Eastern District of California • 1:26-cv-07288

#1

Sep 10, 2026

PETITION for WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS against Warden, Central Valley Annex Ice Detention Facility by Exanel Pierre-Vil. (Deputy Clerk DAR) (Entered: 09/11/2026)

#2

Sep 10, 2026

MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Exanel Pierre-Vil. (Deputy Clerk DAR) (Entered: 09/11/2026)

#3

Sep 10, 2026

MOTION for TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER by Exanel Pierre-Vil. (Deputy Clerk DAR) (Entered: 09/11/2026)

#4

Sep 10, 2026

MOTION to APPOINT COUNSEL by Exanel Pierre-Vil. (Deputy Clerk DAR) (Entered: 09/11/2026)

#5

Sep 11, 2026

IMMIGRATION NEW CASE DOCUMENTS (Attachments: # 1 Litigant Letter) (Deputy Clerk DAR) (Entered: 09/11/2026)

#6

Sep 11, 2026

DESIGNATION of COUNSEL FOR SERVICE. Added attorney Gabriel Andres Soto-Perez for Warden, Central Valley Annex Ice Detention Facility (Soto-Perez, Gabriel) (Entered: 09/11/2026)

#7

Sep 11, 2026

MINUTE ORDER issued by the Courtroom Deputy for District Judge Dena M. Coggins on 9/11/2026: The court has reviewed Petitioner's 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and 3 Motion for Temporary Restraining Order. Noncitizens present without admission who are apprehended in the interior of the United States are subject to discretionary detention under 8 U.S.C. § 1226, not mandatory detention under § 1225(b)(2)(A). See Rodriguez Vazquez v. Bostock, 183 F.4th 1160, 1165 (9th Cir. July 30, 2026). Further, this court has previously addressed the legal issues raised by Count One of the Petition. See e.g., Selis Tinoco v. Noem, 818 F. Supp. 3d 1141 (E.D. Cal. Dec. 14, 2025); Labrador-Prato v. Noem, 815 F. Supp. 3d 1113 (E.D. Cal. Dec. 2, 2025); D.L.C. v. Wofford, 1:25-cv-01996-DC-JDP, 2026 WL 25511 (E.D. Cal. Jan. 5, 2026). The court is contemplating ruling directly on the 1 Petition, with the understanding that the court will also consider any arguments made and exhibits submitted in support of the Motion for Temporary Restraining Order. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 65(a)(2) ("Before or after beginning the hearing on a motion for a preliminary injunction, the court may advance the trial on the merits and consolidate it with the hearing."); see also 28 U.S.C. § 2243 ("The court shall summarily hear and determine the facts, and dispose of [a petitioner's habeas petition] as law and justice require."); A.R. v. Chestnut, No. 1:26-cv-00551-KES-SAB, 2026 WL 227112, at *1 (E.D. Cal. Jan. 28, 2026) (considering preliminary injunction and merits of habeas petition simultaneously). Respondents shall file an Opposition or Statement of Non-Opposition to the 3 Motion for Temporary Restraining Order by 12:00 PM on 9/15/2026. In their response, Respondents shall substantively address whether there are any factual or legal issues in this case that materially distinguish it from Rodriguez Vazquez, Tinoco, Labrador-Prato, and D.L.C. Petitioner may file a Reply by 9/29/2026. Both parties should address whether they oppose the court ruling directly on the Petition, albeit as to Count One only, to the extent a ruling on that Count entitles Petitioner to the relief sought in the Petition. The matter is not set for a hearing though the court may set one should it later be determined that a hearing is necessary. (Text Only Entry) (Deputy Clerk CRS) (Entered: 09/11/2026)

Sep 11, 2026

SERVICE BY MAIL: Minute Order, filed at Doc. No. 7, served on Exanel Pierre-Vil. (Text Only Entry) (Deputy Clerk CRS)

Sep 11, 2026

SERVICE BY MAIL: 5 Immigration New Case Documents served on Exanel Pierre-Vil. (Deputy Clerk DAR)

Sep 11, 2026

Minute Order AND ~Util - Set Motion and F&R Deadlines/Hearings

Sep 11, 2026

Service by Mail

#8

Sep 13, 2026

RESPONSE by Warden, Central Valley Annex Ice Detention Facility to 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, 7 Minute Order,,,,,,,,,, Set Motion and F&R Deadlines/Hearings,,,,,,,,,. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit, # 2 Exhibit, # 3 Exhibit)(Soto-Perez, Gabriel) (Entered: 09/13/2026)

#9

Sep 18, 2026

Order AND Order on Motion for TRO AND Order on Motion to Appoint Counsel AND Order on Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis AND ~Util - Terminate Civil Case

#10

Sep 18, 2026

Judgment

Sep 18, 2026

Service by Mail