Eastern District of California • 1:26-cv-06202
(HC) Espinosa Valdes v. Warden, California City Immigration Center
Active
Case Information
Filed: August 05, 2026
Assigned to:
Dale Alan Drozd
Referred to:
Jeremy D. Peterson
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee
Cause:
8:1105(a) Aliens: Habeas Corpus to Release INS Detainee
Active
Last Activity:
August 07, 2026
Parties:
View All Parties →
Docket Entries
#1
Aug 06, 2026
PETITION for WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS against Warden, California City Immigration Center by Misael Espinosa Valdes. (Deputy Clerk DAR) (Entered: 08/06/2026)
Main Document:
Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
#2
Aug 06, 2026
MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Misael Espinosa Valdes. (Deputy Clerk DAR) (Entered: 08/06/2026)
Main Document:
In Forma Pauperis
#3
Aug 06, 2026
IMMIGRATION NEW CASE DOCUMENTS. (Attachments: # 1 Litigant Letter) (Deputy Clerk DAR) (Entered: 08/06/2026)
Main Document:
Immigration New Case Documents
#4
Aug 06, 2026
DESIGNATION of COUNSEL FOR SERVICE. Added attorney Jonathan Yu, GOVT for Warden, California City Immigration Center (Yu, Jonathan) (Entered: 08/06/2026)
Main Document:
DESIGNATION
#5
Aug 06, 2026
DESIGNATION of COUNSEL FOR SERVICE. Added attorney Jonathan Yu, GOVT for Warden, California City Immigration Center, attorney Jonathan Yu, GOVT terminated (Rodriguez, Elisa) (Entered: 08/06/2026)
Main Document:
DESIGNATION
Aug 06, 2026
SERVICE BY MAIL: 3 Immigration New Case Documents served on Misael Espinosa Valdes. (Deputy Clerk DAR)
Aug 06, 2026
Service by Mail
#6
Aug 07, 2026
MINUTE ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Jeremy D. Peterson on 8/7/2026: Petitioner, an immigration detainee proceeding in pro se, filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. Under Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases, the court must examine the habeas corpus petition and order a response to the petition unless it "plainly appears" that the petitioner is not entitled to relief. It does not plainly appear that petitioner is not entitled to relief. Therefore, the court orders the government to respond to the petition and sets a briefing schedule. In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Within seven days of the date of service of this order, respondent must file a response to the petition. 2. A response may be one of the following: A. An answer addressing the merits of the petition. Any argument by respondent that petitioner has procedurally defaulted a claim must be raised in the answer, which must also address the merits of petitioner's claims. B. A motion to dismiss the petition. 3. Within seven days of the date of service of this order, respondent must file any documents necessary for resolving the issues presented in the petition. 4. If respondent files an answer to the petition, petitioner may file a traverse within seven days of the date of service of respondent's answer. If no traverse is filed within seven days, the petition and answer are deemed submitted. 5. If respondent moves to dismiss, petitioner must file an opposition or statement of non-opposition within seven days of the date of service of respondent's motion. Any reply to an opposition to the motion to dismiss must be filed within seven days after the opposition is served. The motion to dismiss will be considered submitted twenty-one days after the service of the motion or when the reply is filed, whichever comes first. See Local Rule 230(l). Petitioner's motion to proceed in forma pauperis, ECF No. 2, is GRANTED. (Text only entry) (Deputy Clerk NAC) (Entered: 08/07/2026)
Aug 07, 2026
SERVICE BY MAIL: 6 Minute Order served on Misael Espinosa Valdes. (Deputy Clerk NAC)
Aug 07, 2026
Service by Mail
Aug 07, 2026
Minute Order AND Order on Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis
Parties
Party
Attorney
Attorney
Attorney
Firm
Firm