Central District of California • 5:25-cv-02532

#1

Sep 24, 2025

PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in Federal Custody (28 USC 2241), Receipt No. BCACDC-40563785 for $5 filing fee, filed by Petitioner Mirna Estela Perez Mendoza. (Attorney Frances Arroyo added to party Mirna Estela Perez Mendoza(pty:pet))(Arroyo, Frances) (Entered: 09/24/2025)

#2

Sep 24, 2025

First APPLICATION to file document Exhibit A of Petitioner's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus under seal filed by Petitioner Mirna Estela Perez Mendoza. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Arroyo, Frances) (Entered: 09/24/2025)

#3

Sep 24, 2025

SEALED DECLARATION IN SUPPORT OF First APPLICATION to file document Exhibit A of Petitioner's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus under seal 2 filed by Petitioner Mirna Estela Perez Mendoza. (Attachments: # 1 Unredacted Document Exhibit A of Petitioner's Habeas Petition)(Arroyo, Frances) (Entered: 09/24/2025)

#4

Sep 24, 2025

CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Petitioner Mirna Estela Perez Mendoza. (Arroyo, Frances) (Entered: 09/24/2025)

#5

Sep 24, 2025

NOTICE RE INTRA-DISTRICT TRANSFER by Clerk of Court due to incorrect intra-district venue selected by the filer. Case is transferred to the Eastern Division. Case has been assigned to Judge Hernan D. Vera for all further proceedings. Any matters that may be referred to a Magistrate Judge are assigned to Margo A. Rocconi. New Case Number 5:25-cv-02532-HDV-MAR. (car) (Entered: 09/24/2025)

#6

Sep 24, 2025

NOTICE OF REFERENCE to a U.S. Magistrate Judge. This case has been assigned to the calendar of the Honorable District Judge Hernan D. Vera and referred to Magistrate Judge Margo A. Rocconi, who is authorized to consider preliminary matters and conduct all further hearings as may be appropriate or necessary. Pursuant to Local Rule 83-2.4, the Court must be notified within five (5) days of any address change. See notice for additional details. (car) (Entered: 09/24/2025)

#7

Sep 25, 2025

Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, 1 filed by Petitioner Mirna Estela Perez Mendoza. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Summons, # 2 Proposed Summons, # 3 Proposed Summons)(Arroyo, Frances) (Entered: 09/25/2025)

#8

Sep 25, 2025

First NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Withdraw First APPLICATION to file document Exhibit A of Petitioner's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus under seal 2 filed by Petitioner Mirna Estela Perez Mendoza. (Arroyo, Frances) (Entered: 09/25/2025)

#9

Sep 25, 2025

EXHIBIT Filed filed by Petitioner Mirna Estela Perez Mendoza. Exhibit A (Petitioner's Bond Packet, redacted pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.2 and Local Rule 79-5) as to Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, 1 . (Arroyo, Frances) (Entered: 09/25/2025)

#10

Sep 25, 2025

NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Request to Issue Summons RE: Summons Request 7 . The following error(s) was found: The caption of the summons must match the caption of the complaint verbatim. If the caption is too large to fit in the space provided, enter the name of the first party and then write see attached.Next, attach a face page of the complaint or a second page addendum to the Summons. The summons cannot be issued until this defect has been corrected. Please correct the defect and re-file your request. (san) (Entered: 09/25/2025)

#11

Sep 25, 2025

Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, 1 filed by Petitioner Mirna Estela Perez Mendoza. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Summons, # 2 Proposed Summons, # 3 Proposed Summons)(Arroyo, Frances) (Entered: 09/25/2025)

#13

Sep 26, 2025

First EX PARTE APPLICATION for Temporary Restraining Order as to Detention of Petitioner Mirna Estela Perez Mendoza by ICE without constitutionally adequate hearing [OPPOSITION POSITION UNKNOWN] filed by Petitioner Mirna Estela Perez Mendoza. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed TRO, # 2 Proposed Order for Expediting Briefing Schedule, # 3 Declaration of Notice Pursuant to Local Rule 7-19) (Arroyo, Frances) (Entered: 09/26/2025)

#14

Sep 26, 2025

MINUTE ORDER (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE RE PETITIONER'S EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER by Judge Hernan D. Vera. The Court therefore orders the parties to meet and confer regarding a stipulation to set an individualized bond hearing within seven days. If the parties are unable to reach a stipulation, the Court orders Respondents to file an Opposition to the Application by September 30, 2025. Petitioner may file a reply by October 3, 2025. The Court furthers orders that Respondents are enjoined from transferring, relocating, or removing Petitioner outside of the Central District of California pending resolution of the Application. [See order for details] (lom) (Entered: 09/26/2025)

#15

Sep 30, 2025

First STIPULATION for Hearing re Individualized Bond Hearing Before Immigration Judge Pursuant to Courts September 26, 2025 Minute Order filed by Petitioner Mirna Estela Perez Mendoza.(Arroyo, Frances) (Entered: 09/30/2025)

#16

Oct 02, 2025

ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION RE INDIVIDUALIZED BOND HEARING 15 by Judge Hernan D. Vera. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. Petitioner shall be provided an individualized bond hearing before an Immigration Judge on or before October 6, 2025, pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1226(a). 2. All other relief is reserved. Nothing in this Order alters any prior orders in this case. (lom) (Entered: 10/02/2025)

#17

Jan 08, 2026

TEXT ONLY ENTRY (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER by Judge Hernan D. Vera: The Court issued an order approving the parties' Stipulation re Individualized Bond Hearing on October 2, 2025 16, and has received no subsequent filings. The parties are ordered to file a status report on the case by January 15, 2026. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (wm) TEXT ONLY ENTRY (Entered: 01/08/2026)

Jan 08, 2026

Text Only Scheduling Notice

#18

Jan 15, 2026

REPORT ON CASE STATUS filed by Respondents Pam Bondi, David Marin, Kristi Noem, Fereti Semaia re: Text Only Scheduling Notice, 17 (Beck, Daniel) (Entered: 01/15/2026)

#19

Jan 20, 2026

MINUTE ORDER (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER DISMISSING CASE by Judge Hernan D. Vera. The Court has received a status report [Dkt. 18] indicating that Petitioner has been released pursuant to the Court's Order Approving Stipulation re Individualized Bond Hearing [Dkt. 16]. Since Petitioner is no longer in custody, the Court agrees with Respondents [Dkt. 18] that the habeas corpus petition [Dkt. 1] is moot and is therefore dismissed without prejudice. The Court shall retain jurisdiction to adjudicate any collateral enforcement issues. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (lom) (Entered: 01/20/2026)