Eastern District of California • 1:26-cv-06394

#1

Aug 11, 2026

PETITION for WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS against Warden, Golden State Annex Detention Facility by Bounmy Vue. (Deputy Clerk DAR) (Entered: 08/12/2026)

#2

Aug 11, 2026

MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Bounmy Vue. (Deputy Clerk DAR) (Entered: 08/12/2026)

#3

Aug 11, 2026

MOTION to APPOINT COUNSEL by Bounmy Vue. (Deputy Clerk DAR) (Entered: 08/12/2026)

#4

Aug 12, 2026

IMMIGRATION NEW CASE DOCUMENTS (Attachments: # 1 Litigant Letter) (Deputy Clerk DAR) (Entered: 08/12/2026)

#5

Aug 12, 2026

DESIGNATION of COUNSEL FOR SERVICE. Added attorney Anthony Andrews for Warden, Golden State Annex Detention Facility (Andrews, Anthony) (Entered: 08/12/2026)

Aug 12, 2026

SERVICE BY MAIL: 4 Immigration New Case Documents served on Bounmy Vue. (Deputy Clerk DAR)

Aug 12, 2026

Service by Mail

#6

Aug 13, 2026

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Chi Soo Kim on 08/13/26 GRANTING 2 Motion to Proceed IFP; ORDERING that, within 7 days, Respondents are to file an Answer or Motion to Dismiss; Petitioner's reply/traverse to an answer or opposition to a motion, if any, is due within 10 days after being served with respondents' filing; respondents' reply due 7 days after being served with the opposition. Each party proceeding without counsel shall keep the court informed of the current address at all times, with any change of address reported by filing a "Notice of Change of Address" and served on other parties. (Deputy Clerk AJB) (Entered: 08/13/2026)

Aug 13, 2026

Service by Mail

Aug 13, 2026

SERVICE BY MAIL: 6 Order served on Bounmy Vue. (Deputy Clerk AJB)

#7

Aug 20, 2026

ANSWER to PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS by Warden, Golden State Annex Detention Facility. (Andrews, Anthony) (Entered: 08/20/2026)

#8

Sep 08, 2026

TRAVERSE by Bounmy Vue. (Deputy Clerk VLK) (Entered: 09/10/2026)

#9

Sep 23, 2026

MOTION for TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER by Bounmy Vue. (Deputy Clerk DAR) (Entered: 09/25/2026)

#10

Sep 25, 2026

MINUTE ORDER issued by the Courtroom Deputy for District Judge Dena M. Coggins on 9/25/2026: The court has reviewed Petitioner's 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and 9 Motion for Temporary Restraining Order. The court has previously addressed the legal issues raised by the Petition. See, e.g., Hoac v. Becerra, No. 2:25-cv-01740-DC-JDP, 2025 WL 1993771 (E.D. Cal. July 16, 2025), Vuong v. Becerra, 1:25-cv-01847-DC-CSK, 2025 WL 3707172 (E.D. Cal. Dec. 22, 2025), and El-Ghazaly v. Chestnut, 1:25-cv-01621-DC-CKD, 2025 WL 3485030 (E.D. Cal. Dec. 4, 2025). The court is contemplating ruling directly on the 1 Petition, with the understanding that the court will also consider any arguments made and exhibits submitted in support of the Motion for Temporary Restraining Order. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 65(a)(2) ("Before or after beginning the hearing on a motion for a preliminary injunction, the court may advance the trial on the merits and consolidate it with the hearing."); see also 28 U.S.C. § 2243 ("The court shall summarily hear and determine the facts, and dispose of [a petitioner's habeas petition] as law and justice require."); A.R. v. Chestnut, No. 1:26-cv-00551-KES-SAB, 2026 WL 227112, at *1 (E.D. Cal. Jan. 28, 2026) (considering preliminary injunction and merits of habeas petition simultaneously). Respondents shall file an Opposition or Statement of Non-Opposition to the 9 Motion for Temporary Restraining Order by 12:00 PM on 9/29/2026. In their response, Respondents shall substantively address whether there are any factual or legal issues in this case that materially distinguish it from the court's prior orders listed above. Petitioner may file a Reply by 10/13/2026. Both parties should address whether they oppose the court ruling directly on the Petition. The matter is not set for a hearing though the court may set one should it later be determined that a hearing is necessary. (Text Only Entry) (Deputy Clerk CRS) (Entered: 09/25/2026)

