Eastern District of California • 1:26-cv-08013

#1

Sep 28, 2026

PETITION for WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS against California City Immigration Processing Center by Anibal Arango Rodriguez. (Deputy Clerk GDD) (Entered: 09/30/2026)

#2

Sep 30, 2026

IMMIGRATION NEW CASE DOCUMENTS (Attachments: # 1 Litigant Letter) (Deputy Clerk GDD) (Entered: 09/30/2026)

#3

Sep 30, 2026

MINUTE ORDER issued by Courtroom Deputy for Chief District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 9/30/2026: This matter is REFERRED to the assigned U.S. Magistrate Judge for further proceedings pursuant to Local Rule 302 and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). Pending the Court's ruling on the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, Respondents shall NOT TRANSFER Petitioner out of this District. See F.T.C. v. Dean Foods Co., 384 U.S. 597, 608 (1966) (noting the Court's "express authority under the All Writs Act to issue such temporary injunctions as may be necessary to protect its own jurisdiction."). (TEXT ONLY ENTRY) (Deputy Clerk MDK) (Entered: 09/30/2026)

#4

Sep 30, 2026

MINUTE ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Jeremy D. Peterson on 9/30/2026: Petitioner, an immigration detainee, filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. Under Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases, the court must examine the habeas corpus petition and order a response to the petition unless it "plainly appears" that the petitioner is not entitled to relief. It does not plainly appear that petitioner is not entitled to relief. Therefore, the court orders the government to respond to the petition and sets a briefing schedule. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. Within seven days of this order's service, respondent must file an answer to the petition. The answer must address the merits of the petition and set forth the "true cause of the detention." See 28 U.S.C. § 2243. Any argument by respondent that petitioner has procedurally defaulted a claim must be raised in the answer, which must also address the merits of petitioner's claims. Respondent shall attach any documents necessary for resolving the issues presented in the petition. Arguments that are not supported with relevant evidence will not be considered. 2. Petitioner may file a traverse to respondent's answer within seven days of the date of service of that answer. If no traverse is filed within seven days, the petition and answer are deemed submitted. 3. If respondent learns of petitioner's removal or any other change in petitioner's detention status, respondent shall submit a status report notifying the court as soon as practicably possible. 4. The Clerk of Court is directed to send petitioner a copy of the in forma pauperis form used by this district. Petitioner shall submit, within thirty days from the date of this order, an affidavit in support of a request to proceed in forma pauperis or the appropriate filing fee of $5.00. (Text Only Entry). (Deputy Clerk NAC) (Entered: 09/30/2026)

#5

Sep 30, 2026

DESIGNATION of COUNSEL FOR SERVICE. Added attorney Jonathan Williams, GOVT for California City Immigration Processing Center (Williams, Jonathan) (Entered: 09/30/2026)

#6

Sep 30, 2026

NOTICE of Duplicate Petition by California City Immigration Processing Center. (Williams, Jonathan) Modified on 10/7/2026 (HAH). (Entered: 09/30/2026)

Sep 30, 2026

SERVICE BY MAIL: 2 Immigration New Case Documents served on Anibal Arango Rodriguez. (Deputy Clerk GDD)

Sep 30, 2026

SERVICE BY MAIL: 4 Minute Order served on Anibal Arango Rodriguez. (Deputy Clerk NAC)

Sep 30, 2026

SERVICE BY MAIL: 3 Minute Order served on Anibal Arango Rodriguez. (Deputy Clerk MDK)

Sep 30, 2026

Minute Order

Sep 30, 2026

Service by Mail

#7

Oct 01, 2026

MINUTE ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Jeremy D. Peterson on 10/1/2026: On 9/30/2026, respondent answered the petition by noting that it is related to another habeas matter and requesting that this petition be dismissed as duplicative. ECF No. 6 . Respondent is hereby ORDERED to file a notice of related cases in this action and the related action pursuant to Local Rule 123(b) within seven days of this order. (Text Only Entry). (Deputy Clerk NAC) (Entered: 10/01/2026)

#8

Oct 01, 2026

DESIGNATION of COUNSEL FOR SERVICE. Added attorney Anthony Andrews for California City Immigration Processing Center, attorney Jonathan Williams, GOVT terminated (Williams, Jonathan) (Entered: 10/01/2026)

#9

Oct 01, 2026

NOTICE of RELATED CASE(S) 1:26-cv-07761-DJC-CKD by California City Immigration Processing Center. (Williams, Jonathan) (Entered: 10/01/2026)

