District of Colorado • 1:26-cv-01993

Jaramillo-Moreno v. Baltasar

Active

Case Information

Filed: May 08, 2026
Assigned to: Daniel Desmond Domenico
Referred to: Scott T. Varholak
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee
Cause: 28:2241in - Habeas Corpus: INS
Active
Last Activity: July 31, 2026
Parties: View All Parties →

Docket Entries

#1
May 08, 2026
APPLICATION for Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 USC 2241 (Filing fee $ 5, Receipt Number ACODC-11000960)Attorney Jim Salvator added to party DIXON JARAMILLO MORENO(pty:pet), filed by DIXON JARAMILLO MORENO. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit, # 2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Salvator, Jim) (Entered: 05/08/2026)
Main Document: APPLICATION
#2
May 08, 2026
Case assigned to Chief Judge Daniel D. Domenico and drawn to Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak. Text Only Entry. (jberr, ) (Entered: 05/11/2026)
#3
May 11, 2026
Magistrate Judge consent form issued pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c). (jberr, ) (Entered: 05/11/2026)
Main Document: Magistrate
#4
May 11, 2026
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE.The petitioner must serve the respondents with 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4. The petitioner need not serve a summons with a copy of the petition. The petitioner must promptly file proof of service in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(l)(1).Having reviewed the petition, I find that good cause appears, and it is therefore ORDERED that the respondents must SHOW CAUSE within three weeks after service of the petition why the application for a writ of habeas corpus should not be granted. The petitioner may file a reply within two weeks of service of the response(s).SO ORDERED by Chief Judge Daniel D. Domenico on 05/11/2026. Text Only Entry. (agryan) (Entered: 05/11/2026)
#5
May 11, 2026
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A) and (B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a) and (b), this case is referred to the assigned United States Magistrate Judge to (1) convene a scheduling conference under Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) and enter a scheduling order meeting the requirements of Local Civ. R. 16.2, (2) conduct such status conferences and issue such orders necessary for compliance with the scheduling order, including amendments or modifications of the scheduling order upon a showing of good cause, (3) hear and determine pretrial matters, including discovery and other non-dispositive motions, (4) conduct hearings, including evidentiary hearings, and submit proposed findings of fact and recommendations for rulings on dispositive motions, and (5) pursuant to Local Civ. R. 16.6 and at the discretion of the Magistrate Judge, convene such early neutral evaluation and/or settlement conferences and direct related procedures as may facilitate resolution of this case without the necessity of a motion or prior authorization of the undersigned. SO ORDERED by Chief Judge Daniel D. Domenico on 05/11/2026. Text Only Entry. (agryan) (Entered: 05/11/2026)
#6
May 11, 2026
First AMENDED APPLICATION for Writ of Habeas Corpus 2241, filed by Dixon Miguel Jaramillo-Moreno.(Salvator, Jim) (Entered: 05/11/2026)
Main Document: First
#7
May 11, 2026
AMENDED ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE.The petitioner must serve the respondents with 6 First Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4. The petitioner need not serve a summons with a copy of the petition. The petitioner must promptly file proof of service in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(l)(1).Having reviewed the First Amended Petition, I find that good cause appears, and it is therefore ORDERED that the respondents must SHOW CAUSE within three weeks after service of the petition why the application for a writ of habeas corpus should not be granted. The petitioner may file a reply within two weeks of service of the response(s).SO ORDERED by Chief Judge Daniel D. Domenico on 05/11/2026. Text Only Entry. (agryan) (Entered: 05/11/2026)
