Active
Case Information
Filed: August 04, 2026
Assigned to:
Kirk E. Sherriff
Referred to:
Christopher D. Baker
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee
Cause:
28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Active
Last Activity:
August 05, 2026
Parties:
View All Parties →
Docket Entries
#1
Aug 04, 2026
PETITION for WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS against Moises Becerra, Markwayne Mullin by Arshpreet Singh. (Filing fee $ 5, receipt number ACAEDC-13681843) (Attachments: # 1 Supplement BIA Filing Receipt, # 2 Appeal Information BIA Appeal, # 3 Supplement Immigration Judge's Removal Order)(Sturman, Jonathan) (Entered: 08/04/2026)
Main Document:
Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
#2
Aug 04, 2026
CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Arshpreet Singh. (Sturman, Jonathan) (Entered: 08/04/2026)
Main Document:
CIVIL
#3
Aug 04, 2026
IMMIGRATION NEW CASE DOCUMENTS (Attachments: # 1 Order re Consent) (Deputy Clerk LJB) (Entered: 08/04/2026)
Main Document:
Immigration New Case Documents
#4
Aug 04, 2026
DESIGNATION of COUNSEL FOR SERVICE. Added attorney Elisa M. Rodriguez for Moises Becerra,Elisa M. Rodriguez for Markwayne Mullin,Elisa M. Rodriguez for U.S. Department of Homeland Security (Rodriguez, Elisa) (Entered: 08/04/2026)
Main Document:
DESIGNATION
#5
Aug 05, 2026
MINUTE ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Christopher D. Baker on 08/05/2026: The Court has reviewed Petitioner's petition for writ of habeas corpus. (Doc. 1 ). The pleadings appear to raise factual and legal issues that this Court has resolved in other cases by finding that 8 U.S.C. § 1226(a) provides the proper framework for detention by immigration authorities of noncitizens previously encountered and released and already residing in the United States when re-detained. See, e.g., Hernandez v. Warden of the Mesa Verde Annex Det. Facility, No. 1:25-cv-01676-KES-CDB (HC), 2026 WL 472656 (E.D. Cal. Feb. 19, 2026), F&R adopted on (Feb. 21, 2026). Accordingly, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2243, the Court directs Respondents to SHOW CAUSE in writing no later than 8/12/2026 as to whether there are any factual or legal issues in this case that render it distinct from the Court's prior order in the case listed above and would justify denial of the writ. Respondents' response SHALL provide the Court with copies of referenced/relevant portions of Petitioner's A-File and other supporting documents, including notices to appear, orders relating to Petitioner's release from custody, and documents related to any asserted violations of release conditions or any asserted change of circumstances warranting Petitioner's re-detention. Petitioner may file a reply no later than 8/22/2026. (Deputy Clerk CRB) (Entered: 08/05/2026)
Aug 05, 2026
Minute Order AND ~Util - 1 Set/Reset Deadlines and Hearings
Parties
Party
Party
Party
Attorney
Attorney
Attorney
Firm
Firm
Firm