Sep 25, 2026

Minute Order AND ~Util - Set Motion and F&R Deadlines/Hearings

Sep 25, 2026

Service by Mail

Sep 25, 2026

SERVICE BY MAIL: Minute Order, filed at Doc. No. 10, served on Bounmy Vue. (Text Only Entry) (Deputy Clerk CRS)

#11

Sep 29, 2026

OPPOSITION by Warden, Golden State Annex Detention Facility to 9 Motion for Temporary Restraining Order. (Andrews, Anthony) (Entered: 09/29/2026)

#12

Oct 06, 2026

MINUTE ORDER issued by the Courtroom Deputy for District Judge Dena M. Coggins on 10/6/2026: In Respondents' 7 11 Oppositions to Petitioner's 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and 9 Motion for Temporary Restraining Order, Respondents distinguish Petitioner's claim from those cited in the court's 10 Order by emphasizing that Petitioner is subject to a final order of removal, that his release on an order of supervision was revoked due to Petitioner's multiple interactions with law enforcement, and that his removal is foreseeable because "ICE is currently working with the government of Laos to secure a travel document." Respondents contend that Petitioner's order of supervised release was properly revoked pursuant to 8 C.F.R. § 241.4(l) and attach a Notice of Revocation confirming that Petitioner's release was revoked pursuant to his criminal charges occurring subsequent to his previous release, and an Alien Informal Interview form confirming that such an interview took place upon his re-detention. Federal regulations permit the Government to revoke a noncitizen's release when the noncitizen "violates any of the conditions of release." Thus, it appears that Respondents properly revoked Petitioner's release in accordance with regulations due to his criminal convictions accrued after his previous release. Further, while this court has previously found that the Government's pursuit of a travel document does not constitute evidence sufficient to demonstrate a likelihood of removal in the foreseeable future under Zadvydas v. Davis, 533 U.S. 678 (2001), Petitioner acknowledges in his 1 Petition that he has been detained for a combined period of less than six months such that his detention pending removal remains presumptively reasonable. Accordingly, the court finds that Respondents properly revoked Petitioner's previous release on an order of supervision, and that his detention remains presumptively reasonable while Respondents pursue a travel document from Laos. See Kumar v. Wofford, No. 1:26-cv-01391-DAD-CSK, 2026 WL 710323 (E.D. Cal. Mar. 12, 2026) (denying motion for temporary restraining order where government properly revoked the petitioner's release due to criminal history and the petitioner did not show that his detention had grown unconstitutionally prolonged). Accordingly, Petitioner has not demonstrated a likelihood of success on the merits of his claim that his continued detention violates his statutory or constitutional rights and his 9 Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order is DENIED. This matter is REFERRED to the assigned Magistrate Judge for further proceedings. (Text Only Entry) (Deputy Clerk CRS) (Entered: 10/06/2026)

Oct 06, 2026

SERVICE BY MAIL: Minute Order, filed at Doc. No. 12, served on Bounmy Vue. (Text Only Entry) (Deputy Clerk CRS)

Oct 06, 2026

Service by Mail

Oct 06, 2026

Minute Order AND Order on Motion for TRO AND ~Util - 1 Terminate Deadlines and Hearings AND ~Util - Motions Referred

#13

Oct 26, 2026

ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Chi Soo Kim on 10/26/2026 DENYING Petitioner's 3 Motion to Appoint Counsel. It is RECOMMENDED that the 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus be denied and that the Clerk be directed to enter judgment for Respondents and close this case. Referred to Judge Dena M. Coggins. Objections due within 14 days after being served with these findings and recommendations. (Deputy Clerk KS)

Oct 26, 2026

Service by Mail