District of Massachusetts • 1:26-cv-13090

#1

Jul 03, 2026

Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus - 2241

#2

Jul 06, 2026

ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. District Judge Julia E. Kobick assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge Paul G. Levenson. (MBM) (Entered: 07/06/2026)

#3

Jul 06, 2026

General Order 19-02

#4

Jul 06, 2026

Service Order-2241 Petition

#5

Jul 06, 2026

Copies of the following were mailed to all respondents on 7/6/2026: 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2241) and 4 Order Concerning Service of Petition and Stay or Transfer of Removal (Currie, Haley) (Entered: 07/06/2026)

Jul 06, 2026

Notice of Case Assignment

Jul 06, 2026

Copy Mailed

#6

Jul 08, 2026

MOTION for Extension of Time to 7/17/2026 to File Response/Reply as to 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2241), by Todd Blanche, Patricia Hyde, Markwayne Mullin, David J. Venturella.(Farquhar, Rayford) (Entered: 07/08/2026)

#7

Jul 08, 2026

Answer/Response to Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus - 2241

#8

Jul 08, 2026

Notice of Withdrawal of Appearance

#9

Jul 08, 2026

District Judge Julia E. Kobick: ELECTRONIC ORDER granting 6 MOTION for Extension of Time to 7/17/2026 to File Response/Reply as to 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2241) (Currie, Haley) (Entered: 07/08/2026)

Jul 08, 2026

Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply

#10

Jul 15, 2026

Answer/Response to Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus - 2241

#11

Jul 16, 2026

District Judge Julia E. Kobick: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered. Petitioner Claudia Veronica Lopez Sanchez filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 on July 3, 2026 seeking her release from detention in the custody of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement. ECF 1 . On July 8, 2026, the respondents notified the Court that Lopez Sanchez had been released from custody on the same day that she was detained. ECF 7 . The petitioner has not disputed that representation, nor has she identified any collateral consequence from her detention. This case has therefore become moot because the petitioner has received all the relief she requested in her petition. See Leitao v. Reno, 311 F.3d 453, 455 (1st Cir. 2002).The respondents’ request to dismiss this action, ECF 10, is therefore GRANTED, and the petition is DISMISSED. (Currie, Haley) (Entered: 07/16/2026)

#12

Jul 16, 2026

Order Dismissing Case

Jul 16, 2026

Order