District of Nevada • 2:26-cv-01061

#1

Apr 07, 2026

MOTION/APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Petitioner Alvin Enrique Perez Chacon.. (Attachments: # 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus)(HAM) (Entered: 04/07/2026)

#2

Apr 07, 2026

ADVISORY LETTER to litigant. (HAM) (Entered: 04/07/2026)

Apr 07, 2026

Assign Judges in Civil Case

Apr 07, 2026

Case randomly assigned to District Judge Amy M. Baggio and Magistrate Judge Elayna J. Youchah. Nature of Suit: 463 - Habeas Immigration (HAM)

#3

Apr 09, 2026

Order Appointing Counsel AND Order on Motion/Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis

#4

Apr 09, 2026

Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus

#5

Apr 15, 2026

Notice Appearance of Counsel

#6

Apr 21, 2026

Notice Appearance of Counsel

#7

May 14, 2026

Notice Other

#8

May 15, 2026

Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus Amended

#9

May 20, 2026

MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable District Judge Amy M. Baggio on 5/20/2026. In light of Petitioner's Amended Petition 8, the Court ORDERS Respondents to docket a response to the Amended Petition no later than 5/26/2026 at 5:00 PM PST. Respondents shall specifically address the legal basis for Petitioner's continued detention and whether Petitioner qualifies for class-wide relief as set forth in Jacobo-Ramirez et al v. Mullin et al, No. 2:25-cv-02136-RFB-MDC (D. Nev.). Ordered by Judge Amy M. Baggio. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MAM) (Entered: 05/20/2026)

May 20, 2026

Minute Order

#10

May 26, 2026

Response

#11

May 26, 2026

Notice Appearance of Counsel

#12

May 26, 2026

Response

#13

May 28, 2026

Order Reassign Judge

#14

Jun 10, 2026

MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 6/10/2026. Based on the parties' briefing and document production to-date, the Court finds it is unable to determine whether Federal Respondents have complied with this Court's Order in Jacobo-Ramirez v. Mullin, No. 2:25-cv02136-RFB-MDC, 2026 WL 879799 (D. Nev. Mar. 30, 2026), as to this Petitioner. See Jacobo-Ramirez, 2026 WL 879799, at *31 ("The Court issues a classwide declaratory judgment that Class Members are subject to detention under § 1226(a) and its implementing regulations. Defendants must therefore comply with 8 C.F.R. §§ 236.1(b); 236.1(c)(8) in arresting and detaining any Class Member. If Defendants deny release on bond or conditional parole after an initial custody determination, Class Members are entitled to custody redetermination(s) before an immigration judge upon request consistent with 8 C.F.R. §§ 236.1(d); 1003.19.").This Court has the express authority to "use[,] or authorize the use[,] of suitable discovery procedures" to dispose of a viable habeas petition "as law and justice require." Harris v. Nelson, 394 U.S. 286, 290 (1969) (quoting 28 U.S.C. § 2243); cf. also Rule 6(b), Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States District Courts (empowering a court to authorize discovery in habeas corpus proceedings for "good cause"); id. at Rule 1(b) (enabling a court to apply these rules to petitions brought under 28 U.S.C. § 2241). Indeed, it is "the inescapable obligation of the courts" to vindicate their "habeas corpus jurisdiction" by fashioning "methods for securing facts where necessary." Harris, 394 U.S. at 299. In short, "the power of inquiry on federal habeas corpus is plenary." Id. at 292 (citing Townsend v. Sain, 372 U.S. 293, 321 (1963)). IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED Federal Respondents Federal Respondents must PRODUCE the following records, which are relevant to the lawfulness of Petitioner's detention: (1) I-200 Warrant for Arrest of Alien; (2) Form I-286 Initial Custody Determination; (3) all immigration court orders in Petitioner's removal proceedings or custody redetermination proceedings; (4) documents reflecting any appeal of any immigration court orders by the Department of Homeland Security or Petitioner; (5) transcripts and/or audio recordings of any custody redetermination proceedings. Specifically, Federal Respondents must PRODUCE these materials to Petitioner's Counsel by June 15, 2026. Alternatively, by that same date, Respondents must CERTIFY that, after a diligent search, they have determined that the record(s) are not in their possession, custody, or control. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED Parties shall file supplemental briefing on their respective positions as to whether Petitioner's detention was void ab initio based upon Federal Respondents' document production. Specifically, Petitioner shall file supplemental briefing on the matter by June 17, 2026, and Federal Respondents may file a response by June 19, 2026. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - CMB) (Entered: 06/10/2026)

Jun 10, 2026

Minute Order

#15

Jun 18, 2026

Stipulation

#16

Jun 18, 2026

Supplement

#17

Jun 23, 2026

Notice Appearance of Counsel

#18

Jun 23, 2026

Supplement

#19

Jun 24, 2026

Reply

#20

Jun 24, 2026

MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 6/24/2026. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED 15 Stipulation for Extension is GRANTED nunc pro tunc. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - CMB) (Entered: 06/24/2026)

Jun 24, 2026

Minute Order AND Order on Stipulation

#21

Jul 07, 2026

Order AND ~Util - Terminate Case

#22

Jul 07, 2026

Judgment

#23

Jul 09, 2026

Status Report