Northern District of Texas • 1:26-cv-00310
Sandhu v. Warden, Bluebonnet Detention Center
Completed
Case Information
Filed: June 29, 2026
Assigned to:
James Wesley Hendrix
Referred to:
—
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee
Cause:
28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Completed: August 28, 2026
Last Activity:
August 28, 2026
Parties:
View All Parties →
Docket Entries
#1
Jun 29, 2026
PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by VINEY SANDHU. In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the Judges Copy Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. (Filing fee $5; receipt number ATXNDC-16569463) Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: # 1 Cover Sheet) (Khatri, Himanshu) (Entered: 06/29/2026)
Main Document:
Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
#2
Jun 29, 2026
MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction filed by VINEY SANDHU with Brief/Memorandum in Support. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration(s), # 2 Exhibit(s), # 3 Proposed Order) (Khatri, Himanshu). Added MOTION for Injunction on 6/29/2026 (amg). (Entered: 06/29/2026)
Main Document:
MOTION
#3
Jun 29, 2026
New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the national and circuit indexes.) (amg) (Entered: 06/29/2026)
#4
Jun 29, 2026
ORDER. Before the Court is Viney Sandhu's emergency motion for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction. Dkt. No. 2 . Because the motion improperly requests the ultimate relief sought in the pending habeas petition, the motion is denied. Sandhu's petition (Dkt. No. 1 ) remains pending. (Ordered by Judge James Wesley Hendrix on 6/29/2026) (amg) (Entered: 06/29/2026)
Main Document:
Order on Motion for Injunction AND Order on Motion for TRO
#5
Jun 30, 2026
ELECTRONIC ORDER noting that Himanshu Khatri is not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas. Himanshu Khatri is ordered to submit an application for admission pro hac vice within 14 days of this Order to continue representation in this action. (Ordered by Judge James Wesley Hendrix on 6/30/2026) (chmb) (Entered: 06/30/2026)
Jun 30, 2026
Order
#6
Jul 26, 2026
Application for Admission Pro Hac Vice with Certificate of Good Standing (Filing fee $100; Receipt number ATXNDC-16648839) filed by Viney Sandhu (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order, # 2 Exhibit(s) CERTIFICATE OF GOOD STANDING) (Khatri, Himanshu) (Entered: 07/26/2026)
Main Document:
Application
#7
Jul 27, 2026
ELECTRONIC ORDER granting 6 Application for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Himanshu Khatri. Important Reminder: Unless excused for cause, an attorney who is not an ECF user must register within 14 days of the date the attorney appears in a case pursuant to LR 5.1(f) and LCrR 49.2(g). (Ordered by Judge James Wesley Hendrix on 7/27/2026) (chmb) (Entered: 07/27/2026)
Jul 27, 2026
Order on Application for Admission Pro Hac Vice
#8
Aug 28, 2026
Notice of Supplemental Authority and Supplemental Facts and MOTIION for Expedited Consideration of Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Viney Sandhu with Brief/Memorandum in Support. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit(s)) (Khatri, Himanshu) Modified docket text to match document title on 8/28/2026 (amg). (Entered: 08/28/2026)
Main Document:
Notice
#9
Aug 28, 2026
ORDER. The Court has carefully considered the factual allegations and legal contentions raised in the petition. The Court has also considered hundreds of habeas petitions that sought relief on the same grounds raised in Sandhu's petition. The Court previously found these arguments unavailing. The Court has considered them anew in this petition and concludes that habeas relief is unwarranted. Because it appears from the face of the petition that Sandhu is not entitled to relief, the Court denies the petition. Dkt. No. 1 . The Clerk of Court is directed to serve this Order electronically on the United States Attorney's Office for the Northern District of Texas pursuant to the current Service of Process Agreement for federal habeas petitions under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. Attorneys Tami C Parker-DOJ and Brian Walters Stoltz-DOJ for Respondents added. (Ordered by Judge James Wesley Hendrix on 8/28/2026) (amg) (Entered: 08/28/2026)
#10
Aug 28, 2026
FINAL JUDGMENT. For the reasons stated in the Court's order (Dkt. No. 9 ), it is ordered, adjudged, and decreed that: The petition for a writ of habeas corpus (Dkt. No. 1) is denied. The Clerk of Court is directed to close the case. (Ordered by Judge James Wesley Hendrix on 8/28/2026) (amg) (Entered: 08/28/2026)
Main Document:
Judgment
Parties
Party
Party
Party
Attorney
Firm