District of Massachusetts • 1:26-cv-14330

#1

Sep 22, 2026

PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2241) Filing fee: $ 5, receipt number AMADC-12055004 Fee status: Filing Fee paid., filed by Julio Lorenzo Alvarado. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet, # 2 Category Form)(Miller, Jacob) (Entered: 09/22/2026)

#2

Sep 22, 2026

Judge Allison D. Burroughs: ORDER entered; EMERGENCY ORDER CONCERNING STAY OF TRANSFER OR REMOVAL. (JEG) (Entered: 09/22/2026)

#3

Sep 23, 2026

ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. District Judge F. Dennis Saylor, IV assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge Jennifer C. Boal. (CAM) (Entered: 09/23/2026)

#4

Sep 23, 2026

General Order 19-02, dated June 1, 2019 regarding Public Access to Immigration Cases Restricted by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2(c). (MAC) (Entered: 09/23/2026)

#5

Sep 23, 2026

District Judge F. Dennis Saylor, IV: ORDER CONCERNING STAY OF TRANSFER OR REMOVAL entered. (MAC) (Entered: 09/23/2026)

Sep 23, 2026

Notice of Case Assignment

#6

Sep 24, 2026

Notice of Appearance

#7

Sep 29, 2026

RESPONSE/ANSWER to 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2241) by Michael Krol, Markwayne Mullin, David J. Venturella, David Wesling. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1)(McMahon, Erica) (Entered: 09/29/2026)

#8

Sep 29, 2026

Petitioner's Opposition to Respondents' Request to Dismiss the Petition as Insufficiently by Julio Lorenzo Alvarado re 7 Response to Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus - 2241 (Miller, Jacob) Modified on 9/29/2026: Corrected docket text. (MAC) (Entered: 09/29/2026)

#9

Oct 01, 2026

District Judge F. Dennis Saylor, IV: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered. The Court has reviewed the petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed by Julio Lorenzo Alvarado, a national of Mexico; the response, which includes a motion to dismiss under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8; and the opposition thereto. (Dkt. No. 1 ; Dkt. No. 7 ; Dkt. No. 8 ). The Court’s prior order directed that the “response to the petition shall address whether the First Circuit’s decision in Guerrero Orellana v. Moniz, Nos. 25-2152, 26-1094 (1st Cir. Aug. 13, 2026), controls this matter.” (Dkt. No. 5 at 1). On this point, the response states only that “it appears that Petitioner may be subject to the First Circuit’s decision in Guerrero-Orellana, No. 25-2152, 2026 WL 2352042, at *1, 7 (1st Cir. Aug. 13, 2026).” (Dkt. No. 7 at 5-6). Though respondents contend the petition is inadequately pleaded, they identify no specific factual deficiencies preventing them from “address[ing] whether” Guerrero Orellana “controls this matter,” as the Court directed. See id.; see also 28 U.S.C. § 2243 (“The person to whom the writ or order is directed shall make a return certifying the true cause of the detention.”). Indeed, the factual allegations in the petition enabled respondents to locate a criminal-history record for petitioner, demonstrating their possession of pertinent records. (Dkt. No. 7 -1). Accordingly, on or before October 5, 2026, respondents shall supplement their answer by addressing whether the First Circuit’s decision in Guerrero Orellana v. Moniz, Nos. 25-2152, 26-1094 (1st Cir. Aug. 13, 2026), controls this matter.(MAC) (Entered: 10/01/2026)

Oct 01, 2026

Order