Central District of California • 5:26-cv-05754

#1

Sep 25, 2026

PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person In Federal Custody (28:2241) (Filing fee $ 5 FEE DUE), filed by Petitioner Nicole Tatiana Duran Garcia. (car) (Entered: 09/29/2026)

#2

Sep 25, 2026

CONSENT TO PROCEED before Magistrate Judge, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P 73(b), filed by Petitioner Nicole Tatiana Duran Garcia. (car) (Entered: 09/29/2026)

#3

Sep 25, 2026

REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis with Declaration in Support filed by Petitioner Nicole Tatiana Duran Garcia. (car) (Entered: 09/29/2026)

#4

Sep 29, 2026

NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to a U.S. Magistrate Judge. This case has been assigned to Magistrate Judge John D. Early. (car) (Entered: 09/29/2026)

#5

Sep 29, 2026

Notice of General Order 26-05 and Briefing Schedule. (car) (Entered: 09/29/2026)

#6

Sep 29, 2026

NOTICE OF RESOURCES FOR PRO SE LITIGANTS. (car) (Entered: 09/29/2026)

#7

Sep 29, 2026

ORDER by Magistrate Judge John D. Early: Granting 3 REQUEST to Proceed in Forma Pauperis with Declaration in Support (CV-60). (aro) (Entered: 09/29/2026)

#8

Oct 02, 2026

This action has been fully consented to according to General Order 26-05. The case will proceed before a magistrate judge. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (aro) TEXT ONLY ENTRY (Entered: 10/02/2026)

Oct 02, 2026

Immigration 2241 Full Consent

#9

Oct 07, 2026

TEXT ONLY (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER by Magistrate Judge John D. Early: Per the Notice of General Order 26-05 and Briefing Schedule issued on September 29, 2026 (Dkt. 5, "Notice"), Respondents were ordered to file a Notice of Appearance ("NOA") within 3 days and an Answer within 7 days of the date the Notice was issued. Respondents did not file a timely NOA or Answer. Respondents are advised that failure to file an NOA and Answer by October 7, 2026, will be deemed consent to the granting of the Motion. See Local Civil Rule 7-12. If a timely answer is filed, any optional reply shall be filed within 3 days of the filing of the Answer. All other provisions of the Notice remain in effect. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (aro) TEXT ONLY ENTRY (Entered: 10/07/2026)

#10

Oct 07, 2026

Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Daniel A Beck counsel for Respondents Director of L.A. Field Office ICE and ERO, ICE Director, U.S. Attorney General, U.S. DHS Secretary, Warden of Adelanto ICE Processing Center. Adding Daniel A. Beck as counsel of record for Warden of Adelanto ICE Processing Center, Director of L.A. Field Office ICE and ERO, ICE Director, U.S. DHS Secretary, U.S. Attorney General for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Respondents Warden of Adelanto ICE Processing Center, Director of L.A. Field Office ICE and ERO, ICE Director, U.S. DHS Secretary, U.S. Attorney General. (Attachments: # 1 Proof of Service)(Attorney Daniel A Beck added to party Director of L.A. Field Office ICE and ERO (pty:res), Attorney Daniel A Beck added to party ICE Director(pty:res), Attorney Daniel A Beck added to party U.S. Attorney General(pty:res), Attorney Daniel A Beck added to party U.S. DHS Secretary(pty:res), Attorney Daniel A Beck added to party Warden of Adelanto ICE Processing Center(pty:res))(Beck, Daniel) (Entered: 10/07/2026)

#11

Oct 07, 2026

RESPONSE filed by Respondents Director of L.A. Field Office ICE and ERO, ICE Director, U.S. Attorney General, U.S. DHS Secretary, Warden of Adelanto ICE Processing Centerto PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person In Federal Custody (28:2241) (Filing fee $ 5) 1 (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A - Order of Release, # 2 Exhibit B - Form I-213, # 3 Exhibit C - Warrant for Arrest, # 4 Exhibit D - Notice of Custody Determination, # 5 Proof of Service)(Beck, Daniel) (Entered: 10/07/2026)

Oct 07, 2026

Generic Text Only Entry

#12

Oct 19, 2026

Reply (Motion related)

#13

Oct 19, 2026

ORDER REGARDING PETITION by Magistrate Judge John D. Early: For the foregoing reasons, it is hereby ordered that Judgment be entered denying the Petition with prejudice, though nothing herein prevents Petitioner from requesting a bond hearing before an immigration judge. (aro)

#14

Oct 19, 2026

JUDGMENT by Magistrate Judge John D. Early: Pursuant to the Order Regarding Petition, IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the Petition is denied with prejudice. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (aro)