Eastern District of California • 1:26-cv-07092

#1

Sep 03, 2026

PETITION for WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS against Sergio Albarran, Todd Blanche, Markwayne Mullin, David J. Venturella, WARDEN by JOSE MARIA LORENZO MARCOS JAUREGUI. (Filing fee $ 5, receipt number ACAEDC-13827902) (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet)(Powers, Madeleine) (Entered: 09/03/2026)

#2

Sep 03, 2026

MOTION for TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER by JOSE MARIA LORENZO MARCOS JAUREGUI. (Attachments: # 1 Notice TRO Checklist, # 2 Proposed Order Proposed TRO, # 3 Declaration Declaration of Counsel, # 4 Exhibit Declaration of Jose Maria Lorenzo Marcos Jauregui, # 5 Exhibit Declaration of Daiyerin Mujica Mendoza, # 6 Exhibit Declaration of Jorge Mario Auques Huaman, # 7 Exhibit Petitioner's I-589, # 8 Exhibit Notice to Appear, # 9 Exhibit Order of Release on Recognizance, # 10 Exhibit DHS Call-In Letter, # 11 Exhibit ICE Detainee Locator, # 12 Exhibit Letter from Primary Care Provider, # 13 Exhibit IEP, # 14 Exhibit Letter from Pastor Fernando Vazquez)(Powers, Madeleine) (Entered: 09/03/2026)

#3

Sep 04, 2026

IMMIGRATION NEW CASE DOCUMENTS. (Deputy Clerk MR) (Entered: 09/04/2026)

#4

Sep 04, 2026

DESIGNATION of COUNSEL FOR SERVICE. Added attorney Jonathan Williams, GOVT for Sergio Albarran,Jonathan Williams, GOVT for Todd Blanche,Jonathan Williams, GOVT for Markwayne Mullin,Jonathan Williams, GOVT for David J. Venturella,Jonathan Williams, GOVT for Warden (Williams, Jonathan) (Entered: 09/04/2026)

#5

Sep 04, 2026

EO: The court has received and reviewed Petitioner'spetition for writ of habeas corpus, Dkt. No. 1, and motion for temporary restraining order, Dkt. No. 2 . Pending the court's decision on the petition, and unless and until the court orders otherwise, the court ORDERS that Respondents shall not transfer Petitioner out of this District. See F.T.C. v. Dean Foods Co., 384 U.S. 597, 604 (1966) (noting court's "express authority under the All Writs Act to issue such temporary injunctions as may be necessary to protect its own jurisdiction").Petitioner appears to have been previously released on his own recognizance, meaning that the government previously implicitly found he was neither a flight risk nor a danger to the community. And he was given no pre-deprivation process before his most-recent immigration arrest and detention. Accordingly, the issues raised in the petition appear to mirror those previously addressed by this court and others in many prior cases. See, e.g., Kallebe C.F.L v. Warden, Cal. City Corr. Ctr., No. 1:26-cv-03651-MWJS, 2026 WL 1374754 (E.D. Cal. May 14, 2026); A.J.S.M.P. v. Mullin, No. 1:26-cv-03163-MWJS, 2026 WL 1190220 (E.D. Cal. Apr. 29, 2026); Garcia Mariagua v. Chestnut, No. 1:25-cv-01744-DJC-CSK, 2025 WL 3551700 (E.D. Cal. Dec. 11, 2025). Given the substantial percolation of these issues, the court intends to rule directly on the petition. See28 U.S.C. § 2243 ("The court shall summarily hear and determine the facts, and dispose of [a petitioner's habeas petition] as law and justice require."). On or before September 9, 2026, Respondents are ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE as to whether there are any factual or legal issues in this case that render it distinguishable from prior cases such as the ones listed above and justify denying the petition, or indicate this matter is not substantively distinguishable. Petitioner may file a reply on or before September 11, 2026. This matter is not set for a hearing though the court may set one should it later be determined that a hearing is necessary.IT IS SO ORDERED.(JUDGE MICAH W.J. SMITH) (ab) (Entered: 09/04/2026)

Sep 04, 2026

Minute Order

#7

Sep 11, 2026

Reply to Response to Motion

#8

Sep 16, 2026

Order AND ~Util - Terminate Civil Case

#9

Sep 16, 2026

Judgment