District of Massachusetts • 1:26-cv-13468

#1

Jul 30, 2026

PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2241), filed by Mauricio Alexis Gonzalez Donoso. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit List, # 2 Exhibit A, # 3 Exhibit B, # 4 Exhibit C, # 5 Exhibit D, # 6 Exhibit E, # 7 Exhibit G, # 8 Exhibit H) (EZG) Modified on 7/30/2026: "Exhibit F" missing from filing despite being listed on "Exhibit List" (EZG). (Entered: 07/30/2026)

#2

Jul 30, 2026

ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. Chief District Judge Denise J. Casper assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge Paul G. Levenson. (SP) (Entered: 07/30/2026)

#3

Jul 30, 2026

General Order 19-02, dated June 1, 2019 regarding Public Access to Immigration Cases Restricted by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2(c). (EZG) (Entered: 07/30/2026)

#4

Jul 30, 2026

Chief District Judge Denise J. Casper: ORDER entered. ORDER CONCERNING SERVICE OF PETITION AND STAY OF TRANSFER OR REMOVAL. (EZG) (Entered: 07/30/2026)

Jul 30, 2026

Notice of Case Assignment

#5

Jul 31, 2026

Filing fee/payment: $ 5.00, receipt number 100016169 for 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2241), (LBO) (Entered: 07/31/2026)

Jul 31, 2026

Filing Fee/Payment Received

#6

Aug 03, 2026

NOTICE of Appearance by Benjamin Tolkoff on behalf of Patricia Hyde, Antone Moniz, Markwayne Mullin (Tolkoff, Benjamin) (Entered: 08/03/2026)

#7

Aug 11, 2026

RESPONSE/ANSWER to 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2241), by Patricia Hyde, Antone Moniz, Markwayne Mullin. (Tolkoff, Benjamin) (Entered: 08/11/2026)

#8

Aug 24, 2026

AMENDED AND EXPANDED Supplement to Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and EMERGENCY MOTION for Custody Redetermination by Mauricio Alexis Gonzalez Donoso. (EZG) (Entered: 08/24/2026)

#9

Aug 25, 2026

Chief District Judge Denise J. Casper: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered re 8 MOTION filed by Mauricio Alexis Gonzalez Donoso. In light of Petitioner's supplement to the Petition, D. 8, the Court gives the government until August 31, 2026 to respond to same. The government's response shall clarify whether Petitioner has now received an individualized bond hearing, what the immigration judge's findings and rulings were (attaching a copy of same) and shall respond to Petitioner's contention about the standard of proof applied at same. (SEC) (Entered: 08/25/2026)

Aug 25, 2026

Order

#10

Sep 01, 2026

RESPONSE to Motion re 8 MOTION and Motion to Strike Improperly Filed Motion to Enforce filed by Patricia Hyde, Antone Moniz, Markwayne Mullin. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Bond Order)(Tolkoff, Benjamin) (Entered: 09/01/2026)

#11

Sep 01, 2026

NOTICE OF MANUAL FILING by Patricia Hyde, Antone Moniz, Markwayne Mullin re 10 Response to Motion Bond Hearing Audio Recording and Exhibits (Tolkoff, Benjamin) (Entered: 09/01/2026)

#12

Sep 03, 2026

Petitioner's EMERGENCY MOTION for Immediate Release and/or Summary Grant of Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus Due to Respondents' Default and Failure to Comply with Court Order by Mauricio Alexis Gonzalez Donoso. (EZG) (Entered: 09/03/2026)

#13

Sep 04, 2026

Chief District Judge Denise J. Casper: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered re 12 MOTION for Immediate Release. The Court has received the motion of Mauricio Alexis Gonzalez Donoso ("Petitioner"), filed pro se, for immediate release, D. 12. Petitioner is not entitled to relief simply because the government filed their response to Petitioner's supplemental filing one day late, D. 10 at 1; see Quinones-Torres v. United States, 240 F. App'x 876, 878 (1st Cir. 2007) (providing that appellant not entitled to default judgment "simply because the government did not file an opposition to his habeas petition"). This is particularly true where, as Respondents point out with Petitioner’s prior motion, D. 8, this motion was unnoticed and did not comply with Local Rule 7.1, a rule that applies to pro se litigants. Le v. New England Swimming, 24-11559-NMG, 2026 WL 1453485, at *1 (D. Mass. May 21, 2026) and cases cited. Accordingly, the Court denies this ground for the relief that Petitioner seeks. Conversely, the Court will not strike this filing as the government seeks to do as to Petitioner’s prior filing, D. 8, for failure to comply with the Local Rules but instead ORDERS as follows. Petitioner’s motion, D. 12, is denied to the extent that it sought his immediate release, but the Court ORDERS that the government respond to the substance of the motion, D. 12, by September 10, 2026 and that such response address the status of Petitioner’s medical care. See Peruano v. Wesling, No. 26-cv-10300-LTS, 2026 WL 1413758, at *3 (D. Mass. May 20, 2026).(SEC) (Entered: 09/04/2026)

Sep 04, 2026

Order

#14

Sep 09, 2026

Appoint Counsel AND Proceed In Forma Pauperis

#16

Sep 10, 2026

Response to Motion

#17

Sep 15, 2026

Miscellaneous Relief

#18

Sep 15, 2026

Memorandum in Support of Motion

#21

Sep 17, 2026

Order Dismissing Case

Sep 17, 2026

Order on Motion for Miscellaneous Relief

Sep 17, 2026

Order AND ~Util - Terminate Motions