Central District of California • 5:26-cv-04993
Vache Amaryan v. David J Venturella
Active
Case Information
Filed: August 31, 2026
Assigned to:
Percy Anderson
Referred to:
Pedro V. Castillo
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee
Cause:
28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Active
Last Activity:
September 08, 2026
Parties:
View All Parties →
Docket Entries
#1
Aug 31, 2026
PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in Federal Custody (28 USC 2241), Receipt No. ACACDC-43187054 for $5 filing fee, filed by petitioner Vache Amaryan. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 5) (Attorney Mary Kostanyan added to party Vache Amaryan(pty:pet))(Kostanyan, Mary) (Entered: 08/31/2026)
Main Document:
Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Attorney Civil Case Opening)
#2
Aug 31, 2026
EX PARTE APPLICATION for Temporary Restraining Order as to Release of Alien Detainee filed by petitioner Vache Amaryan. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of Mary Kostanyan, # 2 Proposed Order TRO) (Kostanyan, Mary) (Entered: 08/31/2026)
Main Document:
Temporary Restraining Order
#3
Aug 31, 2026
CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Petitioner Vache Amaryan. (Kostanyan, Mary) (Entered: 08/31/2026)
Main Document:
Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71)
#4
Aug 31, 2026
NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Petitioner Vache Amaryan, identifying Vache Amaryan. (Kostanyan, Mary) (Entered: 08/31/2026)
Main Document:
Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties
#5
Aug 31, 2026
NOTICE OF REFERENCE to a U.S. Magistrate Judge. This case has been assigned to the calendar of the Honorable District Judge Percy Anderson and referred to Magistrate Judge Pedro V. Castillo, who is authorized to consider preliminary matters and conduct all further hearings as may be appropriate or necessary. Pursuant to Local Rule 83-2.4, the Court must be notified within five (5) days of any address change. See notice for additional details. (sh) (Entered: 08/31/2026)
Main Document:
Notice of Reference to US Magistrate Judge (CV-84) (Habeas) - optional html form
#6
Aug 31, 2026
Notice of General Order 26-05 and Briefing Schedule. (sh) (Entered: 08/31/2026)
Main Document:
Notice (Scheduling Order 2241) - optional html form
#7
Aug 31, 2026
The Petitioner acknowledges the availability of a Magistrate Judge but declines to consent to have a Magistrate Judge conduct all further proceedings in this case, including trial and entry of judgment. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (sh) TEXT ONLY ENTRY (Entered: 08/31/2026)
#8
Aug 31, 2026
MINUTES IN CHAMBERS-COURT ORDER by Judge Percy Anderson. In light of Petitioner's failure to comply with Rule 7-19's notice requirements, the Court concludes that Petitioner has not shown that he should be allowed to go to the head of the line in front of all other litigants and receive special treatment, Mission Power Eng'g, 883 F. Supp. at 492, and thus fails to establish his entitlement to issuance of a temporary restraining order. Accordingly, the Court denies Petitioner's TRO Application without prejudice. (See document for further details).; denying 2 EX PARTE APPLICATION for Temporary Restraining Order as to Release of Alien Detainee. (aco) (Entered: 09/01/2026)
Aug 31, 2026
2241 Initial Case Assignment Consent or Declination
#9
Sep 01, 2026
Renewed EX PARTE APPLICATION for Temporary Restraining Order as to Release of Petitioner from Detention filed by petitioner Vache Amaryan. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of Mary Kostanyan, # 2 Exhibit 6, # 3 Exhibit 7, # 4 Proposed Order TRO) (Kostanyan, Mary) (Entered: 09/01/2026)
Main Document:
Temporary Restraining Order
#10
Sep 03, 2026
TEXT ONLY ORDER. Pursuant to the Court's Procedures and Schedules, any Opposition to an Ex Parte Application "must be filed not later than 24 hours after service." Because petitioner filed the Renewed Ex Parte Application for Temporary Restraining Order (Docket No. 9) at 10:50 p.m. on September 1, 2026, and government counsel was served with the Ex Parte Application at that time through CM/ECF, the Court sets a deadline for respondents to file an Opposition to the Ex Parte Application of 3:00 p.m. on Thursday, September 3, 2026. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (kss) TEXT ONLY ENTRY (Entered: 09/03/2026)
#11
Sep 03, 2026
Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Patrick James Kearney counsel for Respondents Todd Blanche, Marcos Charles, Doe 1, Warden of ICE Desert View Facility, Markwayne Mullin, David J Venturella. Adding PATRICK J. KEARNEY as counsel of record for RESPONDENTS for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by RESPONDENTS PATRICK J. KEARNEY. (Attorney Patrick James Kearney added to party Todd Blanche(pty:res), Attorney Patrick James Kearney added to party Marcos Charles(pty:res), Attorney Patrick James Kearney added to party Doe 1, Warden of ICE Desert View Facility(pty:res), Attorney Patrick James Kearney added to party Markwayne Mullin(pty:res), Attorney Patrick James Kearney added to party David J Venturella(pty:res))(Kearney, Patrick) (Entered: 09/03/2026)
Main Document:
Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel (G-123)
#12
Sep 03, 2026
RESPONSE filed by Respondents Todd Blanche, Marcos Charles, Doe 1, Warden of ICE Desert View Facility, Markwayne Mullin, David J Venturellato Renewed EX PARTE APPLICATION for Temporary Restraining Order as to Release of Petitioner from Detention 9, PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in Federal Custody (28 USC 2241), Receipt No. ACACDC-43187054 for $5 filing fee 1 (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Ex A I-213, # 2 Exhibit Ex B Warrant, # 3 Exhibit Ex C NTA)(Kearney, Patrick) (Entered: 09/03/2026)
Main Document:
Response
#13
Sep 03, 2026
MINUTES IN CHAMBERS-COURT ORDER by Judge Percy Anderson. Here, Petitioner does not allege the type of imminent, irreparable harm contemplated by the General Order. Moreover, in light of the expedited briefing schedule on the underlying Petition, any delay that may result from awarding Petitioner relief based on the habeas petition alone would be brief. Moreover, Petitioner has not met his burden to show a likelihood of success on the merits or that the balance of equities tip sharply in his favor. Indeed, as Respondents themselves concede, Rodriguez Vazquez appears to entitle Petitioner to a bond hearing and Petitioner has made no showing that the Immigration Court will not conduct a bond hearing consistent with Rodriguez Vazquez. As a result, the Court concludes that Petitioner is not entitled to emergency, ex parte relief. The Court therefore denies the TRO Application. Proceedings on the merits of the Petition continue to be referred to the assigned Magistrate Judge. (See document for further details).; denying 9 Renewed EX PARTE APPLICATION for Temporary Restraining Order. (aco) (Entered: 09/03/2026)
Sep 03, 2026
Generic Text Only Entry
#14
Sep 08, 2026
Reply (Motion related)
Main Document:
Reply (Motion related)
Parties
David J Venturella
Party
Vache Amaryan
Party