District of New Jersey • 3:26-cv-00057

#1

Jan 06, 2026

PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus ( Filing fee $ 5 receipt number ANJDC-16963234.), filed by Cindy Paola Aguilar Ramos. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Civil Cover Sheet)(WEINGART, SCOTT) (Entered: 01/06/2026)

Jan 06, 2026

Add and Terminate Judges

Jan 06, 2026

Judge Michael A. Shipp added. (jjc, )

#2

Feb 27, 2026

ORDER TO ANSWER. (n/m) Signed by Judge Michael A. Shipp on 2/27/2026. (mj) (Entered: 03/02/2026)

#3

Mar 02, 2026

NOTICE of Appearance by MARK M. MAKHAIL on behalf of CINDY PAOLA AGUILAR RAMOS (MAKHAIL, MARK) (Entered: 03/02/2026)

#4

Mar 17, 2026

Substitution of Attorney - Attorney FRANCES C. BAJADA terminated. Attorney JACOB HERIC for TODD M LYONS,JACOB HERIC for KRISTI NOEM,JACOB HERIC for RUBEN PEREZ added.. (HERIC, JACOB) (Entered: 03/17/2026)

#5

Mar 17, 2026

RESPONSE to Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by TODD M LYONS, KRISTI NOEM, RUBEN PEREZ. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1 - Form I-213 2022-01-28, # 2 Exhibit 2 - Form I-213 2025-08-28, # 3 Exhibit 3 - Order of the IJ)(HERIC, JACOB) (Entered: 03/17/2026)

#6

Mar 24, 2026

REPLY to Response re 5 Response to Habeas Petition,. (WEINGART, SCOTT) (Entered: 03/24/2026)

#7

Sep 28, 2026

TEXT ORDER: The Court has reviewed Petitioner's Reply. (ECF No. 6 .) Respondents shall, within 14 days of the date of this Order, file a response addressing the allegations and arguments raised therein. In particular, Respondents shall address: (1) whether, and if so, on what legal authority, Respondents contend that ICE was authorized to impose additional conditions of release, including enrollment in the Intensive Supervision Appearance Program and an ankle-monitor requirement, following entry of the Immigration Judge's bond order, submitted at ECF No. 5 -3, which orders Petitioner's release from custody upon payment of an $8,000 bond without expressly imposing any additional conditions of release; (2) whether any subsequent order or proceeding modified or supplemented the Immigration Judge's bond order and, if so, the date and nature of such modification or supplementation; (3) whether Respondents contend that Petitioner had an available administrative procedure through which she could challenge the conditions imposed by ICE after entry of the bond order, identifying the specific procedure and legal authority providing for such review; and (4) Respondents' position as to Petitioner's arguments concerning exhaustion and 8 U.S.C. § 1226(e). Respondents shall attach any order or other record on which they rely in support of their response. So Ordered by Judge Michael A. Shipp on 9/28/2026. (jab) (Entered: 09/28/2026)

Sep 28, 2026

Text Order

#8

Oct 13, 2026

RESPONSE re 7 Text Order,,,,,. (HERIC, JACOB) (Entered: 10/13/2026)

#9

Oct 15, 2026

TEXT ORDER: The Court has reviewed Respondents' response to the Court's September 28, 2026, Text Order (ECF No. 8). Respondents represent that they are unaware of any subsequent order or proceeding modifying or supplementing the Immigration Judge's bond order. (Id.) Respondents further report that Petitioner's ankle monitor was removed on or about September 30, 2026, but that Petitioner remains enrolled in a program involving the SmartLINK application. (Id.) Within 14 days of the date of this Order, Respondents shall file a supplemental submission addressing the following: (1) The conditions of release currently imposed on Petitioner, including the requirements associated with her SmartLINK enrollment and any reporting, monitoring, or other restrictions, and the legal authority for each condition; (2) Whether Respondents contend that 8 U.S.C. § 1226(a) authorizes ICE to impose additional conditions of release after an Immigration Judge has ordered release on bond without imposing or expressly authorizing those conditions, and, if so, the specific statutory and regulatory basis for that position; (3) The specific administrative procedure, if any, available to Petitioner to challenge the conditions imposed by ICE after entry of the Immigration Judge's bond order, including how that procedure applies under the circumstances presented here and the legal authority establishing its availability; (4) Whether Respondents maintain that 8 U.S.C. § 1226(e) independently bars judicial review of Petitioner's claims or that her failure to exhaust administrative remedies independently warrants denial of the Petition, even if the Court concludes that ICE lacked authority to impose the challenged conditions; and (5) Whether Respondents contend that the removal of Petitioner's ankle monitor or her continued enrollment in SmartLINK renders any portion of the Petition moot or otherwise limits the relief available and, if so, the factual and legal basis for that position. Respondents shall attach any pertinent orders or records not previously submitted and shall identify any material distinction between this case and Moreira da Silva v. LaForge, No. 25-17095, 2026 WL 45165 (D.N.J. Jan. 7, 2026), to the extent Respondents contend that the decision is distinguishable. Within 7 days after Respondents file their supplemental submission, Petitioner may file a response addressing the submission and identifying the relief she continues to seek. The Court reserves decision on the Petition pending completion of these submissions. So Ordered by Judge Michael A. Shipp on 10/15/2026. (jab) (Entered: 10/15/2026)

Oct 15, 2026

Text Order

#10

Oct 29, 2026

Letter from Respondents in Response to ECF No. 9. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A - Declaration of B.S., # 2 Exhibit B - SmartLINK Agreement)(HERIC, JACOB) (Entered: 10/29/2026)

#11

Nov 06, 2026

Letter