Eastern District of California • 2:26-cv-00894

#1

Mar 16, 2026

PETITION for WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS against All Respondents by Jhean Marco Travi Caebajal. (Deputy Clerk OML) (Entered: 03/16/2026)

#2

Mar 16, 2026

MOTION for TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER by Jhean Marco Travi Caebajal. (Deputy Clerk OML) (Entered: 03/16/2026)

#3

Mar 16, 2026

PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED. Consent or Decline due by 4/20/2026. (Attachments: # 1 Litigant Letter) (Deputy Clerk OML) (Entered: 03/16/2026)

#4

Mar 16, 2026

MINUTE ORDER issued by Courtroom Deputy for District Judge Kirk E. Sherriff on 3/16/2026: The Court has reviewed petitioner's 1 petition for writ of habeas corpus and 2 motion for temporary restraining order. Respondents shall file any opposition to the 2 motion for temporary restraining order by March 20, 2026. Petitioner may file a reply by March 25, 2026. Respondents shall indicate in their briefing their position as to whether the 2 motion for temporary restraining order should be converted into a motion for preliminary injunction. Respondents shall also state whether they request a hearing on the 2 motion. Pending the Court's decision, and unless and until the Court orders otherwise, the Court ORDERS that respondents shall not transfer petitioner out of this District. See F.T.C. v. Dean Foods Co., 384 U.S. 597, 604 (1966) (noting court's "express authority under the All Writs Act to issue such temporary injunctions as may be necessary to protect its own jurisdiction"). (jv) (Entered: 03/16/2026)

#5

Mar 16, 2026

CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Anonymous) (Entered: 03/16/2026)

Mar 16, 2026

SERVICE BY MAIL: 3 Prisoner New Case Documents served on Jhean Marco Travi Caebajal. (Deputy Clerk OML)

Mar 16, 2026

RECEIPT number 200017720 for $5.00 from Jhean Marco Travi Caebajal. (Deputy Clerk KEZ)

Mar 16, 2026

Service by Mail

Mar 16, 2026

Minute Order

#6

Apr 05, 2026

RESPONSE by Pamela Bondi, Todd M. Lyons, Kristi Noem, Warden to 4 Minute Order,,,,. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit)(McDonald, Tracey) (Entered: 04/05/2026)

#7

Apr 08, 2026

Miscellaneous Relief

#8

Apr 08, 2026

Notice (Other)

#9

May 12, 2026

Miscellaneous Relief

#10

Jun 02, 2026

MEMORANDUM by Jhean Marco Travi Caebajal in support of 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Jhean Marco Travi Caebajal. (Deputy Clerk AJB) (Entered: 06/03/2026)

#11

Jun 04, 2026

REPLY BRIEF in Support of Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by Jhean Marco Travi Caebajal. (Deputy Clerk OFR) (Entered: 06/05/2026)

#12

Jun 29, 2026

Miscellaneous Relief

#13

Jul 13, 2026

MINUTE ORDER (Text Only Entry) signed by District Judge Kirk E. Sherriff on 7/13/2026: The 2 motion for temporary restraining order is denied. Petitioner entered the United States without being inspected, admitted, or paroled by an immigration officer in May 2023, and he was released on his own recognizance pending removal proceedings. See Doc. 6-1. Noncitizens who have previously been released into the interior of the United States pending their removal proceedings are subject to 8 U.S.C. § 1226(a). See, e.g., Sharan S. v. Chestnut, No. 1:25-CV-01427-KES-SKO (HC), 2025 WL 3167826, at *4-8 (E.D. Cal. Nov. 12, 2025). But, in January 2026, petitioner crossed the border into Canada, was denied entry by Canadian officials, and then was re-detained by U.S. immigration officials at the U.S.-Canada border. See Doc. 2 at 2; Doc. 6-1. Courts have found that, despite a prior entry, those who are detained at the border upon re-entering are subject to 8 U.S.C. § 1225(b). See, e.g., Misiara Erbite v. Ripa, No. 2:26-CV-558-JES-NPM, 2026 WL 776143, at *1 (M.D. Fla. Mar. 19, 2026) ("But this is not a situation where a noncitizen was detained at the border and then released into the country. Rather, Misiara Erbite was apprehended at the border when he attempted to reenter the United States and immediately taken into custody, which puts him squarely under § 1225."); see also Cong v. Noem, No. 25-CV-3730-GPC-DEB, 2026 WL 76566, at *3 (S.D. Cal. Jan. 9, 2026) (noting that there was no "dispute that Petitioner is detained under § 1225(b)(1)," in case where noncitizen inadvertently crossed the border into Mexico). Petitioner did not raise a prolonged detention claim in his 2 motion for temporary restraining order, but he appears to have raised such a claim in his 12 memorandum of points and authorities in support of his petition for writ of habeas corpus. The 1 petition for writ of habeas corpus is referred to the assigned magistrate judge for the preparation of findings and recommendations, including consideration of petitioner's prolonged detention claim. (Deputy Clerk YV) (Entered: 07/13/2026)

Jul 13, 2026

Service by Mail

Jul 13, 2026

SERVICE BY MAIL: 13 Minute Order, Order on Motion for TRO, served on Jhean Marco Travi Caebajal. (Deputy Clerk YV)

Jul 13, 2026

Minute Order AND Order on Motion for TRO

#14

Jul 14, 2026

06 - HC/Order Requiring Respondent to File a Response

Jul 14, 2026

Service by Mail

Jul 14, 2026

SERVICE BY MAIL: 14 Order served on Jhean Marco Travi Caebajal. (Deputy Clerk AML)