#10

Oct 01, 2026

MINUTE ORDER issued by Courtroom Deputy for District Judge Daniel J. Calabretta on 10/1/2026: This case has been initiated by the same Petitioner who initiated a prior action, Case No. 1:26-cv-07761-DJC-CKD (HC), related to Petitioner's present immigration custody status. Pursuant to Local Rule 123, the Court finds that this action is related to the prior action because both cases involve overlapping parties, properties, claims, events and/or questions of fact or law. Accordingly, assignment of the actions to the same District Judge and Magistrate Judge who were assigned to the consolidated action will promote convenience, efficiency, and economy for the Court and parties. Thus, the Court ORDERS that this case be reassigned to District Judge Daniel J. Calabretta and Chief Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney. All future filings shall use the following Case Number: 1:26-cv-08013-DJC-CKD (HC). (cc: TLN, JDP) [TEXT ONLY ENTRY] (Deputy Clerk GJM) (Entered: 10/01/2026)

#11

Oct 01, 2026

MINUTE ORDER issued by Courtroom Deputy for District Judge Daniel J. Calabretta on 10/1/2026: In light of the order dismissing Case No. 1:26-cv-07761-DJC-CKD (HC), the Court DENIES Respondents' request to dismiss this case as duplicative. (ECF No. 6 .) On review the issues raised in the Petition in this case (ECF No. 1 ) appear to mirror those previously addressed by the Court in many prior cases. Specifically, it appears that Petitioner's prior release from custody created a liberty interest that entitles Petitioner to pre-deprivation notice and opportunity to be heard. See Garcia Mariagua v. Chestnut, No. 1:25-cv-01744-DJC-CSK; Ortega v. Noem, No. 1:25-cv-01663-DJC-CKD; Lopez v. Lyons, No. 2:25-cv-03174-DJC-CKD; see also M.B. v. Noem, 1:26-cv-00005-DJC-AC; Oli v. Andrews, No. 1:26-cv-00477-DJC-AC. Respondents are ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE on or before October 6, 2026, as to why the Court should not grant a writ of habeas corpus and order Petitioner's release based on the violation of Petitioner's due process rights by filing a return as provided in 28 U.S.C. § 2243. This matter is not set for a hearing though the Court may set one should it later be determined that a hearing is necessary. [TEXT ONLY ENTRY] (Deputy Clerk GJM) (Entered: 10/01/2026)

Oct 01, 2026

Minute Order

Oct 01, 2026

SERVICE BY MAIL: 10 Minute Order served on Anibal Arango Rodriguez. (Deputy Clerk GJM)

Oct 01, 2026

SERVICE BY MAIL: 11 Minute Order served on Anibal Arango Rodriguez. (Deputy Clerk GJM)

Oct 01, 2026

Service by Mail

Oct 01, 2026

Minute Order AND ~Util - 1 Set/Reset Deadlines and Hearings

Oct 01, 2026

SERVICE BY MAIL: 7 Minute Order served on Anibal Arango Rodriguez. (Deputy Clerk NAC)

#12

Oct 06, 2026

RESPONSE by California City Immigration Processing Center to 11 Minute Order,,,,,, Set/Reset Deadlines and Hearings,,,,, 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. (Andrews, Anthony) (Entered: 10/06/2026)

#13

Oct 09, 2026

ORDER signed by District Judge Daniel J. Calabretta on 10/8/2026 GRANTING 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. Within 14 days of this Order, Respondents shall afford Petitioner Anibal Arango Rodriguez a constitutionally adequate bond hearing be fore an Immigration Judge. The Government shall bear the burden of establishing, by clear and convincing evidence, that Petitioner poses a danger to the community or risk of flight, and Petitioner shall be allowed to have counsel present. If Petition er is not provided a bond hearing in this time, Respondents are ordered to immediately release Petitioner from their custody. Respondents shall file a status report within 5 days of Petitioner's bond hearing, confirming a bond hearing was conducted. CASE CLOSED. (Deputy Clerk JJD)

#14

Oct 09, 2026

JUDGMENT dated *10/9/2026* pursuant to order signed by District Judge Daniel J. Calabretta on 10/8/2026 in favor of Petitioner against Respondents. (Deputy Clerk JJD) (Entered: 10/09/2026)

Oct 09, 2026

SERVICE BY MAIL: 13 Order and 14 Judgment served on Anibal Arango Rodriguez. (Deputy Clerk JJD)

Oct 09, 2026

Service by Mail

Oct 19, 2026

Service by Mail