Eastern District of California • 1:26-cv-05977

#1

Jul 30, 2026

2241 PETITION for WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS against Current or Acting United States Attorney General, Current or Acting Director, United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Current or Acting Field Office Director, San Francisco Field Office, United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Warden of the California City Detention Facility, Current or Acting Secretary, United States Department of Homeland Security by Jesus Alfonso Larco Gomez. (Deputy Clerk CRM) (Entered: 07/30/2026)

#2

Jul 30, 2026

IMMIGRATION NEW CASE DOCUMENTS. (Deputy Clerk CRM) (Entered: 07/30/2026)

#3

Jul 30, 2026

ORDER AUTHORIZING IN FORMA PAUPERIS STATUS as to Jesus Alfonso Larco Gomez signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 7/30/2026. (Deputy Clerk CRM) (Entered: 07/30/2026)

#4

Jul 30, 2026

DESIGNATION of COUNSEL FOR SERVICE. Added attorney Elisa M. Rodriguez for Current or Acting Director, United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement,Elisa M. Rodriguez for Current or Acting Field Office Director, San Francisco Field Office, United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement,Elisa M. Rodriguez for Current or Acting Secretary, United States Department of Homeland Security,Elisa M. Rodriguez for Current or Acting United States Attorney General,Elisa M. Rodriguez for Warden of the California City Detention Facility (Rodriguez, Elisa) (Entered: 07/30/2026)

#5

Jul 30, 2026

MOTION for TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER by Jesus Alfonso Larco Gomez. (Deputy Clerk JPX) (Entered: 07/31/2026)

#6

Jul 30, 2026

MOTION to APPOINT COUNSEL by Jesus Alfonso Larco Gomez. (Deputy Clerk JPX) (Entered: 07/31/2026)

#7

Jul 30, 2026

MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Jesus Alfonso Larco Gomez. (Deputy Clerk JPX) (Entered: 07/31/2026)

Jul 30, 2026

SERVICE BY MAIL: 2 Immigration New Case Documents, 3 Order Authorizing IFP Status served on Jesus Alfonso Larco Gomez. (Deputy Clerk CRM)

Jul 30, 2026

Service by Mail

#8

Jul 31, 2026

MINUTE ORDER signed by District Judge Kirk E. Sherriff on 7/31/2026: The Court has reviewed the 1 petition for writ of habeas corpus and 5 motion for temporary restraining order. The Court has previously addressed the legal issues raised by the 1 petition. See e.g., Luis Alberto R.C. v. Murray, 817 F. Supp. 3d 917 (E.D. Cal. 2025); Elmer Joel M. C. v. Wofford, No. 1:25-CV-01622-KES-CDB (HC), 2025 WL 3501200 (E.D. Cal. Dec. 6, 2025); W.V.S.M. v. Wofford, No. 1:25-CV-01489-KES-HBK (HC), 2025 WL 3236521 (E.D. Cal. Nov. 19, 2025); Bilal A. v. Wofford, No. 1:25-CV-01715-KES-HBK (HC), 2025 WL 3648366 (E.D. Cal. Dec. 16, 2025); Marina V.N. v. Robbins, No. 1:25-CV-01845-KES-SKO (HC), 2025 WL 3701960 (E.D. Cal. Dec. 21, 2025). The Court intends to rule directly on the 1 petition for writ of habeas corpus, with the understanding that the Court will also consider any arguments made and exhibits submitted in support of the 5 motion for temporary restraining order. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 65(a)(2) ("Before or after beginning the hearing on a motion for a preliminary injunction, the court may advance the trial on the merits and consolidate it with the hearing."); see also 28 U.S.C. § 2243 ("The court shall summarily hear and determine the facts, and dispose of [a petitioner's habeas petition] as law and justice require."); Dzhabrailov v. Decker, No. 20-CV-3118 (PMH), 2020 WL 2731966, at *4 (S.D.N.Y. May 26, 2020) (considering preliminary injunction and merits of habeas petition simultaneously). On or before August 4, 2026, respondents are ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE as to whether there are any factual or legal issues in this case that distinguish it from the Court's prior orders in Luis Alberto R.C. v. Murray, Elmer Joel M. C. v. Wofford, W.V.S.M. v. Wofford, Bilal A. v. Wofford, and Marina V.N. v. Robbins and justify denying the petition, or indicate the matter is not substantively distinguishable. Pending the Court's decision, and unless and until the Court orders otherwise, the Court ORDERS that respondents shall not transfer petitioner out of this District. See F.T.C. v. Dean Foods Co., 384 U.S. 597, 604 (1966) (noting court's "express authority under the All Writs Act to issue such temporary injunctions as may be necessary to protect its own jurisdiction"). (Entered: 07/31/2026)

Jul 31, 2026

Minute Order

#9

Aug 04, 2026

Dismiss