Western District of Pennsylvania • 3:26-cv-01172
Abdurakhmonov v. Moshannon Valley Processing Center
Completed
Case Information
Filed: June 18, 2026
Assigned to:
J. Nicholas Ranjan
Referred to:
—
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee
Cause:
28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Pretrial Detainee)
Completed: July 24, 2026
Last Activity:
July 24, 2026
Parties:
View All Parties →
Docket Entries
#1
Jun 18, 2026
PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Filing fee $5, Receipt Number 111), filed by Ramziddin Abdurakhmonov. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet, # 2 Exhibit A - Order of the Immigration Judge, # 3 Exhibit B - Filing Receipt for Appeal or Motion) (ea) (Entered: 06/18/2026)
Main Document:
ATTORNEY Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Credit Card Required)
#2
Jun 18, 2026
ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE to the United States District Court for Western District of Pennsylvania; The Clerk of Court is further directed to CLOSE this case. Signed by Honorable Robert D. Mariani on 6/18/2026. (clc) (Entered: 06/18/2026)
Main Document:
Order on Motion to Transfer Case
#3
Jun 18, 2026
Case transferred in from District of Pennsylvania Middle; Case Number 3:26-cv-01687. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received. (Entered: 06/18/2026)
Main Document:
Case
Jun 18, 2026
Judge J. Nicholas Ranjan added. (sms)
#4
Jun 22, 2026
Case Management Order
Main Document:
Case Management Order
#5
Jun 22, 2026
STANDING ZADVYDAS ORDER. In alien habeas cases, petitioners often challenge their detention as being unconstitutionally prolonged, either at the outset or later during the pendency of their cases. See Zadvydas v. Davis, 533 U.S. 678 (2001) ("The serious constitutional problem arising out of a statute that, in these circumstances, permits an indefinite, perhaps permanent, deprivation of human liberty without any such protection is obvious.") In order to monitor and assess the validity of any such potential claim, Respondents shall file a status report updating the Court on Petitioner's detention status six months from today. No such report need be filed if Petitioner has been released prior to that date. Signed by Judge J. Nicholas Ranjan on 6/22/2026. Text-only entry; no PDF document will issue. This text-only entry constitutes the Order of the Court or Notice on the matter. (pak) (Entered: 06/22/2026)
Jun 22, 2026
Order
#6
Jun 24, 2026
NOTICE of Appearance by Brendan T. Conway on behalf of TODD BLANCHE, MOSHANNON VALLEY PROCESSING CENTER, MARKWAYNE MULLIN, John Tsoukaris, DAVID VENTURELLA. (Conway, Brendan) (Entered: 06/24/2026)
Main Document:
NOTICE
#7
Jul 22, 2026
RESPONSE to 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus,, filed by TODD BLANCHE, MOSHANNON VALLEY PROCESSING CENTER, MARKWAYNE MULLIN, John Tsoukaris, DAVID VENTURELLA. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit) (Conway, Brendan) (Entered: 07/22/2026)
Main Document:
RESPONSE
#8
Jul 23, 2026
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by TODD BLANCHE, MOSHANNON VALLEY PROCESSING CENTER, MARKWAYNE MULLIN, John Tsoukaris, DAVID VENTURELLA re 7 Response to Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Conway, Brendan) (Entered: 07/23/2026)
Main Document:
CERTIFICATE
#9
Jul 24, 2026
ORDER denying 1 petition for writ of habeas. As an initial matter, the Court notes that it granted Petitioner's initial writ in a related case (2:26-cv-01215) and Petitioner was provided a bond hearing pursuant to the Court's order. See 2:26-cv-01215-NR at ECF 9 & ECF 10. Petitioner was denied bond because the Immigration Judge determined he is a flight risk. ECF 10. Petitioner then filed another 1 petition for writ with this Court in which he seeks release. This Court has jurisdiction to review the bond hearing to determine whether it was fundamentally fair and satisfied Due Process, and after reviewing the record, including the transcript from Petitioner's bond hearing, the Court finds that the hearing was fundamentally fair. The requirements of a fundamentally fair hearing are that Petitioner: "(1) is entitled to factfinding based on a record produced before the decisionmaker and disclosed to him or her; (2) must be allowed to make arguments on his or her own behalf; and (3) has the right to an individualized determination of his [or her] interests." Ghanem v. Warden Essex Cnty. Corr. Facility, No. 21-1908, 2022 WL 574624, at *2 (3d Cir. Feb. 25, 2022) (quoting Kamara v. Att'y Gen. of U.S., 420 F.3d 202, 211 (3d Cir. 2005)). The Court finds that these requirements were met, and can otherwise discern no other flaws in the fairness of the hearing that rise to the level of a constitutional violation. Signed by Judge J. Nicholas Ranjan on 7/24/2026. Text-only entry; no PDF document will issue. This text-only entry constitutes the Order of the Court or Notice on the matter. (pak) (Entered: 07/24/2026)
#10
Jul 24, 2026
FINAL JUDGMENT, entered consistent with the above order (ECF 9). Signed by Judge J. Nicholas Ranjan on 7/24/2026. Text-only entry; no PDF document will issue. This text-only entry constitutes the Order of the Court or Notice on the matter. (pak) (Entered: 07/24/2026)
Jul 24, 2026
Judgment (Rule 58)
Jul 24, 2026
Order
Parties
Party
Party
Party
Party
Party
Attorney
Attorney
Firm