Eastern District of California • 1:26-cv-07749
(HC) Marin v. Warden, Mesa Verde Detention Facility
Active
Case Information
Filed: September 18, 2026
Assigned to:
Troy Lynne Nunley
Referred to:
Chi Soo Kim
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee
Cause:
8:1105(a) Aliens: Habeas Corpus to Release INS Detainee
Active
Last Activity:
October 29, 2026
Parties:
View All Parties →
Docket Entries
#1
Sep 24, 2026
Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Main Document:
Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
#2
Sep 24, 2026
In Forma Pauperis
Main Document:
In Forma Pauperis
#3
Sep 24, 2026
Appoint Counsel
Main Document:
Appoint Counsel
Sep 24, 2026
Minute Order
Sep 24, 2026
Service by Mail
#6
Sep 28, 2026
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Chi Soo Kim on 9/28/2026 GRANTING 2 Motion to Proceed IFP. Respondents are directed to file an answer or motion to dismiss within 7 days from the date of this order. Respondents are warned that the failure to resp ond to the petition will be interpreted as non-opposition to granting the relief requested in the habeas petition. Petitioner's reply/traverse to an answer or opposition to a motion to dismiss, if any, is due within 10 days after being serve d with a copy of respondents' answer or motion to dismiss. A reply by respondents to an opposition to a motion to dismiss is due within 7 days after being served with the opposition. Each party proceeding without counsel shall keep the court informed of the current address at all times while the action is pending. (Deputy Clerk LMS)
Sep 28, 2026
Service by Mail
#7
Oct 05, 2026
Answer to Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Main Document:
Answer to Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
#8
Oct 29, 2026
ORDER AND FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Chi Soo Kim on 10/28/2026 DENYING petitioner's 3 motion for appointment of counsel without prejudice. IT IS RECOMMENDED that the 1 petition for writ of habeas corpu s be granted as to the statutory claim; Respondents be ordered to provide petitioner Jorge Marin Marin (A-240-174-181) with a constitutionally adequate bond hearing before an immigration judge/neutral decisionmaker within 14 days of the adoption of these findings and recommendations where petitioner bears the burden of establishing by clear and convincing evidence that petitioner does not pose a danger to the community or a risk of flight; Respondents must provide petitioner and if petit ioner has counsel, also petitioner's counsel, with at least 7 days' notice before the bond hearing; If petitioner has counsel, petitioner shall be allowed to have counsel present at any such hearing; Given petitioner's pro se stat us, respondents be directed to file, within 14 days of the adoption of these findings and recommendations, a status report addressing petitioner's status; The Clerk of the Court be directed to enter judgment in favor of petitioner and close this case. Referred to Judge Troy L. Nunley. Objections to F&R due within 7 days. (Deputy Clerk KLY)
Oct 29, 2026
Service by Mail
Parties
(HC) Marin
Party
Warden, Mesa Verde Detention Facility
Party