District of Colorado • 1:26-cv-02729

#1

Jun 18, 2026

Emergency APPLICATION for Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 USC 2241 (Filing fee $ 5, Receipt Number ACODC-11088147)Attorney Eduardo R. Soto added to party Kensy Alvarez Gonzalez(pty:pet), filed by Kensy Alvarez Gonzalez. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet, # 2 Summons, # 3 Summons)(Soto, Eduardo) (Entered: 06/18/2026)

#2

Jun 18, 2026

ADVISORY NOTICE OF NONCOMPLIANCE WITH COURT RULES/PROCEDURES: re: 1 Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by attorney Eduardo R. Soto. DO NOT REFILE THE DOCUMENT. Action to take - counsel must submit a change of contact request through PACER pursuant to D.C.COLO.LAttyR 5(c) and 3.5 of the Electronic Case Filing Procedures (Civil cases). (Text Only Entry) (jberr, ) (Entered: 06/22/2026)

#3

Jun 18, 2026

Case assigned to Chief Judge Daniel D. Domenico and drawn to Magistrate Judge Timothy P. OHara. Text Only Entry. (jberr, ) (Entered: 06/22/2026)

#4

Jun 22, 2026

Magistrate Judge consent form issued pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c). No summons issued for this case type. (jberr, ) (Entered: 06/22/2026)

#5

Jun 23, 2026

ORDER re: 1 Emergency Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus.The petitioner must serve the respondents with the petition pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4. The petitioner need not serve a summons with a copy of the petition. The petitioner must promptly file proof of service in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(l)(1).The petitioner may also attempt to contact the respondents by any other method reasonably calculated to give actual notice of the petition.Within three business days of receiving actual notice of the petition, whether by formal service or otherwise, the respondents must file a status report identifying: (1) whether the petitioner was in the respondents' custody at the time his habeas petition was filed, and if so, the District in which he was confined at that time; and (2) whether the petitioner is currently in the respondents' custody, and (a) if so, the petitioner's location and the statute or other legal authority under which he is detained, or (b) if not, the date and location of the petitioner's release and the statute or other legal authority under which he was released.SO ORDERED by Chief Judge Daniel D. Domenico on 06/23/2026. Text Only Entry. (agryan) (Entered: 06/23/2026)

#6

Jun 23, 2026

ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Timothy P. OHara. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A) and (B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a) and (b), this case is referred to the assigned United States Magistrate Judge to (1) convene a scheduling conference under Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) and enter a scheduling order meeting the requirements of Local Civ. R. 16.2, (2) conduct such status conferences and issue such orders necessary for compliance with the scheduling order, including amendments or modifications of the scheduling order upon a showing of good cause, (3) hear and determine pretrial matters, including discovery and other non-dispositive motions, (4) conduct hearings, including evidentiary hearings, and submit proposed findings of fact and recommendations for rulings on dispositive motions, and (5) pursuant to Local Civ. R. 16.6 and at the discretion of the Magistrate Judge, convene such early neutral evaluation and/or settlement conferences and direct related procedures as may facilitate resolution of this case without the necessity of a motion or prior authorization of the undersigned. SO ORDERED by Chief Judge Daniel D. Domenico on 06/23/2026. Text Only Entry. (agryan) (Entered: 06/23/2026)

Jun 23, 2026

Order

Jun 23, 2026

Order Referring Case to Magistrate Judge

#7

Jul 22, 2026

ORDER. On 6/23/2026, I ordered the petitioner to "serve the respondents with the petition pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4" and "promptly file proof of service in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(l)(1)." Doc. 5. No proof of service has been filed. The petitioner is reminded that he must properly serve the respondents on or before 9/16/2026. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m) (if defendants are not served within ninety days of filing complaint, court may dismiss action without prejudice unless plaintiff shows good cause for the failure). I also instructed the petitioner that he may "attempt to contact the respondents by any other method reasonably calculated to give actual notice of the petition" and directed the respondents to file a status report regarding the petitioner's custody status within three business days of receiving such notice. Doc. 5. No status report has been filed. The petitioner's counsel is ORDERED to file a status report on or before 7/29/2026 addressing (1) whether the respondents have been provided with notice of the petition, and (2) whether the petitioner's whereabouts and custody status have been ascertained. If the petitioner does not file a status report by 7/29/2026 as ordered above, this case may be dismissed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) for failure to prosecute or to comply with a court order. SO ORDERED by Chief Judge Daniel D. Domenico on 7/22/2026. Text Only Entry (ggill, ) (Entered: 07/22/2026)

Jul 22, 2026

Order

#8

Jul 30, 2026

ORDER DISMISSING CASE. The petitioner has not filed any response to my previous order, Doc. 7. Accordingly, 1 Emergency Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to prosecute or to comply with a court order. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); Local Civ. R. 41.1. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case. SO ORDERED by Chief Judge Daniel D. Domenico on 7/30/2026. Text Only Entry. (rkeec) (Entered: 07/30/2026)

#9

Jul 30, 2026

FINAL JUDGMENT by Clerk entered by Chief Judge Daniel D. Domenico on 7/30/2026. (rkeec) (Entered: 07/30/2026)

Jul 30, 2026

Order Dismissing Case