District of Massachusetts • 1:26-cv-14300

#1

Sep 21, 2026

PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2241) Filing fee: $ 5, receipt number AMADC-12049858 Fee status: Filing Fee paid., filed by Geovani A Gutierrez. (Attachments: # 1 Category Form, # 2 Civil Cover Form)(Estrada, Carlos) (Entered: 09/21/2026)

#2

Sep 21, 2026

ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. District Judge Leo T. Sorokin assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge Paul G. Levenson. (SP) (Entered: 09/21/2026)

#3

Sep 21, 2026

General Order 19-02, dated June 1, 2019 regarding Public Access to Immigration Cases Restricted by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2(c). (FGD) (Entered: 09/21/2026)

#4

Sep 21, 2026

District Judge Leo T. Sorokin: ORDER entered. ORDER CONCERNING SERVICE OF PETITION AND STAY OF TRANSFER OR REMOVAL. (FGD) (Entered: 09/21/2026)

#5

Sep 21, 2026

Copy re 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2241), 4 Service Order - 2241 Petition emailed to Duty AUSA and mailed to Respondents and USAO on 9/21/2026. (FGD) (Entered: 09/21/2026)

Sep 21, 2026

Notice of Case Assignment

Sep 21, 2026

Copy Mailed

#6

Sep 24, 2026

NOTICE of Appearance by Vincent Engingro, III on behalf of Antone Moniz, Markwayne Mullin, David Wesling (Engingro, Vincent) (Entered: 09/24/2026)

#7

Sep 24, 2026

Entry filed in error. (Entered: 09/24/2026)

#8

Sep 24, 2026

RESPONSE/ANSWER to Petitioner's 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2241) by Antone Moniz, Markwayne Mullin, David Wesling. (Engingro, Vincent) (Entered: 09/24/2026)

#9

Sep 24, 2026

District Judge Leo T. Sorokin: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered. The Court has reviewed the petition, filed by Geovani Gutierrez, as well as the response, in which Respondents acknowledge that “the legal issues presented in this Petition are similar to those recently addressed by this Court in Arevalo v. Moniz”—a case in which Respondents acknowledged the petitioner was eligible for a bond hearing conducted pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1226(a) under the binding decision in Guerrero Orellana v. Moniz, No. 25-2152, 2026 WL 2352042 (1st Cir. Aug. 13, 2026). Doc. Nos. 1, 8; see alsoArevalo v. Moniz, No. 26-cv-13733-LTS (D. Mass. Sep. 8, 2026), Dkt. No. 15. In light of the foregoing, the Court construes—and ORDERS the respondents to likewise construe—the pending petition as conveying a request for a bond hearing before an immigration judge. The Court further ORDERS that such a hearing shall be scheduled (if it has not already been scheduled) to occur by October 1, 2026; that the legal standard governing such hearing is as established by the First Circuit in Hernandez-Lara v. Lyons; that, in determining whether the government has met its burden of proof as to risk of flight or danger, the immigration judge shall consider whether any condition, combination of conditions, or less-restrictive alternative to detention would ameliorate such risk; and that the respondents shall not retaliate against Petitioner for the filing of this action. The parties shall file a joint status report by October 6, 2026, notifying the Court of whether a bond hearing has occurred and, if so, its outcome. The merits of the habeas petition remain under advisement pending receipt and review of that status report.(FGD) (Entered: 09/24/2026)

Sep 24, 2026

Stay

Sep 24, 2026

Order AND ~Util - Set Deadlines