District of New Mexico • 1:26-cv-03350

Xiong v. Warden

Active

Case Information

Filed: October 06, 2026
Assigned to: Sarah M. Davenport
Referred to: John Robbenhaar
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee
Cause: 28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Active
Last Activity: October 26, 2026
Parties: View All Parties →

Docket Entries

#1
Oct 06, 2026
PETITION for a Writ of Habeas Corpus Under 28 U.S.C. 2241, filed by Vang Seng Xiong. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Wang, Tiffany) (Entered: 10/06/2026)
Main Document: Petition for 2241 Relief
#2
Oct 06, 2026
NOTICE: In accordance with the Standing Order, filed January 28, 2026 in 26-MC-00004-03 (Doc. 3), the Clerk of Court provides notice of completion of electronic service. A copy of the petition in this matter was provided to all federal respondents by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) using the Case Management and Electronic Case Filing (CM/ECF) system. The parties should review the Standing Order, and any further Orders entered in this matter regarding the deadline to respond to the petition. (dr)[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] (Entered: 10/06/2026)
Oct 06, 2026
United States District Judge Sarah M Davenport and United States Magistrate Judge John F. Robbenhaar assigned. (dr)
#3
Oct 07, 2026
Filing fee: $ 5, receipt number 1012279 (dr)[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] (Entered: 10/07/2026)
Oct 07, 2026
Filing Fee Received
#4
Oct 09, 2026
ORDER TO ANSWER by District Judge Sarah M. Davenport:The Court has reviewed the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. The Court has previously addressed the legal issues raised by the Petition. The Court intends to rule directly on the Petition. See 28 U.S.C. § 2243 ("The court shall summarily hear and determine the facts, and dispose of [the habeas petition] as law and justice require.").On or before October 23, 2026, Respondents are ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE as to whether there are any factual or legal issues in this case that distinguish it from the Court's prior orders and justify denying the Petition, or otherwise indicate the matter is not substantively distinguishable. The Government is prohibited from transferring or removing Petitioner from the District of New Mexico while this case remains pending.The Clerk's Office shall confirm that the docket lists the following Respondents: the facility Warden; the El Paso Field Office Director, Enforcement and Removal Operations; the U.S. Attorney General; the Acting Director, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement; and Markwayne Mullin, Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security. [THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. NO DOCUMENTS ARE ATTACHED.] (xj) (Entered: 10/09/2026)
Oct 09, 2026
Order to Answer
#5
Oct 16, 2026
NOTICE of Appearance by Paul Vicary on behalf of Acting Director, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, El Paso Field Office Director, Enforcement and Removal Operations, Markwayne Mullin, U.S. Attorney General (Vicary, Paul) (Entered: 10/16/2026)
Main Document: NOTICE
#6
Oct 16, 2026
RESPONSE to Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus re 1 Petition for 2241 Relief filed by Acting Director, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, El Paso Field Office Director, Enforcement and Removal Operations, Markwayne Mullin, U.S. Attorney General. (Vicary, Paul) (Entered: 10/16/2026)
Main Document: Response (when not to a motion)
#7
Oct 21, 2026
MOTION to Expedite Consideration of Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by Vang Seng Xiong. (Wang, Tiffany) (Entered: 10/21/2026)
Main Document: Expedite
#8
Oct 21, 2026
DECLARATION re 7 MOTION to Expedite Consideration of Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus of Tiffany Wang by Vang Seng Xiong (Wang, Tiffany) (Entered: 10/21/2026)
Main Document: Declaration
#9
Oct 26, 2026
RESPONSE to Motion re 7 MOTION to Expedite Consideration of Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Acting Director, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, El Paso Field Office Director, Enforcement and Removal Operations, Markwayne Mullin, U.S. Attorney General. (Vicary, Paul) (Entered: 10/26/2026)
Main Document: Response to Motion

Parties

Mullin
Party
Xiong
Party
Firm