Eastern District of California • 1:26-cv-03802

(HC) Redondo-Lopez v. Warden

Completed

Case Information

Filed: May 18, 2026
Assigned to: Dena M. Coggins
Referred to: Carolyn K. Delaney
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee
Cause: 8:1105(a) Aliens: Habeas Corpus to Release INS Detainee
Completed: June 09, 2026
Last Activity: August 05, 2026
Parties: View All Parties →

Docket Entries

#1
May 18, 2026
PETITION for WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS against All Respondents by Olbin Jeremias Redondo-Lopez. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet, # 2 Supplement) (Deputy Clerk OML) (Entered: 05/19/2026)
Main Document: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
#2
May 18, 2026
MOTION for TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER by Olbin Jeremias Redondo-Lopez. (Deputy Clerk OML) (Entered: 05/19/2026)
Main Document: Temporary Restraining Order
May 18, 2026
RECEIPT number 100008206 for $5.00 from Olbin Redondo-Lopez. (Deputy Clerk OML)
#3
May 19, 2026
IMMIGRATION NEW CASE DOCUMENTS (Deputy Clerk OML) (Entered: 05/19/2026)
Main Document: Immigration New Case Documents
May 19, 2026
Service by Mail
May 19, 2026
SERVICE BY MAIL: 3 Immigration New Case Documents served on Olbin Jeremias Redondo-Lopez. (Deputy Clerk OML)
#4
May 20, 2026
DESIGNATION of COUNSEL FOR SERVICE. Added attorney Camilo Rodriguez, GOVT for Warden (Rodriguez, Camilo) (Entered: 05/20/2026)
Main Document: DESIGNATION
#5
May 20, 2026
MINUTE ORDER issued by the Courtroom Deputy for District Judge Dena M. Coggins on 5/20/2026: The court has reviewed Petitioner's 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and 2 Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order. In that Motion, Petitioner states he was detained on 12/15/2025, over 150 days before filing that Motion. Petitioner does not explain why he did not seek injunctive relief sooner. Notably, Local Rule 231(b) states: "In considering a motion for a temporary restraining order, the Court will consider whether the applicant could have sought relief by motion for preliminary injunction at an earlier date without the necessity for seeking last-minute relief by motion for temporary restraining order." Because Petitioner's 2 Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order is untimely, the court will CONVERT that Motion to a 2 Motion for Preliminary Injunction. Further, the court has previously addressed the legal issues raised by Count One of the 1 Petition. See e.g., Selis Tinoco v. Noem, 1:25-cv-01762-DC-JDP, 2025 WL 3567862 (E.D. Cal. Dec. 14, 2025), Labrador-Prato v. Noem, 1:25-cv-01598-DC-SCR, 2025 WL 3458802 (E.D. Cal. Dec. 2, 2025), and D.L.C. v. Wofford, 1:25-cv-01996-DC-JDP, 2026 WL 25511 (E.D. Cal. Jan. 5, 2026). The court is contemplating ruling directly on the Petition, with the understanding that the court will also consider any arguments made and exhibits submitted in support of the Motion for a Preliminary Injunction. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 65(a)(2) ("Before or after beginning the hearing on a motion for a preliminary injunction, the court may advance the trial on the merits and consolidate it with the hearing."); see also 28 U.S.C. § 2243 ("The court shall summarily hear and determine the facts, and dispose of [a petitioner's habeas petition] as law and justice require."); A.R. v. Chestnut, No. 1:26-cv-00551-KES-SAB, 2026 WL 227112, at *1 (E.D. Cal. Jan. 28, 2026) (considering preliminary injunction and merits of habeas petition simultaneously). Respondents shall file an Opposition or Statement of Non-Opposition to the 2 Motion for Preliminary Injunction by 5/22/2026. In their response, Respondents shall substantively address whether there are any factual or legal issues in this case that materially distinguish it from the court's prior orders listed above. Petitioner may file a Reply by 6/5/2026. Both parties should address whether they oppose the court ruling directly on the Petition, albeit as to Count One only, to the extent a ruling on that Count entitles Petitioner to the relief sought in the Petition. The matter is not set for a hearing though the court may set one should it later be determined that a hearing is necessary. (Text Only Entry) (Deputy Clerk CRS) (Entered: 05/20/2026)
May 20, 2026
Service by Mail
May 20, 2026
Minute Order AND ~Util - Set Motion and F&R Deadlines/Hearings
May 20, 2026
SERVICE BY MAIL: Minute Order, filed at Doc. No. 5, served on Olbin Jeremias Redondo-Lopez. (Text Only Entry) (Deputy Clerk CRS)
#6
May 22, 2026
RESPONSE to 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus; OPPOSITION to 2 Motion for Temporary Restraining Order by Respondent Warden. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 5, # 6 Exhibit 6, # 7 Exhibit 7)(Rodriguez, Camilo) Modified on 5/28/2026 (HAH). (Entered: 05/22/2026)
Main Document: RESPONSE
#9
Jun 08, 2026
REPLY to 6 Opposition by Olbin Jeremias Redondo-Lopez. (Deputy Clerk VLK) Modified on 6/22/2026 (HAH). (Entered: 06/10/2026)
Main Document: REPLY
#7
Jun 09, 2026
Order AND Order on Motion for TRO AND ~Util - Terminate Civil Case
Main Document: Order AND Order on Motion for TRO AND ~Util - Terminate Civil Case
#8
Jun 09, 2026
Judgment
Main Document: Judgment
Jun 09, 2026
SERVICE BY MAIL: 7 Order & 8 Judgment served on Olbin Jeremias Redondo-Lopez. (Deputy Clerk RRB)
Jun 09, 2026
Service by Mail
Aug 05, 2026
Minute Order
Aug 05, 2026
Service by Mail

Parties

(HC) Redondo-Lopez
Party
Warden
Party