Eastern District of California • 1:26-cv-08148

Oct 02, 2026

PAYMENT for habeas petition filing fee in the amount of $ 5, receipt number ACAEDC-13962357. (Berdugo, Jonathan)

#1

Oct 05, 2026

PETITION for WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS against All Respondents by Maria Emilia Gonzalez Gomez. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibits A-C, # 2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Berdugo, Jonathan) Modified on 10/9/2026 (HAH). (Entered: 10/05/2026)

#2

Oct 05, 2026

IMMIGRATION NEW CASE DOCUMENTS (Attachments: # 1 Consent Form) (Deputy Clerk SZ) (Entered: 10/05/2026)

#3

Oct 05, 2026

MINUTE ORDER issued by Courtroom Deputy for Chief District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 10/5/2026: This matter is REFERRED to the assigned U.S. Magistrate Judge for further proceedings pursuant to Local Rule 302 and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). Pending the Court's ruling on the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, Respondents shall NOT TRANSFER Petitioner out of this District. See F.T.C. v. Dean Foods Co., 384 U.S. 597, 608 (1966) (noting the Court's "express authority under the All Writs Act to issue such temporary injunctions as may be necessary to protect its own jurisdiction."). (TEXT ONLY ENTRY) (Deputy Clerk MDK) (Entered: 10/05/2026)

#4

Oct 05, 2026

DESIGNATION of COUNSEL FOR SERVICE. Added attorney Elisa M. Rodriguez for Respondents. (Rodriguez, Elisa) Modified on 10/9/2026 (HAH). (Entered: 10/05/2026)

Oct 05, 2026

Minute Order

#5

Oct 06, 2026

MINUTE ORDER issued by Relief Courtroom Deputy for Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 10/6/2026: Petitioner, Maria Emilia Gonzalez Gomez (A# 235-675-551), through counsel, filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241, and paid the filing fee. The petition asserts petitioner's detention violates the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA). ECF No. 1 . The Ninth Circuit recently ruled that "[noncitizens] present without admission who are apprehended in the interior of the United States are subject to detention regime of § 1226, not § 1225(b)(2)(A)." Rodriguez Vazquez v. Bostock, 183 F.4th 1160, 1165 (9th Cir. 2026). Respondents are therefore directed to file a response within 7 days from the date of this order (see 28 U.S.C. § 2243), which shall substantively address whether there are any factual or legal issues that materially distinguish this case from Rodriguez Vazquez v. Bostock or the court's prior orders in Morales-Flores v. Lyons, No. 1:25-cv-1640 TLN EFB, 2025 WL 3552841 (E.D. Cal. Dec. 11, 2025), Brayan C.C. v. Warden of California City Corr. Ctr., No. 2:26-cv-0641 TLN JDP, 2026 WL 710358 (E.D. Cal. Mar. 13, 2026), Satvir S. v. Noem, No. 1:26-cv-00157 TLN JDP, 2026 WL 84084 (E.D. Cal. Jan. 12, 2026), and other similar cases previously decided by this court, or otherwise indicate that the matter is not substantively distinguishable. The court will construe failure to distinguish the above-cited cases as a concession that the cases are not substantively distinguishable. The response shall include petitioner's Form I-213 for each immigration encounter, any orders of release or detention, any custody warrants, notices, or decisions, and if respondents dispute any factual representations in the operative petition, any and all documents necessary to support their view of the facts. Petitioner's reply, if any, is due within 7 days of being served a copy of the respondents' response. (Text Only Entry) (Deputy Clerk MCF) (Entered: 10/06/2026)

Oct 06, 2026

Minute Order AND ~Util - 1 Set/Reset Deadlines and Hearings

#6

Oct 09, 2026

NOTICE of VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL by Maria Emilia Gonzalez Gomez. (Berdugo, Jonathan) (Entered: 10/09/2026)

Oct 29, 2026

Notice of Voluntary Dismissal