District of Colorado • 1:26-cv-04969

#1

Oct 05, 2026

APPLICATION for Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 USC 2241 (Filing fee $ 5.00, Receipt Number 119850), filed by Gilbert Jose Miranda Cruz. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit, # 2 Receipt, # 3 Envelope)(echa, ) (Entered: 10/06/2026)

#2

Oct 05, 2026

Emergency MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction to Prevent Transfer Pending Final Disposition of Habeas Petition by Petitioner Gilbert Jose Miranda Cruz. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order (PDF Only), # 2 Envelope)(echa, ) (Entered: 10/06/2026)

#3

Oct 05, 2026

Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Richard T. Gurley for Initial Review pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 8.1 (b). Text Only Entry. (echa, ) (Entered: 10/06/2026)

#4

Oct 08, 2026

ORDER DRAWING CASE by Magistrate Judge Richard T. Gurley on 10/08/2026. After review pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 8.1(b), the court has determined that this case does not appear to be appropriate for summary dismissal. Therefore, the case will be drawn to a presiding judge and, if applicable, to a magistrate judge. See D.C.COLO.LCivR 8.1(c). Accordingly, it is ORDERED that this case shall be drawn to a presiding judge and, if applicable, to a magistrate judge. (This case is randomly reassigned to District Judge Charlotte N. Sweeney and drawn to Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak for all further proceedings. All future pleadings should be designated as 26-cv-04969-CNS.) For all non-e-filer pro se parties, a copy of this document has been sent via U.S. Mail to the mailing address of record. (pklin, ) (Entered: 10/08/2026)

#5

Oct 09, 2026

MINUTE ORDER: Before the Court is Petitioner Gilbert Jose Miranda Cruz's Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241, ECF No. 1, and Emergency Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction, ECF No. 2, in which Petitioner requests immediate release from immigration detention or, in the alternative, that the Court order Respondents to provide Petitioner with an individualized bond hearing, ECF No. 1 at 10; ECF No. 2 at 6. Having reviewed the petition, the Court will order the Clerk of Court to effectuate service on Respondents. Within five (5) calendar days of service, Respondents are ORDERED TO RESPOND to the Petition and are ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE as to why the Petition should not be granted. See, e.g., Yassine v. Collins, No. 1:25-cv-00786-ADA-SH, 2025 WL 1954064, at *1 (W.D. Tex. July 7, 2025) (explaining that while § 2243 refers to a three day deadline, this requirement is "subordinate to the district court's authority to set deadlines" itself, and granting respondents a fourteen day deadline to respond in order to "give [r]espondents adequate time to brief the issues" (quotations omitted)). Further, pursuant to the All Writs Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1651(a), and in order to preserve the Court's jurisdiction, Respondents SHALL NOT REMOVE Petitioner from the District of Colorado or the United States unless or until this Court or the Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit vacates this Order. See also Vizguerra-Ramirez v. Choate, et. al, Case No. 1:25-cv-881, D. Colo., ECF No. 11 at 45 (collecting cases); F.T.C. v. Dean Foods Co., 384 U.S. 597, 603 (1966); Local 1814, Int'l Longshoremen's Ass'n v. New York Shipping Ass'n, 965 F.2d 1224, 1237 (2d Cir. 1992). By Judge Charlotte N. Sweeney on 10/09/26. For all non-e-filer pro se parties, a copy of this document has been sent via U.S. Mail to the mailing address of record. Text Only Entry (cnslc9, ) (Entered: 10/09/2026)

Oct 09, 2026

Minute Order

Oct 21, 2026

Order

#11

Oct 23, 2026

Judgment

Oct 23, 2026

Minute Order