Middle District of Florida • 2:26-cv-01737

Barrera Acosta v. Warden, Florida Soft Side South Detention Center

Active

Case Information

Filed: May 22, 2026
Assigned to: Sheri Polster Chappell
Referred to: Kevin R. Huguelet
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee
Cause: 28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Active
Last Activity: September 14, 2026
Parties: View All Parties →

Docket Entries

#1
May 22, 2026
PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus - Federal (Filing fee $ 5.00, receipt number 17679) filed by Gustavo Barrera Acosta. (Attachments: # 1 Attachments, # 2 Mailing Envelope)(JTM) (Entered: 05/27/2026)
Main Document: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
#2
May 28, 2026
ORDER to respond and show cause why the petition should not be granted. The Clerk is directed to serve the petition. The Petitioner has 3 days to reply to the response to petition. Response to petition due by 6/4/2026. Signed by Judge Sheri Polster Chappell on 5/28/2026. (TDC) (Entered: 05/28/2026)
Main Document: Order to Respond to Habeas Petition
#3
Jun 04, 2026
NOTICE of Appearance by Emma Genevieve Refuveille on behalf of Warden, Florida Soft Side South Detention Center (Refuveille, Emma) (Entered: 06/04/2026)
Main Document: Notice of appearance
#4
Jun 04, 2026
NOTICE of Appearance by Nicholas John Peter Meros on behalf of Warden, Florida Soft Side South Detention Center (Meros, Nicholas) (Entered: 06/04/2026)
Main Document: Notice of appearance
#5
Jun 04, 2026
MOTION to Dismiss Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by Warden, Florida Soft Side South Detention Center. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B)(Meros, Nicholas) (Entered: 06/04/2026)
Main Document: Dismiss
#6
Jun 04, 2026
RESPONSE to 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by Attorney General of the United States. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit D, # 5 Exhibit E, # 6 Exhibit F, # 7 Exhibit G, # 8 Exhibit H, # 9 Exhibit I, # 10 Exhibit J)(Sullins, Somadina) (Entered: 06/04/2026)
Main Document: Response to habeas petition
#7
Jun 05, 2026
ENDORSED ORDER denying Respondent Warden of Florida Soft Side South Detention Center's Motion to Dismiss Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. 5). "The federal habeas statute straightforwardly provides that the proper respondent to a habeas petition is the person who has custody over the petitioner." Rumsfeld v. Padilla, 542 U.S. 426, 434 (2004) (cleaned up). While courts have recognized that immigration detainees in state-run facilities can bring habeas claims against certain federal officials, see, e.g., Masingene v. Martin, 424 F. Supp. 3d 1298, 1301 (S.D. Fla. 2020), the immediate custodian is also a proper respondent. As the immediate custodian of the petitioner, the Warden is a proper respondent to his habeas petition. Signed by Judge Sheri Polster Chappell on 6/5/2026. (SAP) (Entered: 06/05/2026)
Jun 05, 2026
Order on Motion to Dismiss
#8
Jun 15, 2026
REPLY re 6 Response to habeas petition, by Gustavo Barrera Acosta. (Attachments: # 1 Mailing Envelope)(SJD) (Entered: 06/15/2026)
Main Document: Reply to response to petition
#9
Jun 22, 2026
NOTICE of change of address by Gustavo Barrera Acosta (Attachments: # 1 Mailing Envelope)(SJD) (Entered: 06/22/2026)
Main Document: Notice of change of address
#11
Aug 19, 2026
NOTICE of change of address by Gustavo Barrera Acosta (Attachments: # 1 Mailing Envelope)(JTM) (Entered: 08/21/2026)
Main Document: Notice of change of address
#12
Aug 28, 2026
ENDORSED ORDER. Within 7 days, the government shall supplement its response with any recent efforts made to remove the petitioner from the United States. Signed by Judge Sheri Polster Chappell on 8/28/2026. (NMC) (Entered: 08/28/2026)
Aug 28, 2026
Order
#13
Sep 05, 2026
SUPPLEMENT re 6 Response to habeas petition (as ordered by the Court) by Attorney General of the United States. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, Declaration of Deportation Officer)(Sullins, Somadina) (Entered: 09/05/2026)
Main Document: Supplement
#14
Sep 14, 2026
OPINION AND ORDER. Gustavo Barrera Acosta's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. 1) remains under advisement. Within 30 days of this Order, ICE shall conduct a custody review to determine whether Barrera Acosta poses a danger to the co mmunity sufficient to justify continued detention. Within seven days of the custody review, the respondents shall file a supplemental response, addressing the results of the review and any updates on removal efforts. If ICE determines dangerousness justifies continued detention, the supplemental response must explain why. Barrera Acosta may file a reply within three days of the supplemental response. Signed by Judge Sheri Polster Chappell on 9/14/2026. (NMC)
Main Document: Opinion and order