District of Colorado • 1:26-cv-01644

#1

Apr 16, 2026

APPLICATION for Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 USC 2241 (Filing fee $ 5, Receipt Number ACODC-10954680)Attorney Deliane Quiles added to party Jaspreet Singh(pty:pet), filed by Jaspreet Singh. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet, # 2 Summons, # 3 Summons, # 4 Summons, # 5 Summons, # 6 Summons, # 7 Exhibit A, # 8 Exhibit B)(Quiles, Deliane) (Entered: 04/16/2026)

#2

Apr 16, 2026

Case assigned to Chief Judge Daniel D. Domenico and drawn to Magistrate Judge Cyrus Y. Chung. Text Only Entry. (agarc, ) (Entered: 04/20/2026)

#3

Apr 20, 2026

Magistrate Judge consent form issued pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c). (agarc, ) (Entered: 04/20/2026)

#4

Apr 20, 2026

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE.The petitioner must serve the respondents with 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4. The petitioner need not serve a summons with a copy of the petition. The petitioner must promptly file proof of service in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(l)(1).Having reviewed the petition, I find that good cause appears, and it is therefore ORDERED that the respondents must SHOW CAUSE within three weeks after service of the petition why the application for a writ of habeas corpus should not be granted. The petitioner may file a reply within two weeks of service of the response(s).SO ORDERED by Chief Judge Daniel D. Domenico on 4/20/2026. Text Only Entry (dddlc1, ) (Entered: 04/20/2026)

#5

Apr 20, 2026

ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Cyrus Y. Chung. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A) and (B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a) and (b), this case is referred to the assigned United States Magistrate Judge to (1) convene a scheduling conference under Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) and enter a scheduling order meeting the requirements of Local Civ. R. 16.2, (2) conduct such status conferences and issue such orders necessary for compliance with the scheduling order, including amendments or modifications of the scheduling order upon a showing of good cause, (3) hear and determine pretrial matters, including discovery and other non-dispositive motions, (4) conduct hearings, including evidentiary hearings, and submit proposed findings of fact and recommendations for rulings on dispositive motions, and (5) pursuant to Local Civ. R. 16.6 and at the discretion of the Magistrate Judge, convene such early neutral evaluation and/or settlement conferences and direct related procedures as may facilitate resolution of this case without the necessity of a motion or prior authorization of the undersigned. SO ORDERED by Chief Judge Daniel D. Domenico on 4/20/2026. Text Only Entry (dddlc1, ) (Entered: 04/20/2026)

Apr 20, 2026

Order Referring Case to Magistrate Judge

Apr 20, 2026

Order to Show Cause

#6

Apr 27, 2026

SUMMONS Returned Executed by Jaspreet Singh. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A)(Quiles, Deliane) (Entered: 04/27/2026)

#7

May 18, 2026

NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Nicholas Albert Deuschle on behalf of Juan Baltazar, Todd Blanche, Todd Lyons, Markwayne MullinAttorney Nicholas Albert Deuschle added to party Juan Baltazar(pty:res), Attorney Nicholas Albert Deuschle added to party Todd Blanche(pty:res), Attorney Nicholas Albert Deuschle added to party Todd Lyons(pty:res), Attorney Nicholas Albert Deuschle added to party Markwayne Mullin(pty:res) (Deuschle, Nicholas) (Entered: 05/18/2026)

#8

May 18, 2026

RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE re 4 by Respondents Juan Baltazar, Todd Blanche, Todd Lyons, Markwayne Mullin. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1 - Declaration of J. Waba, # 2 Exhibit 2 - Singh Decision, # 3 Exhibit 3 - Valle-Rodriguez Decision, # 4 Exhibit 4 - Manzanarez Mendoza Decision)(Deuschle, Nicholas) (Entered: 05/18/2026)

#9

Jun 01, 2026

REPLY by Petitioner Jaspreet Singh. (Quiles, Deliane) (Entered: 06/01/2026)

#10

Jun 24, 2026

SUMMONS Returned Executed by Jaspreet Singh. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A)(Quiles, Deliane) (Entered: 06/24/2026)

#11

Jul 01, 2026

ORDER.In light of Santillan Quiroz v. Mullin, — F.4th —, No. 26-6019, 2026 WL 1876709 (10th Cir. June 30, 2026), within one week of this Order the respondents must either:(a) provide the petitioner with a bond hearing before an immigration judge pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1226(a) and 8 C.F.R. §§ 236.1(d)(1), 1003.19, & 1236.1(d)(1) or else release the petitioner, and file a status report stating the results of any bond hearing that was conducted or the date of the petitioner's release if no bond hearing was held; or(b) show cause why this case is distinguishable from Santillan Quiroz and the application for a writ of habeas corpus should not be granted.SO ORDERED by Chief Judge Daniel D. Domenico on 07/01/2026. Text Only Entry. (agryan) (Entered: 07/01/2026)

