Eastern District of California • 1:26-cv-08034

(HC) Kumar v. Warden, Facility Administrator of Golden State Annex

Active

Case Information

Filed: September 29, 2026
Assigned to: Kirk E. Sherriff
Referred to: Frank J. Singer
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee
Cause: 8:1105(a) Aliens: Habeas Corpus to Release INS Detainee
Active
Last Activity: October 19, 2026
Parties: View All Parties →

Docket Entries

#1
Sep 29, 2026
PETITION for WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS against Sergio Albarran, Todd Blanche, Markwayne Mullin, David Venturella, Warden at Golden State Annex by Amit Kumar. (Filing fee $ 5, receipt number ACAEDC-13946719) (Attachments: # 1 Cover, # 2 Evidence)(Kaur, Simranjit) (Entered: 09/29/2026)
Main Document: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
#2
Sep 30, 2026
IMMIGRATION NEW CASE DOCUMENTS. (Attachments: # 1 Consent Form) (Deputy Clerk SZ) (Entered: 09/30/2026)
Main Document: Immigration New Case Documents
#3
Sep 30, 2026
DESIGNATION of COUNSEL FOR SERVICE. Added attorney Anthony Andrews for Sergio Albarran,Anthony Andrews for Todd Blanche,Anthony Andrews for Markwayne Mullin,Anthony Andrews for David Venturella,Anthony Andrews for Warden, Facility Administrator of Golden State Annex (Andrews, Anthony) (Entered: 09/30/2026)
Main Document: DESIGNATION
#4
Oct 01, 2026
ORDER to Respond; ORDER Setting Briefing Schedule; ORDER to Electronically File Transcripts and Other Necessary Documents, signed by Magistrate Judge Frank J. Singer on 10/1/2026. Within TWENTY-ONE (21) days of the date of service of this order, Respondents SHALL FILE a RESPONSE to the Petition, including the statutory basis for Petitioner's detention, and addressing whether this case is distinguishable from recent analogous cases in which this court has granted habeas relief. Within TWENTY-ONE (21) days after service of this order, Respondents SHALL FILE all transcripts or other documents necessary for the resolution of the issues presented in the Petition. See Rule 5(c), Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases. (Deputy Clerk ED) (Entered: 10/01/2026)
Main Document: 06 - HC/Order Requiring Respondent to File a Response AND ~Util - 1 Terminate Deadlines and Hearings
#5
Oct 02, 2026
CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Anonymous) (Entered: 10/02/2026)
Main Document: CONSENT/DECLINE
#6
Oct 02, 2026
MOTION for TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER by Amit Kumar. (Attachments: # 1 Tro Checklist, # 2 Attorney Dec)(Kaur, Simranjit) (Entered: 10/02/2026)
Main Document: Temporary Restraining Order
#7
Oct 02, 2026
MINUTE ORDER signed by District Judge Kirk E. Sherriff on 10/2/2026: (Text Only Entry). The Court has reviewed the 1 petition for writ of habeas corpus and 6 motion for temporary restraining order. The Court has previously addressed the legal issues raised by claim two of the 1 petition. See e.g., Luis Alberto R.C. v. Murray, 817 F. Supp. 3d 917 (E.D. Cal. 2025); Elmer Joel M. C. v. Wofford, No. 1:25-CV-01622-KES-CDB (HC), 2025 WL 3501200 (E.D. Cal. Dec. 6, 2025); W.V.S.M. v. Wofford, No. 1:25-CV-01489-KES-HBK (HC), 2025 WL 3236521 (E.D. Cal. Nov. 19, 2025); Bilal A. v. Wofford, No. 1:25-CV-01715-KES-HBK (HC), 2025 WL 3648366 (E.D. Cal. Dec. 16, 2025); Marina V.N. v. Robbins, No. 1:25-CV-01845-KES-SKO (HC), 2025 WL 3701960 (E.D. Cal. Dec. 21, 2025). The Court intends to rule directly on the 1 petition for writ of habeas corpus, with the understanding that the Court will also consider any arguments made and exhibits submitted in support of the 6 motion for temporary restraining order. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 65(a)(2) ("Before or after beginning the hearing on a motion for a preliminary injunction, the court may advance the trial on the merits and consolidate it with the hearing."); see also 28 U.S.C. § 2243 ("The court shall summarily hear and determine the facts, and dispose of [a petitioner's habeas petition] as law and justice require."); Dzhabrailov v. Decker, No. 20-CV-3118 (PMH), 2020 WL 2731966, at *4 (S.D.N.Y. May 26, 2020) (considering preliminary injunction and merits of habeas petition simultaneously). On or before October 6, 2026, respondents are ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE as to whether there are any factual or legal issues in this case that distinguish it from the Court's prior orders in Luis Alberto R.C. v. Murray, Elmer Joel M. C. v. Wofford, W.V.S.M. v. Wofford, Bilal A. v. Wofford, and Marina V.N. v. Robbins and justify denying the petition, or indicate the matter is not substantively distinguishable. Pending the Court's decision, and unless and until the Court orders otherwise, the Court ORDERS that respondents shall not transfer petitioner out of this District. See F.T.C. v. Dean Foods Co., 384 U.S. 597, 604 (1966) (noting court's "express authority under the All Writs Act to issue such temporary injunctions as may be necessary to protect its own jurisdiction"). This order does not prohibit the temporary transfer of petitioner outside of the District for urgent medical care, though petitioner shall be returned to the District upon the conclusion of such care. Respondents shall notify the Court of any such transfer out of the district. (gm) (Entered: 10/02/2026)
Oct 02, 2026
Minute Order
Oct 05, 2026
Minute Order AND ~Util - 1 Terminate Deadlines and Hearings
#11
Oct 18, 2026
ORDER GRANTING PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS AND REQUIRING IMMEDIATE RELEASE signed by District Judge Kirk E. Sherriff on 10/18/2026. (gm)
Main Document: Order
#12
Oct 19, 2026
Judgment
Main Document: Judgment