Northern District of Illinois • 1:26-cv-07136

#1

Jun 17, 2026

PETITION for writ of habeas corpus filed by Joel Cerrito Peru against Samuel Olson Filing fee $ 5, receipt number AILNDC-25266926. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit)(Htun, June) (Entered: 06/17/2026)

#2

Jun 17, 2026

CIVIL Cover Sheet (Htun, June) (Entered: 06/17/2026)

#3

Jun 17, 2026

ATTORNEY Appearance for Petitioner Joel Cerrito Peru by June J. Htun (Htun, June) (Entered: 06/17/2026)

#9

Jun 18, 2026

DESIGNATION of Craig Arthur Oswald as U.S. Attorney for Respondents Todd Blanche, Markwayne Mullin, Samuel Olson, David J Venturella (Oswald, Craig) (Entered: 06/18/2026)

#10

Jun 18, 2026

DESIGNATION of Joshua Samuel Press as U.S. Attorney for Respondents Todd Blanche, Markwayne Mullin, Samuel Olson, David J Venturella (Press, Joshua) (Entered: 06/18/2026)

#11

Jun 18, 2026

DESIGNATION of Geoffrey Park Gilpin as U.S. Attorney for Respondents Todd Blanche, Markwayne Mullin, Samuel Olson, David J Venturella (Gilpin, Geoffrey) (Entered: 06/18/2026)

#12

Jun 18, 2026

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: Petitioner's petition for a writ of habeas corpus 1 is denied for the reasons explained in Rodriguez v. Olson. 814 F. Supp. 3d 945 (N.D. Ill. 2026). Petitioner has been detained by Immigration and Customs Enforcement. He challenges his mandatory detention under the Immigration and Nationality Act, arguing that he is statutorily entitled to a bond hearing and that detention without an individualized assessment of flight risk or dangerousness violates his rights under the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment. For the reasons explained in Cruz Rodriguez, venue is proper in this court and the court has jurisdiction to review these claims. But petitioner is not entitled to a bond hearing under the INA and his mandatory detention does not violate the Due Process Clause. Enter final judgment. Civil case terminated. Mailed notice. (lxk, ) (Entered: 06/18/2026)

#13

Jun 18, 2026

ENTERED JUDGMENT. Mailed notice. (lxk, ) (Entered: 06/18/2026)

Jun 18, 2026

CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Martha M. Pacold. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Albert Berry, III. Case assignment: Random assignment. (Civil Category 2). (mam, )

Jun 18, 2026

CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached Consent To form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (mam, )