Western District of Texas • 5:26-cv-02306
Lopez Cordero v. United States Attorney Western District of Texas
Completed
Case Information
Filed: April 06, 2026
Assigned to:
Jason K Pulliam
Referred to:
—
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee
Cause:
28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Completed: July 15, 2026
Last Activity:
July 20, 2026
Parties:
View All Parties →
Docket Entries
#1
Apr 06, 2026
Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus ( Filing fee $ 5 receipt number 10903), filed by Jose Alexander Lopez Cordero. (Attachments: # 1 Cover Sheet, # 2 Envelope, # 3 Receipt)(r013) (Entered: 04/13/2026)
Main Document:
Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
#2
Apr 06, 2026
MOTION Requesting Court to Effect Service by Jose Alexander Lopez Cordero. (kc) (Entered: 04/13/2026)
Main Document:
Miscellaneous Relief
Apr 06, 2026
Case has been randomly assigned to the docket of Honorable Judge Jason K. Pulliam. (kc)
Apr 06, 2026
If ordered by the court, all referrals will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Chestney (kc)
#3
Apr 13, 2026
Case Opening Letter mailed to Jose Alexander Lopez Cordero. (kc) (Entered: 04/13/2026)
Main Document:
Case Opening Letter
Apr 13, 2026
Case Assigned/Reassigned
Apr 13, 2026
To be Referred to SA Mag Judge
#4
Apr 14, 2026
STANDING ORDER for procedure in cases before Judge Pulliam. All parties and counsel are directed to review Judge Pulliam's Standing Order containing rules of practice, particularly the requirement of conference before filing a Motion to Dismiss under Federal Rule 12(b)(6) and demonstration of complete diversity. Failure to follow these rules of practice could result in the Court striking the Motion to Dismiss on its own initiative without further notice. Signed by Judge Jason Pulliam. (r013) (Entered: 04/14/2026)
Main Document:
Order
#5
Apr 21, 2026
ORDER FOR SERVICE--It is FURTHER ORDERED that Respondents shall file a response to the Petition within seven (7) days of the date of service. The response must identify:(1) Petitioners alleged country of birth;(2) Petitioners alleged date of entry and statutory basis for removability;(3) Petitioners previous immigration detention history, if any;and (4) Petitioners alleged immigration status.It is FURTHER ORDERED that, if Petitioner elects to file a reply, Petitioner may do so no later than seven days after the Respondents file their answers/responses. Signed by Judge Jason K. Pulliam. (bt) (Entered: 04/22/2026)
Main Document:
Order
Apr 22, 2026
Text Order MOOTING 2 Motion Requesting Court to Effect Service entered by Judge Jason K. Pulliam. A service order was rendered April 21, 2026.(This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (ks1)
Apr 22, 2026
Order on Motion for Miscellaneous Relief
#6
Apr 29, 2026
Response
Main Document:
Response
#7
Jul 02, 2026
Response
Main Document:
Response
#8
Jul 09, 2026
Order
Main Document:
Order
#9
Jul 13, 2026
Order
Main Document:
Order
#10
Jul 15, 2026
TEXT ORDER GRANTING 1 PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS. Petitioner claims that Respondents have violated procedural due process rights under the Fifth Amendment based on a significant presence in the United States and/or an improper revocation of release. Respondents have submitted a response in opposition. After reviewing the briefing, provided evidence, and applicable law, the Court grants the petition based on the law as set out and analyzed in Longoria Mendoza v. Noem, 823 F. Supp. 3d 636 (W.D. Tex. 2026) and numerous other cases decided by the undersigned. While there are differences between this case and Longoria Mendoza, none warrant a different result. For reasons previously stated in Longoria Mendoza, the Court finds that (1) it has jurisdiction to consider the arguments presented in the instant habeas petition; (2) any asserted failure to exhaust administrative remedies is excused; (3) Respondents have violated Petitioner's procedural due process rights; and (4) fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412 are not available in habeas corpus proceedings like this one. The Court treats the instant action solely as a habeas action under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 and declines to consider any claim other than the alleged violation of procedural due process. The Court has considered the arguments Respondents make in response and rejects them for reasons stated in prior cases. Under the facts and circumstances of this case, this Court concludes Petitioner's detention is unlawful, and habeas relief is proper. Because Petitioner has no known criminal history, had been complying with the terms of a prior release, and there is no indication of flight risk or danger to the community, it is ORDERED that on or before July 17, 2026, Respondents shall RELEASE Petitioner Jose Alexander Lopez Cordero from custody to a public location, under conditions no more restrictive than those in place before the detention at issue. Respondents must NOTIFY Petitioner's counsel, if any, of the exact location and exact time of release as soon as practicable and no less than two hours before release. Any possible or anticipated removal or transfer of Petitioner under this present detention is PROHIBITED. No later than the next business day after the ordered release date, Respondents shall FILE a status report to confirm whether Petitioner has been released. A written final judgment will be issued separately to summarize the orders of the Court and to close this habeas case. A written final judgment will be issued separately to summarize the orders of the Court and to close this habeas case. Signed by Judge Jason K. Pulliam. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (lc) (Entered: 07/15/2026)
#11
Jul 15, 2026
Judgment
Main Document:
Judgment
Jul 15, 2026
Order
#12
Jul 20, 2026
Status Report
Main Document:
Status Report
Parties
Lopez Cordero
Party
United States Attorney Western District of Texas
Party