Completed
Case Information
Filed: July 24, 2026
Assigned to:
Dena M. Coggins
Referred to:
Allison Claire
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee
Cause:
28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Completed: July 31, 2026
Last Activity:
July 31, 2026
Parties:
View All Parties →
Docket Entries
#1
Jul 24, 2026
PETITION for WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS against Tonya Andrews, Todd Blanche, Markwayne Mullin, David Venturella by Anmol Singh. (Filing fee $ 5, receipt number ACAEDC-13636853) (Attachments: # 1 Declaration, # 2 Exhibit, # 3 Exhibit, # 4 Civil Cover Sheet)(Kaur, Gurpreet) (Entered: 07/24/2026)
Main Document:
PETITION
#2
Jul 24, 2026
MOTION for TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER by Anmol Singh. (Attachments: # 1 Notice, # 2 Proposed Order)(Kaur, Gurpreet) (Entered: 07/24/2026)
Main Document:
MOTION
#3
Jul 27, 2026
IMMIGRATION NEW CASE DOCUMENTS. (Deputy Clerk MR) (Entered: 07/27/2026)
Main Document:
Immigration New Case Documents
#4
Jul 27, 2026
DESIGNATION of COUNSEL FOR SERVICE. Added attorney Jonathan Yu, GOVT for Tonya Andrews,Jonathan Yu, GOVT for Todd Blanche,Jonathan Yu, GOVT for Markwayne Mullin,Jonathan Yu, GOVT for David J. Venturella (Yu, Jonathan) (Entered: 07/27/2026)
Main Document:
DESIGNATION
#5
Jul 27, 2026
MINUTE ORDER issued by Relief Courtroom Deputy for District Judge Dena M. Coggins on 7/27/2026: The court has reviewed Petitioner's 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and 2 Motion for Temporary Restraining Order. The court has previously addressed the legal issues raised by Count Two of the Petition. See e.g., Selis Tinoco v. Noem, 818 F. Supp. 3d 1141 (E.D. Cal. Dec. 14, 2025), Labrador-Prato v. Noem, 815 F. Supp. 3d 1113 (E.D. Cal. Dec. 2, 2025), and D.L.C. v. Wofford, 1:25-cv-01996-DC-JDP, 2026 WL 25511 (E.D. Cal. Jan. 5, 2026). The court is contemplating ruling directly on the 1 Petition, with the understanding that the court will also consider any arguments made and exhibits submitted in support of the Motion for Temporary Restraining Order. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 65(a)(2) ("Before or after beginning the hearing on a motion for a preliminary injunction, the court may advance the trial on the merits and consolidate it with the hearing."); see also 28 U.S.C. § 2243 ("The court shall summarily hear and determine the facts, and dispose of [a petitioner's habeas petition] as law and justice require."); A.R. v. Chestnut, No. 1:26-cv-00551-KES-SAB, 2026 WL 227112, at *1 (E.D. Cal. Jan. 28, 2026) (considering preliminary injunction and merits of habeas petition simultaneously). Respondents shall file an Opposition or Statement of Non-Opposition to the 2 Motion for Temporary Restraining Order by 12:00 PM on 7/29/2026. In their response, Respondents shall substantively address whether there are any factual or legal issues in this case that materially distinguish it from the court's prior orders listed above. Petitioner may file a Reply by 12:00 PM on 7/30/2026. Both parties should address whether they oppose the court ruling directly on the Petition, albeit as to Count Two only. The matter is not set for a hearing though the court may set one should it later be determined that a hearing is necessary.(Text Only Entry) (Deputy Clerk RAA) (Entered: 07/27/2026)
Jul 27, 2026
Minute Order AND ~Util - 1 Set/Reset Deadlines and Hearings
#6
Jul 29, 2026
RESPONSE (Opposition) to 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus; OPPOSITION to 2 Motion for Temporary Restraining Order by Respondents. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2)(Yu, Jonathan) Modified on 7/30/2026 (KLY). (Entered: 07/29/2026)
Main Document:
RESPONSE
#7
Jul 31, 2026
Order AND Order on Motion for TRO AND ~Util - Terminate Civil Case
Main Document:
Order AND Order on Motion for TRO AND ~Util - Terminate Civil Case
#8
Jul 31, 2026
Judgment
Main Document:
Judgment
Parties
Andrews
Party
(HC) Singh
Party