Jul 01, 2026

Order

#12

Jul 08, 2026

RESPONSE to 11 Order,,, to Show Cause by Respondents Juan Baltazar, Todd Blanche, Todd Lyons, Markwayne Mullin. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1 - May 28, 2026, Order of Remvoal, # 2 Exhibit 2 - Petitioner's Automated Case Information)(Deuschle, Nicholas) (Entered: 07/08/2026)

#13

Jul 09, 2026

ORDER re: 12 Response. While removal proceedings are being adjudicated, a noncitizen may be detained under 8 U.S.C. § 1225 or 1226. See Johnson v. Guzman Chavez, 594 U.S. 523, 527-28, 533 (2021); Jennings v. Rodriguez, 583 U.S. 281, 287-89 (2018). At the time this case was filed, the petitioner's removal proceedings were still pending, but the respondents now state that an immigration judge has since issued an order of removal that has become final. See Doc. 12 . It thus appears that the petitioner is now subject to mandatory detention under 8 U.S.C. § 1231 during the ninety-day "removal period," and that, depending on the circumstances, he could be properly detained under Section 1231 for six months or longer. See 8 U.S.C. § 1231; Zadvydas v. Davis, 533 U.S. 678, 687-88 (2001); Le v. Mullin, No. 1:26-cv-00298-DDD-CYC, 2026 WL 1625297, at *2 (D. Colo. May 11, 2026). The petitioner may file a reply on or before 7/16/2026 explaining any reasons why 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus should not be denied as moot and dismissed without prejudice. SO ORDERED by Chief Judge Daniel D. Domenico on 07/09/2026. Text Only Entry. (agryan) (Entered: 07/09/2026)

Jul 09, 2026

Order

#14

Jul 15, 2026

REPLY by Petitioner Jaspreet Singh. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A)(Quiles, Deliane) (Entered: 07/15/2026)

#15

Jul 15, 2026

ORDER ORDER re: 14 Petitioner's Reply to 12 Response and 13 Order.In light of Santillan Quiroz v. Mullin, F.4th, No. 26-6019, 2026 WL 1876709 (10th Cir. June 30, 2026), and because it appears the petitioner's order of removal has not yet become final, within one week of this Order the respondents must either:(a) provide the petitioner with a bond hearing before an immigration judge pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1226(a) and 8 C.F.R. §§ 236.1(d)(1), 1003.19, & 1236.1(d)(1) or else release the petitioner, and file a status report stating the results of any bond hearing that was conducted or the date of the petitioner's release if no bond hearing was held; or(b) show cause why this case is distinguishable from Santillan Quiroz and the application for a writ of habeas corpus should not be granted.SO ORDERED by Chief Judge Daniel D. Domenico on 7/15/2026. Text Only Entry. (rkeec) (Entered: 07/15/2026)

Jul 15, 2026

Order

#16

Jul 22, 2026

Extension of Time

#17

Jul 23, 2026

ORDER GRANTING 16 Motion for Seven-Day Extension of Time to Comply with Order for Bond Hearing.On or before 7/29/2026, the respondents must provide the petitioner with a bond hearing before an immigration judge pursuant to 15 Order or else release the petitioner, and file a status report stating the results of any bond hearing that was conducted or the date of the petitioner's release if no bond hearing was held.The respondents must provide the petitioner's counsel no less than three business days' notice in advance of any bond hearing.SO ORDERED by Chief Judge Daniel D. Domenico on 7/23/2026. Text Only Entry. (rkeec) (Entered: 07/23/2026)

Jul 23, 2026

Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File

#18

Jul 29, 2026

STATUS REPORT pursuant to the Court's July 15, 2026, Order and its July 23, 2026, Order by Respondents Juan Baltazar, Todd Blanche, Todd Lyons, Markwayne Mullin. (Deuschle, Nicholas) (Entered: 07/29/2026)

#19

Jul 31, 2026

ORDER re: 18 Status Report filed by Respondents. The respondents report that the petitioner has been provided with a bond hearing before an immigration judge. The petitioner may file a response on or before 8/5/2026 explaining any reasons why this case should not be closed and 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus dismissed without prejudice. SO ORDERED by Chief Judge Daniel D. Domenico on 7/31/2026. Text Only Entry. (rkeec) (Entered: 07/31/2026)

Jul 31, 2026

Order