Western District of Kentucky • 4:26-cv-00475

Yan v. Woosley

Active

Case Information

Filed: July 14, 2026
Assigned to: Benjamin Beaton
Referred to: Henry Brent Brennenstuhl
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee
Cause: 28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Active
Last Activity: August 26, 2026
Parties: View All Parties →

Docket Entries

#1
Jul 14, 2026
PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Filing fee $5, receipt number AKYWDC-4590889), filed by Kun Yan. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit EOIR Automated System Information, # 2 Exhibit Motion to BIA to Withdraw Appeal) (DLW) (Entered: 07/15/2026)
Main Document: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
#2
Jul 14, 2026
Case Assignment (Random Selection): Case Assigned to Judge Benjamin Beaton. (DLW) (Entered: 07/15/2026)
Main Document: Case Assignment
#3
Jul 15, 2026
NOTICE of Appearance by Jo E. Lawless on behalf of Todd Blanche, Markwayne Mullin, Samuel Olson (Lawless, Jo) (Entered: 07/15/2026)
Main Document: Notice of Appearance
Jul 15, 2026
REMARK: Electronic notification of the petition and any subsequent order constitutes valid service on all federal respondents named therein as of the date of this remark pursuant to the Memorandum of Understanding and Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States District Courts, which the Court is applying to these cases. (DLW)
Jul 15, 2026
Remark (Public)
#4
Jul 16, 2026
TEXT ORDER: Under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A), the Court refers this matter to Magistrate Judge Brennenstuhl for hearing and determining all pretrial matters, including non-dispositive motions. Judge Brennenstuhl may conduct a settlement conference in this matter at any time. This Notice of Electronic Filing is the Official ORDER for this entry. No document is attached.cc: Counsel, HBB-CM (HMC) (Entered: 07/16/2026)
Jul 16, 2026
Order Referring Case to Magistrate Judge
#5
Jul 23, 2026
TEXT ORDER: In response to the petition for a writ of habeas corpus (DN 1 ), the Court directs the Respondents to show cause, no later than 7/27/26, why the writ should not be granted. See 28 U.S.C. § 2243. The Respondents should address whether, considering the allegations in the petition, the petition is controlled by Lopez-Campos v. Raycraft, 175 F.4th 713 (6th Cir. 2026). Unless the parties file notice that they seek a hearing, the Court will presume that the petition presents no material factual disputes and decide it on the papers. The Clerk of Court shall forward by certified mail, return receipt requested, one copy of the petition and this order on each Respondent who has not been designated by the United States Attorney's Office, as agreed to by the Attorney's Office and the Clerk in the 1/20/26 Memorandum of Understanding, to receive electronic notice and service. This Notice of Electronic Filing is the Official ORDER for this entry. No document is attached. cc: counsel, Respondent Jason Woosley (via certified mail) w/ DN 1 (Petition) (JM) (Entered: 07/23/2026)
#6
Jul 23, 2026
CERTIFIED MAILING FROM THE COURT addressed to Respondent Jason Woosley re DN5 (Text Order), and DN 1 (Petition). (JM) (Entered: 07/23/2026)
Main Document: Notice (Other)
Jul 23, 2026
Order - TEXT ONLY
#7
Jul 30, 2026
RETURN RECEIPT signed on behalf of Respondent Jason Woosley re 6 CERTIFIED MAIL. (HMC) (Entered: 07/30/2026)
Main Document: Notice (Other)
Aug 21, 2026
Order to Show Cause
#9
Aug 26, 2026
Response to Order to Show Cause
Main Document: Response to Order to Show Cause

Parties

Woosley
Party
Yan
Party