District of Massachusetts • 1:26-cv-14305

#1

Sep 21, 2026

Second PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2241) Filing fee: $ 5, receipt number AMADC-12050912 Fee status: Filing Fee paid., filed by Dieuvens Saint Juste. (Attachments: # 1 Category Form, # 2 Civil Cover Sheet, # 3 Exhibit Detainee Locator Page, # 4 Exhibit IJ bond denial, # 5 Exhibit Evidence of changed circumstances, # 6 Exhibit Evidence of rejected bond requests)(Burns, Matthew) Modified on 9/22/2026 (Reyna-Demes, Charles). (Entered: 09/21/2026)

#2

Sep 22, 2026

ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. Judge Allison D. Burroughs assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge Donald L. Cabell. (JKK) (Entered: 09/22/2026)

#3

Sep 22, 2026

Judge Allison D. Burroughs: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered. Under Local Rule 40.1(g)(1), this matter is related to an earlier case assigned to Judge Joun, Saint Juste v. Moniz et al, No. 1:26-cv-13137-MJJ (D. Mass. filed July 8, 2026). Both District Judges consent to the designation of relatedness and to the reassignment of this case. The Clerk shall reassign this case to Judge Joun. (CAM) (Entered: 09/22/2026)

#4

Sep 22, 2026

ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Reassignment. Judge Myong J. Joun added. Judge Allison D. Burroughs no longer assigned to case. (JKK) (Entered: 09/22/2026)

#5

Sep 22, 2026

General Order 19-02, dated June 1, 2019 regarding Public Access to Immigration Cases Restricted by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2(c). (SP) (Entered: 09/22/2026)

#6

Sep 22, 2026

Judge Myong J. Joun: ORDER entered. SERVICE ORDER re 2241 Petition. Order entered pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2243 governing Section 2241 cases for service on respondents. The answer or responsive pleading is due no later than September 25, 2026. (SP) (Entered: 09/22/2026)

Sep 22, 2026

Order Reassigning Case

Sep 22, 2026

Notice of Reassignment

Sep 22, 2026

Notice of Case Assignment

#7

Sep 25, 2026

Notice of Appearance

#8

Sep 25, 2026

Answer/Response to Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus - 2241

#9

Sep 25, 2026

Response - not related to a motion

#10

Oct 02, 2026

Judge Myong J. Joun: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered. Petitioner has filed a habeas petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 to challenge the government’s failure to provide him with a subsequent bond redetermination hearing based on changed circumstances. In their Response to Habeas Petition, Doc. No. 8, Respondents argue Petitioner should wait for his most recently re-filed motion to be reviewed, but do not dispute that Petitioner is entitled to a subsequent bond redetermination hearing under 8 C.F.R. § 1003.19(e). Starting on August 17, 2026, Petitioner has attempted multiple times to request a hearing pursuant to § 1003.19(e), which simply requires that the request “be made in writing.” These requests have repeatedly been denied for reasons that Respondents fails to adequately explain and that appear to be unreasonable. Although the immigration court may enforce procedural filing rules, the Court finds in this case that the government is in violation of federal law by not timely scheduling a subsequent bond redetermination hearing for Petitioner, which he has been repeatedly requesting for over a month. See Siqueira v. Moniz, 26-40227, Doc. No. 7 (D. Mass. Oct. 1, 2026) (ordering the government to provide the petitioner with a hearing under § 1003.19(e)). Given this, and in light of the record before me, the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is GRANTED. Respondents are ORDERED to provide Petitioner with a subsequent bond redetermination hearing before an Immigration Judge pursuant to 8 C.F.R. § 1003.19(e), in which the Immigration Judge shall consider whether there are materially changed circumstances and, if so, whether release on bond is warranted, by October 9, 2026. Respondents are further ORDERED to file a status report within 24 hours of the Immigration Judge’s decision on bond, stating whether Petitioner has been granted bond, and, if his request for bond was denied, the reasons for that denial, or whether he has been released, and if so, the date, time, and location of his release. The Respondents should include a copy of the Immigration Judge’s decision with their status report.(SP) (Entered: 10/02/2026)

Oct 02, 2026

Order

#11

Oct 15, 2026

Status Report

#12

Oct 30, 2026

Judgment