Central District of California • 5:26-cv-04125

#1

Jul 23, 2026

PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person In Federal Custody (28:2241) (Filing fee $ 5 FEE PAID.), filed by Petitioner Yerkhat Shaakhmet. (et) (Entered: 07/23/2026)

#2

Jul 23, 2026

CONSENT TO PROCEED before Magistrate Judge, in accordance with Title 28 United States Code Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P 73(b), filed by Petitioner Yerkhat Shaakhmet. (et) (Entered: 07/23/2026)

#3

Jul 23, 2026

PETITIONER'S EX PARTE MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER AND ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION filed by Petitioner Yerkhat Shaakhmet. (et) (Entered: 07/23/2026)

#4

Jul 23, 2026

PETITIONER'S MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL filed by Petitioner Yerkhat Shaakhmet. (et) (Entered: 07/23/2026)

#5

Jul 23, 2026

PROOF OF SERVICE BY HAND BY THIRD PARTY filed by Petitioner Yerkhat Shaakhmet, re Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2241) 1, NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Appointment of Counsel 4, Consent to Proceed before U S Magistrate Judge (non-AUSA) - Non-Final 2, NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Order to Show Cause re: FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION 3 served on 7/23/2026. (et) (Entered: 07/23/2026)

#6

Jul 23, 2026

NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to a U.S. Magistrate Judge. This case has been assigned to Magistrate Judge Stephanie S. Christensen. (et) (Entered: 07/23/2026)

#7

Jul 23, 2026

NOTICE OF RESOURCES FOR PRO SE LITIGANTS. (et) (Entered: 07/23/2026)

#8

Jul 23, 2026

Notice of General Order 26-05 and Briefing Schedule. (et) (Entered: 07/23/2026)

#9

Jul 23, 2026

(IN CHAMBERS) Order Denying Petitioner's Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order (ECF 3 ) by Magistrate Judge Stephanie S. Christensen. The Court denies Petitioner's motion for a TRO because the briefing schedule on Petitioner's underlying habeas petition has been expedited and Respondents have been ordered to provide at least two court days' notice of its intent to remove Petitioner from this judicial district such that Petitioner cannot show irreparable harm warranting a TRO during the pendency of his habeas proceedings. See Granny Goose Foods, Inc. v. Bhd. of Teamsters, 415 U.S. 423, 439 (1974) (the underlying purpose of a TRO is "preserving the status quo and preventing irreparable harm just so long as is necessary to hold a hearing.") Accordingly, Petitioner's motion for a TRO (ECF 3) is DENIED. (tsn) (Entered: 07/23/2026)

#10

Jul 27, 2026

This action has been fully consented to according to General Order 26-05. The case will proceed before a magistrate judge. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (tsn) TEXT ONLY ENTRY (Entered: 07/27/2026)

Jul 27, 2026

Immigration 2241 Full Consent

#11

Jul 30, 2026

Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel (G-123)

#12

Jul 30, 2026

Return to Habeas Petition (2241)