#8
May 11, 2026
ORDER re: 6 First Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. Pursuant to Local Civil Rule 15.1(a), no later than 5/15/2026 the petitioner must file a notice of filing the amended petition, and attach as an exhibit to the notice a copy of the amended petition that strikes through (e.g., strikes through) the text deleted and underlines (e.g., underlines) the text added. SO ORDERED by Chief Judge Daniel D. Domenico on 05/11/2026. Text Only Entry. (agryan) (Entered: 05/11/2026)
May 11, 2026
Order Referring Case to Magistrate Judge
May 11, 2026
Order to Show Cause
May 11, 2026
Order
#9
May 17, 2026
Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond
Main Document: Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond
#10
May 22, 2026
SUMMONS Returned Executed upon Respondents defendant(s) Dixon Miguel Jaramillo-Moreno served on 5/11/2026, answer due 7/10/2026. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Baltasar, # 2 Exhibit Valdez, # 3 Exhibit McNeilly, # 4 Exhibit Mullin, # 5 Exhibit Blanche)(Salvator, Jim) (Entered: 05/22/2026)
Main Document: SUMMONS
#11
May 26, 2026
ORDER GRANTING 9 Petitioner's Unopposed Motion for Leave to File Notice of Amended Petition Out of Time and Notice of Filing First Amended Petition. Docs. 9 and 9-1 are accepted for filing. SO ORDERED by Chief Judge Daniel D. Domenico on 05/26/2026. Text Only Entry.(agryan) (Entered: 05/26/2026)
May 26, 2026
Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond
#12
Jun 08, 2026
RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE re 7 by Respondents Juan Baltasar, Todd Blanche, Markwayne Mullin, George ValdezAttorney Logan P. Brown added to party Juan Baltasar(pty:res), Attorney Logan P. Brown added to party Todd Blanche(pty:res), Attorney Logan P. Brown added to party Markwayne Mullin(pty:res), Attorney Logan P. Brown added to party George Valdez(pty:res). (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C)(Brown, Logan) (Entered: 06/08/2026)
Main Document: RESPONSE
#13
Jun 09, 2026
REPLY to 12 Response to Order to Show Cause, Traverse by Petitioner Dixon Miguel Jaramillo-Moreno. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit)(Salvator, Jim) (Entered: 06/09/2026)
Main Document: REPLY
#14
Jul 01, 2026
ORDER.In light of Santillan Quiroz v. Mullin, — F.4th —, No. 26-6019, 2026 WL 1876709 (10th Cir. June 30, 2026), within one week of this Order the respondents must either:(a) provide the petitioner with a bond hearing before an immigration judge pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1226(a) and 8 C.F.R. §§ 236.1(d)(1), 1003.19, & 1236.1(d)(1) or else release the petitioner, and file a status report stating the results of any bond hearing that was conducted or the date of the petitioner's release if no bond hearing was held; or(b) show cause why this case is distinguishable from Santillan Quiroz and the application for a writ of habeas corpus should not be granted.SO ORDERED by Chief Judge Daniel D. Domenico on 07/01/2026. Text Only Entry. (agryan) (Entered: 07/01/2026)
Jul 01, 2026
Order
#15
Jul 07, 2026
Order
Main Document: Order
#16
Jul 08, 2026
STATUS REPORT by Respondents Juan Baltasar, Todd Blanche, Markwayne Mullin, George Valdez. (Brown, Logan) (Entered: 07/08/2026)
Main Document: STATUS
#17
Jul 08, 2026
