District of Massachusetts • 1:26-cv-14290

#1

Sep 20, 2026

PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2241) Filing fee: $ 5, receipt number AMADC-12047461 Fee status: Filing Fee paid., filed by Nathalie Dulcie Da Veiga. (Attachments: # 1 Category Form, # 2 Civil Cover Sheet, # 3 Exhibit Letters from Cape Verde and Senegal)(Andrade, Joceline) Modified on 9/21/2026 Removing duplicate text (NMC). (Entered: 09/20/2026)

#2

Sep 20, 2026

Judge Allison D. Burroughs: ORDER entered; EMERGENCY ORDER CONCERNING STAY OF TRANSFER OR REMOVAL. (JEG) (Entered: 09/20/2026)

#3

Sep 21, 2026

ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. District Judge Angel Kelley assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge Donald L. Cabell. (SP) (Entered: 09/21/2026)

#4

Sep 21, 2026

District Judge Angel Kelley: ORDER entered. Order Concerning Service of Petition, Stay of Transfer or Removal, and Required Response. (CEH) (Entered: 09/21/2026)

#5

Sep 21, 2026

General Order 19-02, dated June 1, 2019 regarding Public Access to Immigration Cases Restricted by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2(c). (CEH) (Entered: 09/21/2026)

#6

Sep 21, 2026

Copy re 4 Service Order - 2241 Petition, 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2241), emailed to AUSA Alexandra Brazier, Rayford Farquhar, and USAMA Civil Process on 9/21/2026 at 9:42 am and mailed to all respondents (CEH) (Entered: 09/21/2026)

#7

Sep 21, 2026

District Judge Angel Kelley: ORDER entered. Standing Order Regarding Motion Practice. (CEH) (Entered: 09/21/2026)

Sep 21, 2026

Notice of Case Assignment

Sep 21, 2026

Copy Mailed

#8

Sep 24, 2026

MOTION Deem Petition unopposed and grant the relief requested by Nathalie Dulcie Da Veiga.(Andrade, Joceline) (Entered: 09/24/2026)

#9

Sep 24, 2026

NOTICE of Appearance by Vincent Engingro, III on behalf of Todd Blanche, Markwayne Mullin, David Venturella, David Wesling (Engingro, Vincent) (Entered: 09/24/2026)

#10

Sep 24, 2026

MOTION for Extension of Time to October 2, 2026 to File Response/Reply as to 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2241), by Todd Blanche, Markwayne Mullin, David Venturella, David Wesling.(Engingro, Vincent) (Entered: 09/24/2026)

#11

Sep 25, 2026

District Judge Angel Kelley: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered GRANTING 10 Motion for Extension of Time to October 2, 2026 to File Response/Reply. Accordingly, Petitioner's 8 Emergency Motion to Deem the Petition Unopposed and Grant the Requested Relief is DENIED AS MOOT. (CEH) (Entered: 09/25/2026)

Sep 25, 2026

Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply AND Order on Motion for Miscellaneous Relief

#12

Oct 03, 2026

Emergency MOTION Deem Petition Unopposed and Grant the Requested Relief by Nathalie Dulcie Da Veiga.(Andrade, Joceline) (Entered: 10/03/2026)

#13

Oct 03, 2026

RESPONSE/ANSWER to by Todd Blanche, Markwayne Mullin, David Venturella, David Wesling. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4)(Engingro, Vincent) (Entered: 10/03/2026)

#14

Oct 05, 2026

Reply to Govenment's Response by Nathalie Dulcie Da Veiga . (Andrade, Joceline) (Entered: 10/05/2026)

#15

Oct 07, 2026

NOTICE by Todd Blanche, Markwayne Mullin, David Venturella, David Wesling re 4 Service Order - 2241 Petition of Intent to Remove Petitioner (Engingro, Vincent) (Entered: 10/07/2026)

#16

Oct 08, 2026

District Judge Angel Kelley: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered. The Court acknowledges the Respondents' Notice of Intent to Remove Petitioner. [Dkt. 15]. As stated in the Notice, Petitioner shall "not be removed until further Order of this Court" as the Court reviews the Petition. To give the Court an opportunity to consider whether it has subject-matter jurisdiction, and if so to determine the validity of the habeas petition, the Court may order Respondents to preserve the status quo. See United States v. United Mine Workers of Am., 330 U.S. 258, 293 (1947) (ruling that the District Court ha[s] the power to preserve existing conditions while it [is] determining its own authority to grant injunctive relief, unless the assertion of jurisdiction is frivolous). Such an order is valid unless and until it is overturned, even when the issuing court lacks subject-matter jurisdiction to determine the merits of the underlying action. See id. at 294-95. That principle applies with even greater force where the action the court enjoins would otherwise destroy its jurisdiction or moot the case. See United States v. Shipp, 203 U.S. 563, 573 (1906).Accordingly, the Court ORDERS the stay on Petitioner's transfer and removal pursuant to the Service Order [Dkt. 4] remains in effect until the Court decides the Petition [Dkt. 1].(CEH) (Entered: 10/08/2026)

Oct 08, 2026

Order

#17

Oct 19, 2026

STATUS REPORT by Nathalie Dulcie Da Veiga. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Updated Order of Supervision)(Andrade, Joceline) (Entered: 10/19/2026)

#18

Oct 19, 2026

District Judge Angel Kelley: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered. According to Petitioner's Status Report [Dkt. 17], she was released "from physical confinement on October 13, 2026." Petitioner's release "was conditioned on wearing a GPS ankle monitor, which she remains required to wear." Petitioner argues that "her conditional release does not moot this action," and "requests that the Court retain jurisdiction over the pending Petition." To address this issue, the Court sets the following briefing schedule:Respondents' response due by October 26, 2026Petitioner's reply due by November 2, 2026(CEH) (Entered: 10/19/2026)

Oct 19, 2026

Order

#19

Oct 26, 2026

Dismiss