 2026

MINUTE ORDER: The Court adopts the Standard Procedures for this Immigration Habeas Petition from Chief Judge Order No. 144, which is available on the court's website. (no document attached) (eacp) (Entered: 10/13/2026)

#3

Oct 13, 2026

NOTICE of Appearance and Substitution of Counsel by Jacob Tyler Metzger on behalf of Todd Blanche, Christopher LaRose, Markwayne Mullin, David J. Venturella (Metzger, Jacob)Attorney Jacob Tyler Metzger added to party Todd Blanche(pty:res), Attorney Jacob Tyler Metzger added to party Christopher LaRose(pty:res), Attorney Jacob Tyler Metzger added to party Markwayne Mullin(pty:res), Attorney Jacob Tyler Metzger added to party David J. Venturella(pty:res) (anh). (Entered: 10/13/2026)

Oct 13, 2026

Order

#4

Oct 19, 2026

RETURN to Petition for Writ of H/C by Todd Blanche, Christopher LaRose, Markwayne Mullin, David J. Venturella. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit)(Metzger, Jacob)(anh). (Entered: 10/19/2026)

#5

Oct 20, 2026

TRAVERSE to Petition for Writ of H/C by Wilguer Saintilus filed by Wilguer Saintilus. (Monsalve, Alejandro) (anh). (Entered: 10/20/2026)

#6

Oct 23, 2026

ORDER Granting Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus [ECF No. 1 ]. Signed by Judge Jill Aiko Otake on 10/25/2026.(anh) (Entered: 10/25/2026)

#7

Oct 25, 2026

CLERK'S JUDGMENT. IT IS SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Court GRANTS Petitioners Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (ECF No. 1) on due process grounds, and ORDERS Respondents to immediately release Petitioner from custody subject to the conditions of his preexisting parole. The Court ORDERS, prior to any re-detention of Petitioner, that Petitioner is entitled to notice of the reasons for revocation of his parole and a hearing before a neutral decision maker to determine whether detention is warranted. The government shall bear the burden of establishing, by clear and convincing evidence, that Petitioner poses a danger to the community or a risk of flight.(anh) (Entered: 10/25/2026)

#8

Oct 27, 2026

Status Report