Western District of Texas • 5:26-cv-03096

#1

May 12, 2026

Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus ( Filing fee $ 5 receipt number ATXWDC-21927578), filed by Sandybel Vasquez Santos. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet, # 2 Exhibit, # 3 Exhibit)(Garza Izaguirre, Patricio) (Entered: 05/12/2026)

#2

May 12, 2026

ORDER FOR SERVICE--Upon review, it is ORDERED that notice of electronic filing (NEF) of the Petition (Dkt. No. 1) and this Order to the United States Attorney in San Antonio, Texas shall constitute service on the Federal Respondents, as required by the Rules Governing § 2254 Cases1 and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5, and on all Respondents unless otherwise contested.2 It is further ORDERED that Respondents must file a response to the Petition (Dkt. No. 1) within 7 days of electronic service.. Signed by Judge Orlando L. Garcia. (vl) (Entered: 05/12/2026)

May 12, 2026

If ordered by the court, all referrals will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Stephenson (ab5)

May 12, 2026

Case assigned to Judge Orlando L. Garcia. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (ab5)

May 12, 2026

To be Referred to SA Mag Judge

May 12, 2026

Case Assigned/Reassigned

#3

May 13, 2026

STANDING ORDER for procedure in cases before Judge Garcia. All parties and counsel are directed to review Judge Garcia's Standing Order containing rules of practice, particularly the requirement of conference before filing a Motion to Dismiss under Federal Rule 12(b)(6). Failure to follow these rules of practice could result in the Court striking the Motion to Dismiss on its own initiative without further notice. Signed by Judge Orlando L. Garcia. (r013) (Entered: 05/13/2026)

#4

May 19, 2026

Response

#5

May 21, 2026

Memorandum in Support

#6

May 27, 2026

Order AND ~Util - Terminate Civil Case

#7

Jun 08, 2026

Response

#8

Jul 08, 2026

Enforce Judgment

#9

Jul 15, 2026

Response

Aug 02, 2026

Order on Motion to Enforce Judgment

Aug 02, 2026

Text Order DENYING 8 Opposed Motion to Enforce Judgment. The Court ordered that Petitioner be given a bond hearing, and Petitioner received one. Under the INA, the Court lacks jurisdiction to review an immigration judge's denial of bond following the custody redetermination hearing to which those detained under § 1226(a) are entitled. Although Petitioner, as an applicant for admission mandatorily detained under § 1225(b), was not entitled under the INA to such a bond hearing, the Court determined that he was still entitled to as much process as those detained under § 1226(a), albeit on due process grounds. The Court cannot conclude, however, that an applicant for admission is entitled to even greater process with respect to custody redeterminations than those who are statutorily entitled to such redeterminations. Entered by Judge Orlando L. Garcia. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (ROlc)