Western District of Texas • 5:26-cv-02303

#1

Apr 06, 2026

Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus ( Filing fee $ 5 receipt number 10901), filed by Luis Alberto Bejerano Gonzalez. (Attachments: # 1 Cover Sheet, # 2 Envelope, # 3 Receipt)(r013) (Entered: 04/13/2026)

#2

Apr 06, 2026

MOTION Requesting Court to Effect Service by Luis Alberto Bejerano Gonzalez. (kc) (Entered: 04/13/2026)

Apr 06, 2026

If ordered by the court, all referrals will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Chestney (kc)

Apr 06, 2026

Case has been randomly assigned to the docket of Honorable Judge Jason K. Pulliam. (kc)

#3

Apr 13, 2026

Case Opening Letter mailed to Luis Alberto Bejerano Gonzalez. (kc) (Entered: 04/13/2026)

Apr 13, 2026

Case Assigned/Reassigned

Apr 13, 2026

To be Referred to SA Mag Judge

#4

Apr 14, 2026

STANDING ORDER for procedure in cases before Judge Pulliam. All parties and counsel are directed to review Judge Pulliam's Standing Order containing rules of practice, particularly the requirement of conference before filing a Motion to Dismiss under Federal Rule 12(b)(6) and demonstration of complete diversity. Failure to follow these rules of practice could result in the Court striking the Motion to Dismiss on its own initiative without further notice. Signed by Judge Jason Pulliam. (r013) (Entered: 04/14/2026)

#5

Apr 21, 2026

ORDER FOR SERVICE--It is ORDERED that notice of electronic filing of the Petition (ECF No. 1) and this Order to the United States Attorney in San Antonio, Texas shall constitute service on the Federal Respondents and on all Respondents unless otherwise contested. It is FURTHER ORDERED that Respondents shall file a response to the Petition within seven (7) days of the date of service.. Signed by Judge Jason K. Pulliam. (vl) (Entered: 04/21/2026)

Apr 22, 2026

Order on Motion for Miscellaneous Relief

Apr 22, 2026

Text Order MOOTING 2 Motion Requesting Court to Effect Service entered by Judge Jason K. Pulliam. A service order was rendered April 21, 2026. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (ks1)

#6

Apr 28, 2026

Response

#7

Jul 09, 2026

Order

#8

Jul 13, 2026

Order

#9

Jul 15, 2026

TEXT ORDER GRANTING 1 PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS. Petitioner claims that Respondents have violated procedural due process rights under the Fifth Amendment based on a significant presence in the United States and/or an improper revocation of release. Respondents have submitted a response in opposition. After reviewing the briefing, provided evidence, and applicable law, the Court grants the petition based on the law as set out and analyzed in Longoria Mendoza v. Noem, 823 F. Supp. 3d 636 (W.D. Tex. 2026) and numerous other cases decided by the undersigned. While there are differences between this case and Longoria Mendoza, none warrant a different result. For reasons previously stated in Longoria Mendoza, the Court finds that (1) it has jurisdiction to consider the arguments presented in the instant habeas petition; (2) any asserted failure to exhaust administrative remedies is excused; (3) Respondents have violated Petitioner's procedural due process rights; and (4) fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412 are not available in habeas corpus proceedings like this one. The Court treats the instant action solely as a habeas action under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 and declines to consider any claim other than the alleged violation of procedural due process. The Court has considered the arguments Respondents make in response and rejects them for reasons stated in prior cases. Under the facts and circumstances of this case, this Court concludes Petitioner's detention is unlawful, and habeas relief is proper. Because Petitioner has no known criminal history, had been complying with the terms of a prior release, and there is no indication of flight risk or danger to the community, it is ORDERED that on or before July 17, 2026, Respondents shall RELEASE Petitioner Luis Alberto Bejerano Gonzalez from custody to a public location, under conditions no more restrictive than those in place before the detention at issue. Respondents must NOTIFY Petitioner's counsel, if any, of the exact location and exact time of release as soon as practicable and no less than two hours before release. Any possible or anticipated removal or transfer of Petitioner under this present detention is PROHIBITED. No later than the next business day after the ordered release date, Respondents shall FILE a status report to confirm whether Petitioner has been released. A written final judgment will be issued separately to summarize the orders of the Court and to close this habeas case. A written final judgment will be issued separately to summarize the orders of the Court and to close this habeas case. Signed by Judge Jason K. Pulliam. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (lc) (Entered: 07/15/2026)

#10

Jul 15, 2026

Judgment

Jul 15, 2026

Order

#11

Jul 20, 2026

Status Report