ORDER re: 15 Emergency Motion to Enforce the Court's July 1, 2026 Order and for Immediate Release. The respondents must respond to the motion on or before 7/14/2026. SO ORDERED by Chief Judge Daniel D. Domenico on 07/08/2026. Text Only Entry. (agryan) (Entered: 07/08/2026)
Jul 08, 2026
Order
#18
Jul 10, 2026
SUPPLEMENT/AMENDMENT to 15 MOTION for Order to Release ICE detainee by Petitioner Dixon Miguel Jaramillo-Moreno. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit)(Salvator, Jim) (Entered: 07/10/2026)
Main Document: SUPPLEMENT/AMENDMENT
#19
Jul 11, 2026
NOTICE re 15 MOTION for Order to Conferral with Opposing Counsel by Petitioner Dixon Miguel Jaramillo-Moreno (Salvator, Jim) (Entered: 07/11/2026)
Main Document: NOTICE
#20
Jul 14, 2026
RESPONSE to 15 MOTION for Order to filed by Respondents Juan Baltasar, Todd Blanche, Markwayne Mullin, George Valdez. (Brown, Logan) (Entered: 07/14/2026)
Main Document: RESPONSE
#21
Jul 14, 2026
REPLY to 20 Response to Motion to Enforce -- ECF No 15 by Petitioner Dixon Miguel Jaramillo-Moreno. (Salvator, Jim) (Entered: 07/14/2026)
Main Document: REPLY
#22
Jul 16, 2026
ORDER GRANTING IN PART 15 Motion to Enforce the Court's July 1, 2026 Order.Within one week of this Order, the respondents must provide the petitioner with a new bond hearing before an immigration judge pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1226(a) and 8 C.F.R. §§ 236.1(d)(1), 1003.19, & 1236.1(d)(1) or else release the petitioner.The respondents must provide the petitioner's counsel no less than three business days' notice in advance of any bond hearing.At any bond hearing, the Government must bear the burden of proving that the petitioner is a flight risk by a preponderance of the evidence or a danger by clear and convincing evidence. See Hernandez-Lara v. Lyons, 10 F.4th 19, 40 (1st Cir. 2021); Kuzmic v. Baltasar, No. 26-cv-00577-CYC, 2026 WL 1291853, at *2, *5 (D. Colo. May 12, 2026); Guevara Gacia v. Bondi, No. 1:26-cv-01012-SKC, 2026 WL 835766, at *4 (D. Colo. Mar. 26, 2026); Barreno v. Baltasar, No. 025-cv-03017-GPG-TPO, 2025 WL 3190936, at *3 (D. Colo. Nov. 14, 2025); Diaz-Ceja v. McAleenan, No. 19-cv-00824-NYW, 2019 WL 2774211, at *11 to *12 (D. Colo. July 2, 2019); cf. United States v. Cisneros, 328 F.3d 610, 616 (10th Cir. 2003).The respondents must file a status report within one week of this Order stating the results of any bond hearing that was conducted or the date of the petitioner's release if no bond hearing was held.SO ORDERED by Chief Judge Daniel D. Domenico on 07/16/2026. Text Only Entry.(agryan) (Entered: 07/16/2026)
Jul 16, 2026
Order on Motion for Order
#23
Jul 23, 2026
STATUS REPORT by Respondents Juan Baltasar, Todd Blanche, Markwayne Mullin, George Valdez. (Brown, Logan) (Entered: 07/23/2026)
Main Document: STATUS
#24
Jul 23, 2026
ORDER re: 23 Status Report filed by Respondents. The respondents report that the petitioner has been provided with a new bond hearing before an immigration judge. The petitioner may file a response on or before 7/30/2026 explaining any reasons why this case should not be closed. SO ORDERED by Chief Judge Daniel D. Domenico on 7/23/2026. Text Only Entry. (rkeec) (Entered: 07/23/2026)
Jul 23, 2026
Order
#25
Jul 31, 2026
ORDER. The petitioner has not filed any response explaining why this case should not be closed. See 24 Order. Accordingly, 7 Amended Order to Show Cause is DISCHARGED, and 6 First Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to close this case. SO ORDERED by Chief Judge Daniel D. Domenico on 7/31/2026. Text Only Entry. (rkeec) (Entered: 07/31/2026)
#26
Jul 31, 2026
FINAL JUDGMENT by Clerk in favor of George Valdez, Juan Baltasar, Markwayne Mullin, Todd Blanche against Dixon Miguel Jaramillo-Moreno by Chief Judge Daniel D. Domenico on 7/31/2026. (rkeec) (Entered: 07/31/2026)
Main Document: Judgment - Clerk
Jul 31, 2026
Order