District of New Jersey • 2:26-cv-09647

GARCIA MARTIN v. SOTO

Active

Case Information

Filed: July 30, 2026
Assigned to: Evelyn Padin
Referred to:
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee
Cause: 28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Active
Last Activity: August 05, 2026
Parties: View All Parties →

Docket Entries

#1
Jul 30, 2026
PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus ( Filing fee $ 5 receipt number ANJDC-17735200.), filed by OSCAR ARMANDO GARCIA MARTIN. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order, # 2 Order to Show Cause, # 3 Certificate of Service Certificate of Service, # 4 Civil Cover Sheet JS 44 Civil Cover Sheet, # 5 Exhibit Exhibit A - Detainee Locator, # 6 Exhibit Exhibit B - ACIS, # 7 Exhibit Exhibit C - Maldonado Final Judgment)(PEREZ, JOHN) (Entered: 07/30/2026)
Main Document: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
#2
Jul 30, 2026
MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order by OSCAR ARMANDO GARCIA MARTIN. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed TRO)(PEREZ, JOHN) (Entered: 07/30/2026)
Main Document: Temporary Restraining Order
#3
Jul 30, 2026
TEXT ORDER. Respondents are hereby enjoined from transferring Petitioner from New Jersey pending further Order of the Court. So Ordered by Chief Judge Renee Marie Bumb on 7/30/2026. (jml, ) (Entered: 07/30/2026)
Jul 30, 2026
Judge Evelyn Padin added. (jml, )
Jul 30, 2026
Add and Terminate Judges
Jul 30, 2026
Emergent Immigration Habeas Non-transfer Order
#4
Jul 31, 2026
TEXT ORDER: Petitioner Oscar Armando Garcia Martin filed a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 alleging he is unlawfully detained by immigration authorities under 8 U.S.C. § 1225(b), D.E. 1 ("Petition"). Along with his Petition, Petitioner also filed a motion for a temporary restraining order seeking an order enjoining his transfer or removal from outside the District of New Jersey and for his immediate release. D.E. 2 ("TRO Motion"). It is ORDERED that, if Respondents contest Petitioner's factual allegations and/or contend that Petitioner has a criminal record and/or assert this case is distinguishable from the cases in this district previously addressing § 1225, they shall file an expedited answer to the Petition within 24 hours, and Petitioner may file a reply within three days of the date of filing of Respondents' expedited answer. If Respondents do not file expedited answer, under this Court's decision in Lomeu v. Soto, No. 25-16589, 2025 WL 2981296, at *9 (D.N.J. Oct. 23, 2025), and other recent decisions in this District interpreting § 1225, including Rivera Zumba v. Bondi, No. 25-14626, 2025 WL 2753496 (D.N.J. Sept. 26, 2025) (interpreting § 1225(b)(2)), Rivas Rodriguez v. Rokosky, No. 25-17419, 2025 WL 3485628 (D.N.J. Dec. 3, 2025) (interpreting § 1225(b)(1)), accepting Petitioner's allegations as true, the Court holds Petitioner's mandatory detention under Section 1225(b) is unlawful and further violates his liberty interest protected by the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment. If Respondents do not file an expedited answer in opposition, they shall instead release Petitioner within 24 hours of this order and file a written notice of Petitioner's release within three days. If Respondents subsequently detain Petitioner under 8 U.S.C. § 1226(a), they shall comply with the regulations at 8 C.F.R. § 236.1(c)(8) and (d). The TRO Motion, D.E. 2, is DISMISSED as MOOT because the Court has enjoined Petitioner's transfer from New Jersey and ordered an expedited resolution of this matter. So Ordered by Judge Evelyn Padin on 7/31/2026. (bt) (Entered: 07/31/2026)
Jul 31, 2026
Text Order AND ~Util - Terminate Motions
#5
Aug 04, 2026
Notice of Appearance
Main Document: Notice of Appearance
#6
Aug 04, 2026
Letter
Main Document: Letter
Aug 05, 2026
Text Order

Parties

GARCIA MARTIN
Party
SOTO
Party