District of Massachusetts • 1:26-cv-14575

#1

Oct 08, 2026

First PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2241) Filing fee: $ 5, receipt number AMADC-12098258 Fee status: Filing Fee paid., filed by Luiz Alexander Ramas Ortiz. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet, # 2 Category Form)(Silvia, Corey) (Entered: 10/08/2026)

#2

Oct 08, 2026

ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. District Judge Angel Kelley assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge M. Page Kelley. (MBM) (Entered: 10/08/2026)

#3

Oct 08, 2026

District Judge Angel Kelley: ORDER entered. Order Concerning Service of Petition, Stay of Transfer or Removal, and Required Response. (CEH) (Entered: 10/08/2026)

#4

Oct 08, 2026

General Order 19-02, dated June 1, 2019 regarding Public Access to Immigration Cases Restricted by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2(c). (CEH) (Entered: 10/08/2026)

#5

Oct 08, 2026

District Judge Angel Kelley: ORDER entered. Standing Order Regarding Motion Practice. (CEH) (Entered: 10/08/2026)

#6

Oct 08, 2026

Copy re 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2241), 3 Service Order - 2241 Petition emailed to AUSA Steven Sharobem, Rayford Farquhar, and USAMA Civil Process on 10/8/2026 at 4:04 pm and mailed to all respondents (CEH) (Entered: 10/08/2026)

Oct 08, 2026

Copy Mailed

Oct 08, 2026

Notice of Case Assignment

#7

Oct 12, 2026

RESPONSE/ANSWER to 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2241), by Michael Krol, Antone Moniz, Markwayne Mullin. (Tolkoff, Benjamin) (Entered: 10/12/2026)

#8

Oct 13, 2026

District Judge Angel Kelley: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered. Before the Court is Petitioner Luiz Alexander Ramas Ortiz’s Emergency Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. [Dkt. 1]. Respondents acknowledge that Petitioner is eligible for a bond hearing conducted pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1226(a) under the binding decision in Guerrero Orellana v. Moniz, No. 25-2152, 2026 WL 2352042 (1st Cir. Aug. 13, 2026). [Dkt. 7]. In Guerrero Orellana v. Moniz, the First Circuit held that the arrest and detention of noncitizens within the United States is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1226(a). On the facts before it, the Court does not find reason to deviate from the analysis presented in Guerrero Orellana. Accordingly, Petitioner is subject to 8 U.S.C. § 1226’s discretionary detention framework and entitled to a bond hearing. He has not received such a hearing, so his detention is unlawful. Petitioner’s Petition [Dkt. 1] is GRANTED. Respondents are ORDERED to provide Petitioner with a bond hearing under 8 U.S.C. § 1226(a) within ten (10) calendar days of this Order, unless Petitioner requests an extension. Respondents are ENJOINED from denying Petitioner bond on the basis that he is detained pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1225(b)(2). Respondents are ORDERED to file a status report within fourteen (14) calendar days of this Order stating whether Petitioner has been granted bond, and, if his request for bond was denied, the reasons for that denial.(CEH) (Entered: 10/13/2026)

#9

Oct 13, 2026

NOTICE of Appearance by Benjamin Tolkoff on behalf of Michael Krol, Antone Moniz, Markwayne Mullin, David J. Venturella, David Wesling (Tolkoff, Benjamin) (Entered: 10/13/2026)

Oct 13, 2026

Order

#10

Oct 26, 2026

STATUS REPORT by Michael Krol, Antone Moniz, Markwayne Mullin, David J. Venturella, David Wesling. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Bond Order)(Tolkoff, Benjamin) (Entered: 10/26/2026)

#11

Oct 27, 2026

District Judge Angel Kelley: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered. On October 13, 2026, this Court granted Petitioner’s Habeas Petition. [Dkt. 8]. On October 26, 2026, Respondents provided a Status Report indicating that Petitioner had a bond hearing on October 22, 2026 and was granted bond. [Dkt. 10]. As a result, absent objection within the next seven (7) calendar days, the Court will terminate the suit. Any objection may address, among other things, whether the bond hearing complied with the requirements of Hernandez-Lara v. Lyons, 10 F.4th 19 (1st Cir. 2021). The Court retains jurisdiction for seven calendar days to consider any timely objections.(CEH) (Entered: 10/27/2026)

Oct 27, 2026

Order

#12

Nov 05, 2026

Order Dismissing Case