District of Colorado • 1:26-cv-03087

#1

Jul 10, 2026

Second APPLICATION for Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 USC 2241 (Filing fee $ 5, Receipt Number ACODC-11133324)Attorney Annelise Araujo added to party Eddy Desire Rukundo(pty:pet), filed by Eddy Desire Rukundo. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit, # 2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Araujo, Annelise) (Entered: 07/10/2026)

#2

Jul 10, 2026

ADVISORY NOTICE OF NONCOMPLIANCE WITH COURT RULES/PROCEDURES: re: 1 Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by attorney Annelise M. Jatoba de Araujo. DO NOT REFILE THE DOCUMENT. Action to take - counsel must submit a change of contact request through PACER pursuant to D.C.COLO.LAttyR 5(c) and 3.5 of the Electronic Case Filing Procedures (Civil cases). (Text Only Entry) (jberr, ) (Entered: 07/10/2026)

#3

Jul 10, 2026

Case assigned to Judge Regina M. Rodriguez and drawn to Magistrate Judge N. Reid Neureiter. Text Only Entry. (jberr, ) (Entered: 07/10/2026)

#4

Jul 10, 2026

Magistrate Judge consent form issued pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c). (jberr, ) (Entered: 07/10/2026)

#5

Aug 13, 2026

ORDER. Upon review of the 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241, it is ORDERED that Petitioner shall SERVE Respondents with a copy of the 1 Petition, and accompanying papers, along with a copy of this Order, by e-mail and certified mail, on or before 8/17/2026. Petitioner shall promptly file proof of such service on the docket, and counsel for Respondents shall promptly enter their notices of appearance. Within seven days of service, Respondents shall SHOW CAUSE why the Petition shall not be granted. See, e.g., Yassine v. Collins, No. 1:25-cv-00786-ADA-SH, 2025 WL 1954064, at *1 (W.D. Tex. July 7, 2025) (explaining that while § 2243 refers to a three day deadline, this requirement is "subordinate to the district court's authority to set deadlines" itself, and granting respondents a fourteen day deadline to respond in order to "give [r]espondents adequate time to brief the issues" (quotations omitted)). Pursuant to the All Writs Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1651(a), and in order to preserve the Court's jurisdiction, Respondents SHALL NOT REMOVE Petitioner from the District of Colorado or the United States unless or until this Court or the Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit vacates this Order. See also Vizguerra-Ramirez v. Choate, et al., Case No. 1:25-cv-881, D. Colo., ECF No. 11 at 45 (collecting cases); F.T.C. v. Dean Foods Co., 384 U.S. 597, 603 (1966); Local 1814, Int'l Longshoremen's Ass'n v. New York Shipping Assn, 965 F.2d 1224, 1237 (2d Cir. 1992). SO ORDERED by Judge Regina M. Rodriguez on 8/13/2026. Text Only Entry (rmrja) (Entered: 08/13/2026)

Aug 13, 2026

Order

#6

Aug 17, 2026

AFFIDAVIT/RETURN of Service of Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus upon All Respondents, U.S. Attorney's Office, and U.S. Attorney General on 08/13/2026, filed by Petitioner Eddy Desire Rukundo (Araujo, Annelise) (Entered: 08/17/2026)

#7

Aug 24, 2026

RESPONSE to 5 Order,,,,,, by Respondents Juan Baltazar, Todd Blanche, Markwayne Mullin, George Valdez, David VenturellaAttorney Katherine Ann Ross added to party Juan Baltazar(pty:res), Attorney Katherine Ann Ross added to party Todd Blanche(pty:res), Attorney Katherine Ann Ross added to party Markwayne Mullin(pty:res), Attorney Katherine Ann Ross added to party George Valdez(pty:res), Attorney Katherine Ann Ross added to party David Venturella(pty:res). (Ross, Katherine) (Entered: 08/24/2026)

#8

Aug 31, 2026

ORDER. 1. The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, ECF No. 1, is GRANTED; 2. Respondents shall IMMEDIATELY RELEASE Petitioner on his own recognizance, along with all his personal belongings, without onerous conditions of release, including, without limitation, GPS monitoring, mandatory reporting, or other restrictions on his movement. Respondents shall facilitate Petitioners transportation from the detention facility by providing all necessary identity and travel documents to return to his primary address; 3. Respondents are ENJOINED from re-arresting or re-detaining Petitioner unless they demonstrate, by clear and convincing evidence at a pre- deprivation bond hearing before a neutral decisionmaker, that he is a flight risk or danger to the community such that his physical custody is legally justified pursuant to 8 U.S.C § 1226(a). At any such bond hearing, Respondents shall bear the burden of proof, and Petitioner shall be allowed to have counsel present. This injunction shall remain in effect until such time as this Court, or the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals, vacates this Order; 4. During such periods of time as Petitioner remains in Respondents' custody, Respondents shall continue to be ENJOINED from removing, transferring, or causing the removal or transfer of Petitioner from the District of Colorado until such time as this Court, or the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals, vacates this Order; 5. On or before September 3, 2026, Respondents shall file a status report certifying compliance with this Order. SO ORDERED by Judge Regina M. Rodriguez on 8/31/2026. (ccuen, ) (Entered: 08/31/2026)

#9

Sep 03, 2026

STATUS REPORT by Respondents Juan Baltazar, Todd Blanche, Markwayne Mullin, George Valdez, David Venturella. (Ross, Katherine) (Entered: 09/03/2026)

#10

Sep 04, 2026

FINAL JUDGMENT re: 8 Order, entered by Clerk on 9/4/2026. (kmyha) (Entered: 09/04/2026)