Eastern District of California • 1:26-cv-07039
(HC) Rodriguez v. Warden of California City Detention Facility
Completed
Case Information
Filed: September 02, 2026
Assigned to:
Kirk E. Sherriff
Referred to:
Stanley A. Boone
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee
Cause:
8:1105(a) Aliens: Habeas Corpus to Release INS Detainee
Completed: September 10, 2026
Last Activity:
September 10, 2026
Parties:
View All Parties →
Docket Entries
#1
Sep 02, 2026
2241 PETITION for WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS against Warden of California City Detention Facility by Pichardo Edward Rodriguez. (Deputy Clerk SZ) (Entered: 09/03/2026)
Main Document:
Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
#2
Sep 02, 2026
MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Pichardo Edward Rodriguez. (Deputy Clerk SZ) (Entered: 09/03/2026)
Main Document:
In Forma Pauperis
#3
Sep 02, 2026
MOTION to APPOINT COUNSEL by Pichardo Edward Rodriguez. (Deputy Clerk SZ) (Entered: 09/03/2026)
Main Document:
Appoint Counsel
#4
Sep 02, 2026
MOTION for TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER by Pichardo Edward Rodriguez. (Deputy Clerk SZ) (Entered: 09/03/2026)
Main Document:
Temporary Restraining Order
#5
Sep 03, 2026
ORDER AUTHORIZING IN FORMA PAUPERIS STATUS as to Pichardo Edward Rodriguez signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 09/03/2026. (Deputy Clerk SZ) (Entered: 09/03/2026)
Main Document:
05 - HC/Order Authorizing IFP AND Order on Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis
#6
Sep 03, 2026
IMMIGRATION NEW CASE DOCUMENTS. (Attachments: # 1 Consent Form) (Deputy Clerk SZ) (Entered: 09/03/2026)
Main Document:
Immigration New Case Documents
#7
Sep 03, 2026
DESIGNATION of COUNSEL FOR SERVICE. Added attorney Carmen Idalia Paniagua for Warden of California City Detention Facility (Paniagua, Carmen) (Entered: 09/03/2026)
Main Document:
DESIGNATION
Sep 03, 2026
SERVICE BY MAIL: 6 Immigration New Case Documents, 5 Order Authorizing IFP Status, Order on Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis served on Pichardo Edward Rodriguez. (Deputy Clerk SZ)
Sep 03, 2026
Service by Mail
#8
Sep 04, 2026
MINUTE ORDER signed by District Judge Kirk E. Sherriff on 9/04/2026: (Text Only Entry). The Court has reviewed the 1 petition for writ of habeas corpus and 4 motion for temporary restraining order. The Court has previously addressed the legal issues raised by claim one of the 1 petition. See e.g., Luis Alberto R.C. v. Murray, 817 F. Supp. 3d 917 (E.D. Cal. 2025); Elmer Joel M. C. v. Wofford, No. 1:25-CV-01622-KES-CDB (HC), 2025 WL 3501200 (E.D. Cal. Dec. 6, 2025); W.V.S.M. v. Wofford, No. 1:25-CV-01489-KES-HBK (HC), 2025 WL 3236521 (E.D. Cal. Nov. 19, 2025); Bilal A. v. Wofford, No. 1:25-CV-01715-KES-HBK (HC), 2025 WL 3648366 (E.D. Cal. Dec. 16, 2025); Marina V.N. v. Robbins, No. 1:25-CV-01845-KES-SKO (HC), 2025 WL 3701960 (E.D. Cal. Dec. 21, 2025). The Court intends to rule directly on the 1 petition for writ of habeas corpus, with the understanding that the Court will also consider any arguments made and exhibits submitted in support of the 4 motion for temporary restraining order. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 65(a)(2) ("Before or after beginning the hearing on a motion for a preliminary injunction, the court may advance the trial on the merits and consolidate it with the hearing."); see also 28 U.S.C. § 2243 ("The court shall summarily hear and determine the facts, and dispose of [a petitioner's habeas petition] as law and justice require."); Dzhabrailov v. Decker, No. 20-CV-3118 (PMH), 2020 WL 2731966, at *4 (S.D.N.Y. May 26, 2020) (considering preliminary injunction and merits of habeas petition simultaneously). On or before September 9, 2026, respondents are ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE as to whether there are any factual or legal issues in this case that distinguish it from the Court's prior orders in Luis Alberto R.C. v. Murray, Elmer Joel M. C. v. Wofford, W.V.S.M. v. Wofford, Bilal A. v. Wofford, and Marina V.N. v. Robbins and justify denying the petition, or indicate the matter is not substantively distinguishable. Pending the Court's decision, and unless and until the Court orders otherwise, the Court ORDERS that respondents shall not transfer petitioner out of this District. See F.T.C. v. Dean Foods Co., 384 U.S. 597, 604 (1966) (noting court's "express authority under the All Writs Act to issue such temporary injunctions as may be necessary to protect its own jurisdiction"). (Deputy Clerk VMG) (Entered: 09/04/2026)
Sep 04, 2026
Service by Mail
Sep 04, 2026
SERVICE BY MAIL: 8 Minute Order, served on Pichardo Edward Rodriguez. (Deputy Clerk VMG)
Sep 04, 2026
Minute Order
#9
Sep 09, 2026
OPPOSITION by Respondent Warden of California City Detention Facility to 4 MOTION for TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER, 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, 8 Minute Order,,,,,,,,,. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1 (I-213), # 2 Exhibit 2 (NTA), # 3 Exhibit 3 (I-200), # 4 Exhibit 4 (OREC), # 5 Exhibit 5 (RAP))(Paniagua, Carmen) (Entered: 09/09/2026)
Main Document:
OPPOSITION
#10
Sep 10, 2026
ORDER GRANTING Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and Requiring Bond Hearing Within Ten (10) Days signed by District Judge Kirk E. Sherriff on 9/10/2026. CASE CLOSED. (Deputy Clerk AML) (Entered: 09/10/2026)
Main Document:
Order Dismissing Case
#11
Sep 10, 2026
JUDGMENT dated *9/10/2026* pursuant to order 10 . (Deputy Clerk AML) (Entered: 09/10/2026)
Main Document:
Judgment
Sep 10, 2026
Service by Mail
Sep 10, 2026
SERVICE BY MAIL: 11 Judgment, 10 Order Dismissing Case served on Pichardo Edward Rodriguez. (Deputy Clerk AML)
Parties
(HC) Rodriguez
Party
Warden of California City Detention Facility
Party