Active
Case Information
Filed: March 24, 2026
Assigned to:
Jason K Pulliam
Referred to:
—
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee
Cause:
28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Active
Last Activity:
June 15, 2026
Parties:
View All Parties →
Docket Entries
#1
Mar 24, 2026
Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus ( Filing fee $ 5 receipt number ATXWDC-21627885), filed by DELVYS JESUS PORTILLO BERNAL.(Gonzalez, Leticia) (Entered: 03/24/2026)
Main Document:
Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Mar 24, 2026
DEFICIENCY NOTICE: Please note a Civil Cover Sheet is required when filing a Petition. Please file a signed/completed civil cover sheet by using "Other Documents-Supplement" and link it to the Petition. re 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (rqr)
Mar 24, 2026
Case assigned to Judge Jason K. Pulliam. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (rqr)
Mar 24, 2026
If ordered by the court, all referrals will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Bemporad (rqr)
#2
Mar 25, 2026
JS44 (Civil Cover Sheet) submitted by Delvys Jesus Portillo-Bernal. (Gonzalez, Leticia) (Entered: 03/25/2026)
Main Document:
JS44 (Civil Cover Sheet) Submitted
Mar 25, 2026
Deficiency Notice
Mar 25, 2026
To be Referred to SA Mag Judge
Mar 25, 2026
Case Assigned/Reassigned
#4
Mar 27, 2026
Order
Main Document:
Order
#5
Mar 27, 2026
Certified Mail Receipt
Main Document:
Certified Mail Receipt
#6
Apr 01, 2026
Response
Main Document:
Response
#7
Apr 08, 2026
Certified Mail Receipt
Main Document:
Certified Mail Receipt
#8
Apr 08, 2026
Response
Main Document:
Response
#9
Jun 12, 2026
TEXT ORDER GRANTING 1 PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS. Petitioner claims that Respondents have violated procedural due process rights under the Fifth Amendment based on a significant presence in the United States and/or an improper revocation of release. Respondents have submitted a response in opposition. After reviewing the briefing, provided evidence, and applicable law, the Court grants the petition based on the law as set out and analyzed in Longoria Mendoza v. Noem, ___ F. Supp. 3d ___, ___, No 5:26-CV-0728-JKP, 2026 WL 809441 (W.D. Tex. Feb. 26, 2026) and numerous other cases decided by the undersigned. While there are differences between this case and Longoria Mendoza, none warrant a different result. For reasons previously stated in Longoria Mendoza, the Court finds that (1) it has jurisdiction to consider the arguments presented in the instant habeas petition; (2) any asserted failure to exhaust administrative remedies is excused; (3) Respondents have violated Petitioner's procedural due process rights; and (4) fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412 are not available in habeas corpus proceedings like this one. The Court treats the instant action solely as a habeas action under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 and declines to consider any claim other than the alleged violation of procedural due process. The Court has considered the arguments Respondents make in response and rejects them for reasons stated in prior cases. Under the facts and circumstances of this case, this Court concludes Petitioner's detention is unlawful, and habeas relief is proper. Because Petitioner has no known criminal history, had been complying with the terms of a prior release, and there is no indication of flight risk or danger to the community, it is ORDERED that on or before June 14, 2026, Respondents shall RELEASE Petitioner Delvys Jesus Portillo-Bernal from custody to a public location, under conditions no more restrictive than those in place before the detention at issue. Respondents must NOTIFY Petitioner's counsel of the exact location and exact time of release as soon as practicable and no less than two hours before release. Any possible or anticipated removal or transfer of Petitioner under this present detention is PROHIBITED. No later than the next business day after the ordered release date, Respondents shall FILE a status report to confirm whether Petitioner has been released. If counsel for Petitioner disagrees with any aspect of the filed Status Report, counsel may file a separate Status Report. A written final judgment will be issued separately to summarize the orders of the Court and to close this habeas case. Signed by Judge Jason K. Pulliam. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (rw) (Entered: 06/12/2026)
#10
Jun 12, 2026
FINAL JUDGMENT. Signed by Judge Jason K. Pulliam. (cih) (Entered: 06/12/2026)
Main Document:
Judgment AND ~Util - Set/Clear Flags
Jun 12, 2026
Order
#11
Jun 15, 2026
Status Report
Main Document:
Status Report
Parties
NOEM
Party
PORTILLO BERNAL
Party