Southern District of California • 3:26-cv-04446

Chehrazi v. Mullin

Completed

Case Information

Filed: August 04, 2026
Assigned to: James E. Simmons Jr.
Referred to: Steve B. Chu
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee
Cause: 28:2241fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Completed: August 04, 2026
Last Activity: August 04, 2026
Parties: View All Parties →

Docket Entries

#1
Aug 04, 2026
Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus against Greogory J. Archambeault, Todd Blanche, Jeremy Casey, Markwayne Mullin ( Filing fee $ 5 receipt number ACASDC-21469319.), filed by Mohammad Sina Chehrazi. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet, # 2 Exhibit A, # 3 Exhibit B)The new case number is 3:26-cv-4446-JES-SBC. Judge James E. Simmons, Jr. and Magistrate Judge Steve B. Chu are assigned to the case. (Ardalan, Kaveh)(dde) (Entered: 08/04/2026)
Main Document: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
#2
Aug 04, 2026
ORDER DISMISSING PETITION [ECF No. 1 ]. Signed by District Judge James E. Simmons, Jr on 8/4/2026. (maq) (Entered: 08/04/2026)
Main Document: Order Dismissing Case
#3
Aug 04, 2026
CLERK'S JUDGMENT. IT IS SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that here, there is not yet a final order of removal, because Petitioner has appealed his removal order. See 8 CFR § 1241.1(a) (explaining that orders of removal become final after an appeal is dismissed, waived, or otherwise forfeited). The Zadvydas framework is thus not useful in determining Petitioners case. Nor does Petitioner presently have a viable claim for a subsequent bond hearing under Matthews v. Eldridge, because he was given a bond hearing on June 11, 2026, some seven weeks ago, and is currently appealing that denial. See Mercado-Arechiga v. Larose, No. 26-CV-683-JES-DEB, 2026 WL 926901, at *5-6 (S.D. Cal. Apr. 6, 2026) (explaining analysis of requests for additional bond hearings on due process grounds). Without any viable claim for relief, the Court cannot find that he states a claim in his petition as it stands. For the reasons discussed in the Order Dismissing the Petition, the Court DENIES the Petition without prejudice, which means Petitioner is not barred from filing future Petitions with further information which could support a claim. The case is hereby closed. (maq) (Entered: 08/04/2026)
Main Document: Judgment - Clerk

Parties

Chehrazi
Party
Mullin
Party